18
   

Should we eliminate high school sports for budget?

 
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:33 pm
David wrote:
Quote:
I coud rent them submachineguns, for lupine safety.

some nice MP5s


How crude. And unneeded. We simply stared them down. They recognized our innate intellectual superiority and slunk away

0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:35 pm
sports got a lot more expensive when the law mandated equal time for girls. Nobody wanted to cut boys sports so what we did is add girl sports. My boy does Football and track, my girl does bowling and golf. To me bowling and golf are not sports, but because of the law cutting them would be a problem, because they are popular with the girls, they must stay. The school needs to offer a lot of useless girl sports to balance out the popularity and expense of boys football.

Ideally I would offer Football and basketball to the boys, for the girls volleyball and basketball, and nothing else. I figure this would cut the cost in half, and be fair to the sexes, though the law does not agree on the fairness part because the football teams are so big.
edgarblythe
 
  3  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:39 pm
Sports are very important to students, sometimes the only reason a student remains involved. It is more than getting exercise, but also the fellowship and the teamwork they learn. The memories they build to last a lifetime. I don't understand why schools are unable to get enough funding, while we are able to spend trillions at the drop of a hat on military and pork barrel issues.
roger
 
  3  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:46 pm
@hawkeye10,
Take my word for it - or don't, but golfing skill can be very important in later life.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:56 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
I don't understand why schools are unable to get enough funding


I dont think that funding is the problem, it is spending that is the problem
Quote:
We're often told that public schools are underfunded. In the District, the spending figure cited most commonly is $8,322 per child, but total spending is close to $25,000 per child -- on par with tuition at Sidwell Friends, the private school Chelsea Clinton attended in the 1990s.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040402921.html

interesting piece from CATO about cost
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzvKyfV3JtE
0 Replies
 
Pemerson
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 03:58 pm
I think high school sports are extremely important in today's world, mostly because kids no longer spend long afternoons roaming around town, visiting each other's homes, building tree houses in the wooded areas, or creating their own sand lots for playing sports. They can't even use school basketball courts. Mostly because of the freaks lurking around for God knows what reason.

Sports and music were both cancelled in Michigan during the 80's recession where I was covering the school boards as a reporter. In some cases the parents got together to raise funds for football, some other sports.
0 Replies
 
engineer
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 04:11 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

U left out the RIFLE Team.

Only because I've never heard of one before, but yes, the rifle team would also be a keeper.
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 04:15 pm
@engineer,
I think the Wealth Redistribution Team is too useful to cut.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 04:24 pm
@hawkeye10,
I started to hiss, but I have to think about this subject some more.
I'll give a toss at it as a first go.. even I will have arguments to my points:

~~ Academics is key. Now there's a sentence to avoid, already I'm in trouble, academics are key? That doesn't sound right either.

~ My schooling was strict, there were no snack stops. (Eat your breakfast - I know this sounds cold, but provide, somehow, breakfast for those unable to have it at home)
~ don't flutter up the school day with announcements of more than a few minutes.
~ I consider music and art part of academics and want them taught to all. I didn't have art even as a concept in high school, wish now I'd had a clue.
~ teach basic finance as mandatory, even if it is for relatively few hours, but you need to pass it to graduate.
~ I'm so odd I'd even give a basic construction class to all, including high end college preps. Same as basic finance, it opens windows to how the whole world is built. Math, physics, engineering could open up as interesting to those initially daunted by all that.

I'm sorry, even to myself - I think a really good school day would be full enough without sports, and I say that with my catholic grammar school team in the running for all city, or something like that, re chicago, and my university winning a national NCAA basketball title.

I think basic exercise physiology should be taught in high school - exercise and self connection can come from dance or solitary running or gliding through water, exploring the world, or, team sports. Engage students and they will act it out in time.

I know students need exercise and not to hang out at the corner store, knives flashing. I think that the rest of society needs to organize how that happens past the schools. Except that I get great teams are key to money re universities. Oy.






ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 04:38 pm
@ossobuco,
I admit speaking like a dinosaur here, and may even jump sides. However, I'd rather have all the kids who don't make the minors, never mind the majors, get an education in the hours they are forced to stay in school.

0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 04:40 pm
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:
I think the Wealth Redistribution Team is too useful to cut.
Yeah, OK, if thay hold the targets for the Rifle Team.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 05:00 pm
let's use Brighton HS Michigan as an example:

it has 2400 students
http://www.publicschoolreview.com/school_ov/school_id/39554

it spends $570,000 on sports
Quote:
Brighton offers 32 sports and fields 98 teams, enviable by any school's standards. But the district funds only 38% of the athletic department's nearly $1.5 million in expenditures; the other 62% is self-generated through fundraisers and fees, athletics director John Thompson says.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/preps/2009-09-02-budget_sports_cuts_N.htm

for a total of $240 per student, in a district that spends according to them $9,000 per student, which we know from Cato is almost certainly low ball. This gets us to sports costing 2.5% of the budget, which considering that younger kids in the district do not play sports is probably higher than the real number.

And schools can't make sports happen??
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 05:13 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
They are on the same team... Wealth Redistribution is easier to do when you have rifles.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 05:16 pm
@ebrown p,
ebrown p wrote:
They are on the same team... Wealth Redistribution is easier to do when you have rifles.
Yeah, the Rifle Team is easier to do, when thay have the Wealth Redistributers to shoot at.
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 06:01 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
No, no. The rifle team ARE the redistributers. Rich kids are sissys... they probably won't even waste much ammo.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 06:18 pm
I guess I'm rad, for teaching of basic exercise. Wish I'd learned that, took me to the jogging era to get a clue on my own. But, the whole sports scenario, no.
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 06:42 pm
@ossobuco,
I seem to be hanging out here against high school sports. I'm not against sport, but I am interested in making high school as good as it can be, for all, academically.

0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 07:11 pm
@boomerang,
boomerang wrote:
Plus, aren't students who participate in sports less likely to drink and do drugs? Seems like I've read that somewhere.

Or maybe the chicken and the egg of it was the other way round. Maybe coaches just don't want drunkards and junkies on their teams. The correlation in the data would seem to be the same.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 07:14 pm
@Thomas,
Quote:
Or maybe the chicken and the egg of it was the other way round. Maybe coaches just don't want drunkards and junkies on their teams. The correlation in the data would seem to be the same.


or maybe drunkards and junkies can't execute athletically??!!
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Apr, 2010 07:18 pm
YES! Cut the sports.

Let these kids parents pay for their own damn kids sports. When I was a kid nobody bought me my skateboards and I had to pay for the tickets on top of that.

Why do I have to pay for some goofy punks to run around in the grass in matching outfits chasing a ball.

PUT THESE LITTLE ASSHOLE TO WORK!

Get them ready for a real American future...HARD LABOR under my thumb.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Should cheerleading be a sport? - Discussion by joefromchicago
Are You Ready For Fantasy Baseball - 2009? - Discussion by realjohnboy
tennis grip - Question by madalina
How much faster could Usain Bolt have gone? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Sochi Olympics a Resounding Success - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/24/2024 at 11:26:25