@McTag,
Quote:Very valuable, up to now, as a cement for society. To answer that fully would take us well off-topic, though.
I don't know that a proper answer would take us off topic. I'm inclined to think that it is the essence of the topic. The stories are one thing and the coverage of them by Media is another. Media coverage looks to have fish to fry that go well beyond the stories of these isolated incidents. And I have offered reasons why.
There is no way that the banking crisis was caused by anything other than the impetuosity of the passions which are whipped up by media in order for its profits to increase. So much so that the traditional reluctance to go into debt was set aside. The Church is an institution which restrains such impetuosity. It's decline would decrease that restraint.
Joe has spoken of some of his friends leaving the Church because of these stories and if he knows a few like that there must be a large number taking a similar stance in wider society and all as a result of media's stories about these deplorable incidents. Now you make think that the damage to the victims of these incidents is worse than the damage to the child victims of motor accidents, or occuring in larger numbers, but I don't. Nor of broken marriages which are very often the result of financial problems. Nor of bad diet which has horrrific effects of a permanent nature on millions of people and which is encouraged by media on a minute byminute basis.
So I think there is a distortion. And in the one case it is isolated and condemned by the Church and in the other it is not isolated and is encouraged by media.
The valuable aspects you mention you are used to taking for granted. Suppose they no longer existed.
Quote:Nowadays? I'm not sure if the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
If they no longer existed do you think it would make you more sure.
It is a question of emphasis Mac. There is no defence of the rouge priests from me. There is a question of how they are being used and why.