3
   

100 YEAR OLD PEDOPHILE BEING RELEASED FROM PRISON

 
 
Sglass
 
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 02:50 am
100-Year-Old Sex Offender About to Go Free

Everything that pedophile Theodore Sypnier has to show for his 100 years on earth is packed in a single duffel bag as he prepares to begin a new chapter in life: freedom.

It's a chapter that prosecutors, judges and others who know him never wanted -- or expected -- to see written.

New York's oldest registered sex offender is scheduled to move by week's end out of a Buffalo halfway house for released inmates and into a place of his own, after completing his latest term in state prison for molesting little girls.

AP
Theodore Sypnier, 100, is about to be a free man.

The judge who sentenced him said at the time that she expected him to die behind bars.

But 10 years after his last arrest, as Sypnier prepared to shed the closely monitored lifestyle of the halfway house, its director warned that the spry and active Sypnier has not changed from the manipulator who used his grandfatherly charm to snare and rape victims as young as 4.

"Whether he's 100 or 101 or 105, the same person that was committing these crimes 10, 25, 30 years ago still exists today and has an unrepentant heart," said the Rev. Terry King, director of Grace House, which has twice taken Sypnier in from prison. "He is someone that we as parents, as members of the community, any community, really need to fear."

Six months after marking his 100th birthday in the Groveland Correctional Facility -- becoming the first New York inmate to reach the milestone while incarcerated -- the retired telephone company worker now says he wants to get to know the youngest members of a family that has disowned him.

"I'll tell them I never harmed any children," the father, grandfather and great-grandfather told his hometown newspaper, The Buffalo News.

A former daughter-in-law said he is not likely to get the chance.

"No one from the family plans to have any contact with him," Diane Sypnier said before ending a brief phone interview.

Being grandfatherly was how the 5-foot-5, 150-pound Sypnier found his victims, authorities say. After his most recent arrest at age 90 on charges of raping and sodomizing a 4-year-old girl and her 7-year-old sister, his neighbors in the suburb of Tonawanda recalled what appeared to be a kindly Sypnier offering rides to adults, handing out money to children so they could buy candy, and baby-sitting.

The victimized sisters called him "Grandpa," their mother said at the time, adding that it "was a total shock" when police showed her sexually explicit pictures of her girls found in Sypnier's apartment.

Sypnier's convictions date to 1987, when he was given three years' probation for sex abuse. He spent a year in prison for sexually abusing a minor in 1994. His neighbors in Tonawanda never knew of Sypnier's background because he was convicted before the adoption of laws requiring sex offenders to register with police.

A relative once came forward and said Sypnier had molested her while she was growing up, former Erie County prosecutor Frank Clark told the News. Authorities wonder what else might lie in Sypnier's past.

"People don't start to become pedophiles at 78," Erie County District Attorney Frank Sedita told the AP. "I call them vampires. ... This is something that's deep inside of them, and they won't want to stop doing this until they're dead."

But Sypnier says he is the victim of a miscarriage of justice, despite twice pleading guilty in the case involving the sisters.

"Those children crawled into bed with me because they were frightened, but there was never any sexual hanky-panky," Sypnier told the News.

Sypnier initially pleaded guilty in 2000 to two counts of rape, 15 counts of sodomy and endangering the welfare of a child for molesting the Tonawanda girls, as well as three in Buffalo. An appeals court threw out the conviction in 2002 after Sypnier claimed he was confused at the time, leading to another plea the following year to a lesser charge.

In sentencing Sypnier to as many as 10 years in prison, state Supreme Court Justice Penny Wolfgang told him she expected he would spend the rest of his life behind bars.

"The sheer notion of him wandering the streets unattended or unsupervised is a scary proposition," King said.

Sypnier was released on parole in 2007, only to be returned to prison in 2008 after failing to attend sex-offender counseling. He completed his term in November and will be on parole through 2012. Until then, he's forbidden from using e-mail, chat rooms or social networking sites; hanging around playgrounds or schools; or spending time in bars.

Instead, he spends his days watching television, cooking, socializing in the halfway house and attending programming, King said.

Sypnier's new address has not been disclosed, but the law requires him to enter it in the state's sex offender registry.

