2
   

Amirault case villainess running for Kennedy senate seat

 
 
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 12:09 pm

http://anncoulter.com/cgi-local/article.cgi?article=345

Quote:

...In July 2001, the notoriously tough Massachusetts parole board voted unanimously to grant Gerald Amirault clemency. Although the parole board is not permitted to consider guilt or innocence, its recommendation said: "(I)t is clearly a matter of public knowledge that, at the minimum, real and substantial doubt exists concerning petitioner's conviction."

Immediately after the board's recommendation, The Boston Globe reported that Gov. Jane Swift was leaning toward accepting the board's recommendation and freeing Amirault.

Enter Martha Coakley, Middlesex district attorney. Gerald Amirault had already spent 15 years in prison for crimes he no more committed than anyone reading this column did. But Coakley put on a full court press to keep Amirault in prison simply to further her political ambitions.

By then, every sentient person knew that Amirault was innocent. But instead of saying nothing, Coakley frantically lobbied Gov. Jane Swift to keep him in prison to show that she was a take-no-prisoners prosecutor, who stood up for "the children." As a result of Coakley's efforts -- and her contagious ambition -- Gov. Swift denied Amirault's clemency.

Thanks to Martha Coakley, Gerald Amirault sat in prison for another three years. ...


I say again, DA is too often the first rung in the ladder of political power for demmocrat pols, and too many of those careers are are constructed upon the blood of innocents.
 
Sglass
 
  0  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:10 pm
Wow arn't we justa can of worms this morning. The Amirault case was just sad, sad, sad.

But arn't we being a bit harsh on Martha Coakley? That she was seeking political favor or was it because she and your excellency, Govenor Jane Swift harbored thoughts that Amirault was guilty. Anyone with children are always more attentive to these issues.

Martha Coakley is a straight shooter , and I think she will be a fine senator for Massachusetts.
Sglass
 
  0  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:15 pm
@gungasnake,
With a name like gungasnake I don't much think that you are boston - irish - or catholic
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:27 pm
@Sglass,
In the past life, Martha Coakley most likely burned alleged witches at the stake. Remember, if the suspect drowns, she's innocent. If she doesn't then golly gee, she's a witch.

In another past life of hers, she actively tortured Jews and Muslims who wouldn't convert to Catholicism somewhere in 18th century Spanish village.

So let's sing Martha Coakley's praises because she knows that politically expedient issues are easy fodder to rile up the public to become her blind disciples.

We haven't had a good witchhunt in a very long time. Who should we lynch now? Remember, we don't need any pesky legal evidence to justify our moral AND political crusade.
roger
 
  2  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:41 pm
@tsarstepan,
Your examples pretty well sum up her mindset, so far as I can tell.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  2  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:58 pm
As of the last I ever heard, there was still one person rotting in a flori-duh prison for this same kind of fairytale **** and that would be Frank Fuster, a victim of one of Janet Reno's witch hunts.

I say again, this is the reason I cannot support a death penalty in America today.
0 Replies
 
Sglass
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 02:59 pm
@tsarstepan,
It's obvious you are not a Kennedy Democrat and you don't know the rules. Drunk Drunk Drunk
gungasnake
 
  3  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 03:00 pm
@Sglass,
Quote:
But arn't we being a bit harsh on Martha Coakley? That she was seeking political favor or was it because she and your excellency, Govenor Jane Swift harbored thoughts that Amirault was guilty.


If this bitch thought Amirault was guilty at the time in question, then she's a mental defective and should not be running for any sort of public office.
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 03:04 pm
@Sglass,
I'm a Democrat formerly from Massachusetts. I just don't support politicians who dive headfirst obvious political witchhunts such as the day care epidemic style witchhunts which involved -absolutely no physical evidence and involved tainted witness evidence.

Don't you realize your kneejerkish view parallels the like of Fox News more then the rational and thoughtful views of a typical Kennedy Democrat?
Sglass
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 06:26 pm
@tsarstepan,
Wait just one minute there Bratman, I wasn't jerking my knee, I was thumbing my nose.

Don't you understand you gotta do whatcha gotta do to get and keep the job.

