THe PC Police Again Shut Down Truth Seaking

Bet if this was 1948 or so you would be coming up with the same nonsense about blacks being able to serve on equal terms with the whites.

You are working this from a top down analysis which is the incorrect method. You should be asking yourself how can we improve the combat arms so we achieve objectives and minimise casualties. You are saying you will force them to do what you want regardless...I hope you will suffer the consequences of your thoughtless opinion

Quote:

illustrating that those with homosexual servicemen are functional and accomplish their objectives.

The problem is not in an army moving from A to B with light resistance as in a guerilla war. The problem is in an all out fight for survival where the difference will be between who has the stronger morale. Men, women and homosexuals of both sexes do not bond the same as an all heterosexual male hunting group.

Quote:

Joe already mentioned the IDF and somebody else mentioned the UK's army. Both have gay soldiers.

The Korean War was the last time an army was under pressure for survival. The IDF does not women in combat roles, neither does the UK.

Quote:

You get awfully damn insecure about this topic.

As do you...but I am talking from experience.

You are talking from a motivation to be seen as a lovely person who has no faults involving political correctness. You think fighting in a war is a lovely experience where men and women regardless of sexual orientation will give their lives to prove they are politically correct. When absolute terror is clenching your gut so hard you think you are going to run away, the only thing that will hold you to that spot is the love of your brothers. Note no-one is sticking their cock in anyone else..it is more spritual than that and is based on instincts..the same instincts that cause revulsion in some at the thought of homosexuality or being inferior in the eyes of the camp trollop. The lowest common denominator is to have no sexual difference.

I am perfectly happy for women and homosexuals to serve in segregated units.

You're projecting your own inadequacy here.

On a topic about integration of open homosexuals, you use arguments about the integration of women which is a different topic.

You lack focus.

I made a statement about the IDF and UK allowing open homosexuals in, and you reply about women.

allowing the soldiers that are gay to be open about it

I am perfectly happy for women and homosexuals to serve in segregated units.

And if they are integrated, then what?

You'll do your job worse?

Sounds like you're the defective one; the one that lacks discipline.

You are working this from a top down analysis which is the incorrect method. You should be asking yourself how can we improve the combat arms so we achieve objectives and minimise casualties.You are saying you will force them to do what you want regardless

...I hope you will suffer the consequences of your thoughtless opinion. After all, it is only fair...I have put up with your opinion doing damage, now it is your turn.

There's no need to make this personal, Ionus.

How can my opinion, which isn't even opinion, be thoughtless when it describes the fact situation?

May your family fight and die in the next war serving in a ****-fest.

I am assuming you are too incapacitated to pass the medical, but there is hope the rest of your family will die when a unit fractures under combat stress.

After all, I am sure you would want to be represented when all my experience proves to be wrong.

What do I care that an insecure fool on a power trip thinks he knows everything about a topic that he read about in Gayboy international and Germaine Greer's the Female Eunuch.

I just hope you pay for your stupidity rather than sit safely at home.

Oh noes! I've been cursed by the wizard Ionus!

Surely now my family will meet an ill fate in a foxhole because two dudes next to them decided to have sex instead of fighting the war!

Your "experience" already has been proven wrong.

You provide enough Red Herring in a post to make Jesus envy your fishing savvy.

How many soldiers have died because of the loss of some specially trained (intelligence and linguistics) 1200 gay soldiers being discharged in the last decade? People are paying, but it's for the close-minded bigotry of idiots like you. Your inadequacy as a soldier need not be blamed on others.

How many soldiers have died because of the loss of some specially trained (intelligence and linguistics) 1200 gay soldiers being discharged in the last decade?

How dare you pretend to know anything about soldiering or stand in judgement of one. You low life piece of ****. Safe in your little cosy room ?

Col. Nathan R. Jessep: Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.
You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.

I wonder if this mouthy coward prefers to be the bottom?

How dare you pretend to know anything about soldiering or stand in judgement of one. You low life piece of ****. Safe in your little cosy room ?

Quote:

How many soldiers have died because of the loss of some specially trained (intelligence and linguistics) 1200 gay soldiers being discharged in the last decade?

a great many of those took the country for a ride.... they collected $200k in schooling, claimed that they were gay and got out, and then marketed their wares on main street. The military would love to put a stop to this theft. Changes have been made, for instance making soldier get dirty for a year or so before they can go to the schools, but the final fix is not having the gay "get out of the army when you want" card.

Quote:

How dare you pretend to know anything about soldiering or stand in judgement of one. You low life piece of ****. Safe in your little cosy room ?

you were thinking of this weren't you?

Quote:

Col. Nathan R. Jessep: Son, we live in a world that has walls and those walls need to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago and curse the Marines; you have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know: that Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives and that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.
You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties you want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use then as the backbone of a life trying to defend something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest that you pick up a weapon and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.