Atheism

@cicerone imposter,

I'm not talking about "religion in many countries". And neither are you.

I know half a dozen Islamic families and the women run the show.

Of course it was a non sequitur and I explained why. You're just asserting. You can't derive a conclusion from pronouncements because they are pronouncements. You need to say what the pronouncements mean and attack that.

So get on with attacking fundie pronouncements on sexual morality because that's what this is all about. You wouldn't have the slightest interest in the matter otherwise.

1 Reply

@spendius,

Sorry, bub, but here's your exchange with edgar. I knew your skills in the English language lacks basic knowledge, but you flunk on several points; 1 you don't remember what you wrote a few minutes after you post what you write, and 2 your comprehensive skills just don't exist in the real world.

Quote:

@edgarblythe,

Quote:
Quote:
Atheists are of the ilk that would like to see humankind uplifted, not subjugated by fundamentalist pronouncements.

You,

Quote:
That is a bald non sequitur. People are not subjugated by fundamentalist pronouncements because they are fundamentalist pronouncements. They accept the validity of the morality which the pronouncements are intended to reinforce.

2 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

I know what the exchange with ed was about. It was a non sequitur.

As are your infantile assertions.

1 Reply

@spendius,

You don't understand what "infantile" means, because you've lived it all your life, and have not progressed beyond your local pub.

0 Replies

@cicerone imposter,

You're a fully-fledged misogynist from top to toe.

0 Replies

This just popped up on my background shifter - don't ever remember seeing it before - apparently degenerative brain diseases aren't all bad.

http://zs1.smbc-comics.com/comics/20071227.gif

1 Reply

@hingehead,

Amen preacher, "God wants a bigger goat.

0 Replies

Sorry, but I haven't posted in this thread in a while. Anybody found a deity yet? Just checking...

1 Reply

@FBM,

I did years ago and it lead me to conclude that adversarial political systems required that an opposition was in order to counter Her activities. Or at least inhibit them a little.

1 Reply

Nothing new on this front.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

I'll refrain from responding to that ed. I wouldn't refrain in a pub though.

1 Reply

@spendius,

You could not refrain from compulsively posting in atheist and science threads if your life depended on it.

2 Replies

@edgarblythe,

There are 24 threads on the first page of the Science forum. I have posted on 2 of them. There is no Atheist forum so I assume atheists are posting in religious forums.

Are your posts not compulsive?

That's the third time in two days that I have been singled out for doing what everybody else on here does as if my doing it is specifically odious. I'm seeking attention, I'm broadcasting my views and now I am compulsively posting on science and atheism threads.

Sheesh!! You lot must have everybody in your vicinity cowed.

How about you responding to the post of mine replying to JPB's snarky in a grown up way. Where did you get the idea from that the behaviour of Paula Broadwell and Jill Kelley is in any way wrong or untoward.

All women behave like that if they have the nerve, the chance and the attributes.

1 Reply

@edgarblythe,

John Bricker was Thomas Deweys running mate in 1944. I always think of spendi when it occurs what they said about Mr Bricker

"He is like interstellar space;A VAst Vacuum that occasionally meets with random cliches"

1 Reply

@farmerman,

That "they" said such a thing is not evidence enough to show that Mr Bricker was "like interstellar space ; a vast vacuum that occasionally meets with random cliches". I feel sure he could do punctuation better than you.

In point of fact Mr Bricker was no doubt nothing like that and the only possible conclusion for you to be sufficiently moved to think of me in that regard, for which I am grateful after you saying you didn't give a **** about me or my posts, is that you had a felt need to trot out such a weary old cliche due to having no adequate response to my last post.

And well might you not, indeed, what with you being a Special Undercover Agent of the Herd of Dyed-in the Wool Misogynists who every women who still retains a modicum of control of her wits should beware of exercising extreme caution.

0 Replies

@spendius,

spendius wrote:

There are 24 threads on the first page of the Science forum. I have posted on 2 of them. There is no Atheist forum so I assume atheists are posting in religious forums.

Are your posts not compulsive?

That's the third time in two days that I have been singled out for doing what everybody else on here does as if my doing it is specifically odious. I'm seeking attention, I'm broadcasting my views and now I am compulsively posting on science and atheism threads.

Sheesh!! You lot must have everybody in your vicinity cowed.

How about you responding to the post of mine replying to JPB's snarky in a grown up way. Where did you get the idea from that the behaviour of Paula Broadwell and Jill Kelley is in any way wrong or untoward.

All women behave like that if they have the nerve, the chance and the attributes.

Said after making about a billion posts on atheist/science threads.

I have not commented on Broadwell and Kelley.

1 Reply

@spendius,

spendius wrote:

I did years ago and it lead me to conclude that adversarial political systems required that an opposition was in order to counter Her activities. Or at least inhibit them a little.

Well, that assplains that. /thread

0 Replies

@edgarblythe,

Quote:

I have not commented on Broadwell and Kelley.

Why not? Everybody else has been doing. Well--not everybody of course. But you know what I mean.

The story has been all over our news and comment programmes.

Would you believe that I went to watch a hurdle race at Cheltenham on TV after typing "programmes" and the winner was "IFANDBUTWHYNOT" at 15--2.

1 Reply

@spendius,

Yeah? So?

0 Replies

If you were inventing a religion you'd think you'd go for points of difference with other religions. The borrowing of themes has always struck me as odd as using an idea from a religion you hope to usurp would seem to add weight to the veracity of that older religion.

Anyway, how true is this?

http://hateandanger.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/horus-attis-mithra-krishna-dionysus-jesus-christ.jpg

4 Replies

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know