Those Massachusetts politicians created the word DECLASSE. Now you don't have to be Irish to be a politician, but it helps. They got that Italian guy Mummbles Mimeno who is the mayor and owns the Nort' End - you don't know nuttin' kid - and Whitey Bulgar is the President of Southie.
Sglass
 
  0  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 06:28 pm
@Sglass,
Stick to poetry kid, you're wonderful.
Sglass
 
  1  
Reply Sat 2 Jan, 2010 10:45 pm
@Sglass,
Wonder what Janet Reno would do if she had been in Martha's shoes.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Jan, 2010 05:38 am
@Sglass,
You really don't know the answer to that one???
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Jan, 2010 09:43 am
@Sglass,
Sglass wrote:

Wow arn't we justa can of worms this morning. The Amirault case was just sad, sad, sad.

But arn't we being a bit harsh on Martha Coakley? That she was seeking political favor or was it because she and your excellency, Govenor Jane Swift harbored thoughts that Amirault was guilty. Anyone with children are always more attentive to these issues.

Martha Coakley is a straight shooter , and I think she will be a fine senator for Massachusetts.
Do u think she will treat the citizens as well as she did Gerald Amirault ?
Sglass
 
  2  
Reply Sat 9 Jan, 2010 10:25 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Probably much better than Janet Reno treated the Branch Davidians.

Don't see Martha trucking around with a can of kerosene and a book of matches.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Jan, 2010 10:56 am
@Sglass,
Sglass wrote:
Probably much better than Janet Reno treated the Branch Davidians.

Don't see Martha trucking around with a can of kerosene and a book of matches.
Yeah; good point; she did not burn him to death.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  2  
Reply Mon 11 Jan, 2010 06:52 am
@Sglass,
You really don't seem to know the history of Janet Reno and the 80's witch trials...

During the 1980s a modern version of the Salem witchcraft trials took place and these trials all involved daycare centers. Common to all such cases also were accusations of ritualistic sexual abuse of young children by more than one perpetrator, and the use of "recovered memories" as evidence in trials, and it was that last item which completed the loop with the Salem trials and medieval inquisitions.

The first such case was the infamous McMartin day-care case in Manhatten Beach, LA which you can read about. Afterwards, a number of such cases sprang up around the country and it seemed as if every unscrupulous DA in the land wanted one such case on his/her resume in something like the manner in which professional hunters want one elephant or rhino on their portfolios.

There were two exceptions, i.e. the sherrif of the one little lunatic town (Wenatchee) in Washington state, and Janet Reno, then the DA of Dade County, Flori-duh; those two attempted to make cottage industries out of putting innocent people in prison for imaginary crimes.

The three most notable victims of Reno's vision of this thing were named Grant Snowden, Bobby Fijnje, and Frank Fuster. You can find information on these people easily enough on the internet.

Fuster is still rotting in a Flori-duh prison for **** that never happened. Snowden was blasted out of prison after around 13 years by a federal appeals court in Atlanta after the Wall Street Journal made the heat on the case unbearable, and Fijnje's family fled to Holland after a heroic legal defense led to jury findings of innocence on seven of seven charges and Reno's henchpeople were preparing an entire new set of charges the same night as if the constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy did not exist.

Questions which remain unanswered include why nobody has ever sued Reno over any of this, and what would have motivated the KKKlintlers to appoint this lunatic bitch to be the AG of the United States. By way of contrast in a case with no national politics involved, the town of Wenatchee at one point was facing about a half billion dollars in lawsuits and was in real danger of becoming uninsurable; that of course would lead to the town being disincorporated and becoming a post office.









0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  3  
Reply Mon 11 Jan, 2010 09:36 am
How timely. Jim Ryan, who railroaded two innocent men and sent them to death row, is running for Illinois governor. I just wonder why gungasnake hasn't shown a similar amount of outrage about Ryan as he's showing about Coakley.

Oh wait, I just remembered: Ryan is a Republican. Never mind.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jan, 2010 11:05 am
@joefromchicago,
First I'd ever heard of this story. Thanks!
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Jan, 2010 11:36 am
@joefromchicago,
BTW, what would have been your reaction to George W. Bush appointing Jim Ryan to be AG of the United States, had that happened?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Amirault case villainess running for Kennedy senate seat
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/17/2025 at 01:31:53