Although his age makes him New York's oldest registered sex offender, there is at least one older offender elsewhere. Bert Jackson of Utah is 103 and living under home confinement.
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 04:45 am
@Sglass,
Looks like longer life spans need to be taken into account!
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 05:43 am
@dlowan,
He should be given a chance to be a contributing member of society. Pwrehaps he can go to school, get a college education and become a professional in a service field .
We will look back on this many years from now and we will find him happily married with kids of his own.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 05:51 am
They should have paired him with an inmate that would break his arms and legs, long ago.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:15 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
He should be given a chance to be a contributing member of society.
Pwrehaps he can go to school, get a college education
and become a professional in a service field .
We will look back on this many years from now
and we will find him happily married with kids of his own.
In NY, convicted felons r ineligible to possess professional licenses.
Do rapists breed true?
Notice that he is using the Michael Jackson bed defense.
Maybe there was somatic evidence of rape.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:17 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

They should have paired him with an inmate that would break his arms and legs, long ago.
Then Y not just electrocute him or shoot him?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:42 am
@OmSigDAVID,
That would be illegal.
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:52 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

That would be illegal.
O, the other thing is legal.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 06:56 am
there comes a point when it is proven that one is too broken to be a part of society. When this happens, I always wonder why they are re- released.
Who cares if he is 100 or 200. He is still ALIVE, still able to talk, walk, and HAVE a life.. he should not be allowed into society. There should be an option for life in prison no matter what after a certain amount of re-offending if I am wording it correctly.
Especially for child molesters.
I would feel more comfortable if this person were a robber or something. Dealing with something simply material...Not children. Not babies. That is just not acceptable. We as a society have a duty to keep our young ones as safe as possible. When you KNOW someone will re-offend , has done so in the past, why is there not a stepping stone , no matter how unfair that keeps them behind bars.
jesus.. start giving him a mcdonalds hamburger everyday. Nasty asshole will die a 'natural death' very quickly at that age..
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 02:57 pm
@shewolfnm,
shewolfnm wrote:

there comes a point when it is proven that one is too broken to be a part of society. When this happens, I always wonder why they are re- released.
Who cares if he is 100 or 200. He is still ALIVE, still able to talk, walk, and HAVE a life.. he should not be allowed into society. There should be an option for life in prison no matter what after a certain amount of re-offending if I am wording it correctly.
Especially for child molesters.
I would feel more comfortable if this person were a robber or something. Dealing with something simply material...Not children. Not babies. That is just not acceptable. We as a society have a duty to keep our young ones as safe as possible. When you KNOW someone will re-offend , has done so in the past, why is there not a stepping stone , no matter how unfair that keeps them behind bars.
jesus.. start giving him a mcdonalds hamburger everyday.
Nasty asshole will die a 'natural death' very quickly at that age..
For many years, I have advocated BANISHMENT
or other permanent ISOLATION of violently felonious recidivists.
This guy apparently was an actual rapist, not just a "child molester".
That term sounds very vague; too vague.
If a child shows up at the wolf's lair to celebrate Christmas
and u kiss her on the cheek, u shoud be safe from long term incarceration.

I have advocated that rapists, murderers, robbers, burglars, car thieves,
arsonists, kidnappers, assailants or ANY actually violent felons be prevented
from having access to the decent people.

I am aghast that u prefer robbers above "child molesters"
(whatever that means); I 'm not sure where u draw the line
on that definition. If u mean rapists, then OK.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  0  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 03:11 pm
In this specific case, I have to agree with David. Shocked Embarrassed Mr. Green Drunk
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 05:03 pm
@edgarblythe,
Emotionally, not legally speaking.
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 07:02 pm
@edgarblythe,
My comments really are addressed to all readers of this topic. Perhaps I don't need to say this; but I will, anyway. The impact of sexual abuse in the lives of children is devastating. Their lives as adults are adversely affected. I have seen this personally in the lives of individuals I've known over the years.

My former best friend was married to an incest victim. (Incest truly is a special case of pedophilia.) His now ex-wife was repeatedly raped by her maternal grandfather, starting when she was about five. (Incidentally, the monster had victimized his daughter, my friend's future mother-in-law, when she was a very young girl.) When the young daughter of my friend and his wife reached that age, my friend's wife (the mother of the young girl) started undergoing a process of mental deterioration, experiencing flashbacks of assaults by her grandfather. As I indicated, my friend and his wife eventually got a divorce. The evil of her grandfather (who had passed away by this time) lived on after him, reaching beyond the grave to hurt his great-granddaughter (who, of course, was devasted by her parents' divorce) whom he did not live long enough to see and even me when I lost my best friend, as an indirect result of this tragedy.

