@msolga,
msolga wrote:I'd like to add a bit of clarification to my post from earlier in the day, if that's OK.
Its
OK; its your own thread.
msolga wrote:In an analogy between school bullies & cyber bullies, I said:
Quote:Possibly a life-long work habit of interacting with bullies in such ways
has influenced how I interact with people in general?
(Actually I do believe that most people have redeeming qualities.)
So perhaps that's how come I find myself interacting with trolls
(in my "lovely" way
) when some sort of reasoned interaction is actually possible?
In my own experience with this, I can only remember encountering ONE bully
during my lifetime; it was before I became a lawyer, working for the NY Stock Exchange.
One of my co-workers had an overbearing personality and he mouthed off too much.
The only way I found to deal with that was to
counter-mouth off in return;
i.e., show a refusal to tolerate domination. I recommend that to everyone,
tho preferably, avoid the offender, if that is convenient.
I say that knowing that some folks have (inaccurately)
accused ME
of being guilty of the misconduct in question.
I find it of some co-incidental interest that while we were on that job,
a statute was enacted requiring that we all be fingerprinted; too much theft of stock.
The bully was fingerprinted b4 I was. I made a little joke about his fingerprints
:
"definitely the criminal type." He took umbrage.
I left the job to attend law school. Within a few weeks of my departure,
I saw him on the evening news on TV. He was dragged away in chains,
having organized a gang to plunder the vault on-the-job and sell the stolen stock.
It turned out that I was correct: his prints really
WERE the criminal type.
David