Another friend of mine had to be incarcerated in a mental institution when he suffered a nervous breakdown in 1966 (if I remember correctly) at the age of 17. He had been terrorized by friends of drug-dealing "jocks" at his high school, whom he had reported to the police when they tried to get him to take drugs. While he was in the mental institution, not only was he beaten by interns; but also he was raped by a pedophile, a muscular man in his 40s. My friend never received treatment for his abuse, because at the time this crime was committed, it was believed that men never got raped. Today he still has nightmares and suffers from post traumatic stress syndrome. He has never been married. He is a 58-year-old virgin because the sexual assault traumatized him so badly that he was left without any sexual urge at all.

In a fair and logical world, pedophiles would be SHOT without mercy. Just my opinion.
wmwcjr
 
  0  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 07:13 pm
@wmwcjr,
I should also point out that the American Civil Liberties Union provides pro bono representation for NAMBLA, which is the North American Man/Boy Love Association. The ACLU, what a nice bunch of guys!
Green Witch
 
  2  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 07:46 pm
@wmwcjr,
Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Hmmm, I don't see an asterisk excluding pedophiles. As much as I don't like sexual predators, and I prefer they remain incarcerated, they have been given the right of free speech under our Constitution. My fantasy is to shut up people like Ann Coulter and Glen Beck, but of course, if that could happen then the Constitution would just be a worthless piece of paper. You may not like everyone who the ACLU represents, but the bottom line is they protect the first amendment.
wmwcjr
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 08:03 pm
@Green Witch,
Hi, Green Witch. I think the Founding Fathers would be amazed to learn that pedophiles have a Constitutional right to instruct each other on how to seduce and entrap children. What particularly galls me is that the ACLU seems to relish representing the most evil people around. I say let NAMBLA pay for their legal representation in court out of their own pocket. There are far more deserving people entitled to pro bono representation. The ACLU also believes that child pornography, which definitely is not victimless, is protected by the Constitution. I'm not speaking as a political conservative; I'm actually ideologically independent and personally apathetic about politics. (I'm just an oddball.) Incidentally, my friend who was raped by the pedophile is liberal on many issues. There was a time when he strongly supported the ACLU, but that was before the ACLU started defending NAMBLA. Another friend of mine who is a sociology professor and is very liberal politically and is also an atheist (in other words, not a right-wing alarmist) has told me that there is an organized conspiracy of pedophiles to infiltrate institutions that deal with children. I'm not meaning to be confrontational, and I respect people's opinions. I just feel very strongly about this issue for personal reasons.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 08:12 pm
@wmwcjr,
I was initially in sympathy with you. Now I'm not so sure.
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  4  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 08:19 pm
@wmwcjr,
Speech is not the actual crime. I know it's hard to see it that way in a situation such as this, but we cannot put people in jail for what they believe or say. They are only criminals once they act. I lost many members of my family to the Nazis and the ACLU also defends them, but I do not think the ACLU should stop offering them their services. Same for the Klu Klux Klan who they also have represented. Sometimes it is best to let people speak- if for no other reason then it tells you what they are up to.
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 08:24 pm
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:
Sometimes it is best to let people speak- if for no other reason then it tells you what they are up to.


exactly

0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Dec, 2009 09:15 pm
@Green Witch,
Green Witch wrote:

Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Hmmm, I don't see an asterisk excluding pedophiles. As much as I don't like sexual predators, and I prefer they remain incarcerated, they have been given the right of free speech under our Constitution. My fantasy is to shut up people like Ann Coulter and Glen Beck, but of course, if that could happen then the Constitution would just be a worthless piece of paper. You may not like everyone who the ACLU represents, but the bottom line is they protect the first amendment.
Your point is well taken, Green Witch.
The First Amendment was not enacted to protect POPULAR SPEECH.
Willie Sutton had a right to stand on a soapbox and extol the glories of robbing banks.

Bruno Hauptman had a right to tell us how nifty kidnapping is.

Someone else has the right to tell us how great the graduated income tax is.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 100 YEAR OLD PEDOPHILE BEING RELEASED FROM PRISON
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 09:03:44