Tiger Woods in Car Accident

@dyslexia,

Quote:

some of us (not saying who) often wonder just what "sexual normal" actually is, Please hawkeye fill us in.

Tiger is outside the norms: If you want to argue the point I am game, but you are too smart to make the attempt, cause you will lose...

Quote:

UsMagazine.com describes an erotic dream that Tiger Woods reportedly sent Rachel Uchitel, one of his alleged mistresses. According to the web site, Woods told Uchitel in an email that he envisioned her having sex with Derek Jeter and Bones star David Boreanaz at the same time. The juicy email describes his fantasy in lurid detail:

"I had a dream we were married and I was leading the tournament," Woods reportedly wrote. "I came home, excited to see you, and there you were in the bedroom getting f--ked by Derek and David [Boreanaz]. Some part of me thinks you would like that."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/04/tiger-woods-dream-derek-j_n_380697.html

Also goes to support my point that Tiger needs the danger...this was off the charts recklessness.

1 Reply

It will be interesting to see if the wife can be paid to stay. The reports are that two years will cost $5 mil, plus a rewrite of the prenup. I am not sure if that buys any bedroom action, but I am sure that Tiger being the Tiger he will figure out his supply chain as he goes.

0 Replies

@hawkeye10,

Quote:

If you want to argue the point I am game, but you are too smart to make the attempt, cause you will lose...

you are a silly goose.

1 Reply

@dyslexia,

life is short:
Must. Have. Some. Fun!

1 Reply

@hawkeye10,

Quote:

life is short:
Must. Have. Some. Fun!

That could be Nike's new slogan (and they could even keep Tiger as the spokesman- he could be holding a golf club and winking at the camera -it would fit).

You know if you think about his life - all the discipline and structure his Dad began placing on him at the age of three or whatever and how all his options were narrowed down to this one constricted path - again from the age of three or whenever it was his Dad put the golf club in his hand- it's little wonder that he obviously felt the need to be unconstricted in other areas of his life.

Was he wrong? Yeah - he shouldn't have misled or hurt his wife - but is all this sexual acting out perverted, necessarily? I don't think so. At least I haven't read anything that sounds particularly perverted - it sounds like he's just promiscuous and needs to constantly reassure himself in terms of his power and allure.
It's a little strange that he dreams of his girlfriends with other guys - I wonder how Derek Jeter feels knowing he's a player in one of Tiger's dreams....but again, that's just a manifestation of his own insecurity in terms of the pinnacle of power he's reached. He has to reassure himself - even in his dreams- that he really belongs up there beside Derek Jeter and Michael Jordan and Charles Barkley and the rest of those guys.

Something I read said that he seemed to lose his moral compass when his Dad died, but if you think about how influential his father was in every aspect of his life, it may be safe to assume he didn't ever need to develop his own moral compass - he always had his father directing and dictating his every action.

Now Dad's gone and he has no one to tell him what the right step to take is and no one to make him do or be what he might not really want to do or be anymore. Maybe he never did want to do or be what he became- maybe that was all his Dad. He certainly has done a whole hell of a lot to sabotage the whole thing. That might be an indication of how much it all means to him (as opposed to his handlers). Who knows?

2 Replies

@JTT,

Quote:I said:

Quote:

Oh good - and what would he have said about the fact that I've NEVER sucked my thumb?

JTT answered

Quote:

That you shouldn't feel guilty about starting.

Yeah well, I think that's just Freud's way of making himself feel better about his own oral fixation- if everyone is allowed to have one - his becomes less noticeable.

Besides - I already have an overbite.

0 Replies

@aidan,

aidan wrote:

Something I read said that he seemed to lose his moral compass when his Dad died, but if you think about how influential his father was in every aspect of his life, it may be safe to assume he didn't ever need to develop his own moral compass - he always had his father directing and dictating his every action.

Now Dad's gone and he has no one to tell him what the right step to take is and no one to make him do or be what he might not really want to do or be anymore. Maybe he never did want to do or be what he became- maybe that was all his Dad. He certainly has done a whole hell of a lot to sabotage the whole thing. That might be an indication of how much it all means to him (as opposed to his handlers). Who knows?

I don't know why the death of a parent would result in someone losing their moral compass. And a strong parent doesn't indicate, to me, the inability to develop one's own - rather, the opposite. If his father had been guiding, directing him all his life, he'd certainly have learned some morals, enough to behave properly towards the one he loves.

His behaviour isn't perverted to me; it's immoral. And immoral behaviour is a choice, not a disease or mental condition. We ALL know right from wrong, moral from immoral, ethical from unethical, so ignorance is not a viable, valid defence. He's plain and simply a pig. Selfish, inconsiderate, and uncaring. I'd dump that guy in a nanosecond. Take my 5 mil, the rewritten prenup, a few houses, huge alimony, and the kids. He doesn't deserve a wife.

1 Reply

@Mame,

Quote:

I don't know why the death of a parent would result in someone losing their moral compass. And a strong parent doesn't indicate, to me, the inability to develop one's own - rather, the opposite. If his father had been guiding, directing him all his life, he'd certainly have learned some morals, enough to behave properly towards the one he loves.

Um hello - maybe you should reread what I said which is this:

Quote:

Something I read said that he seemed to lose his moral compass when his Dad died, but if you think about how influential his father was in every aspect of his life, it may be safe to assume he didn't ever need to develop his own moral compass - he always had his father directing and dictating his every action.

Now Dad's gone and he has no one to tell him what the right step to take is and no one to make him do or be what he might not really want to do or be anymore. Maybe he never did want to do or be what he became- maybe that was all his Dad. He certainly has done a whole hell of a lot to sabotage the whole thing. That might be an indication of how much it all means to him (as opposed to his handlers). Who knows?

I didn't say he lost his moral compass when his father died. I said maybe he never had to develop one because he had first his father and then his handlers directing his every move from a very young age.

You believe whatever you want to believe - and I'l believe what I want to believe. Is that alright?

1 Reply

@aidan,

Quote:

Now Dad's gone and he has no one to tell him what the right step to take is and no one to make him do or be what he might not really want to do or be anymore. Maybe he never did want to do or be what he became- maybe that was all his Dad. He certainly has done a whole hell of a lot to sabotage the whole thing. That might be an indication of how much it all means to him (as opposed to his handlers).

That is about what one of the hot numbers he has been banging said, except that she is of the opinion that Daddy only cared about producing a golfer, never taught Tiger to be a man, and no one else did either.

Ill bet that you are closer to the truth, that he fucked it up on purpose, where-as she has it that he is a lost boy.

Quote:

but is all this sexual acting out perverted, necessarily?

Might be right. We dont know.....yet.

0 Replies

@aidan,

Having others around you to guide and direct you doesn't preclude you developing your own moral compass, aidan. That is way too simplistic and leaves him unaccountable for his own actions.

The guy's a pig.

And yeah, we can certainly agree to disagree, go with our own views. You're always trying to infuse every single thing/action with deeper reasons than they necessarily deserve. You try being a bit more simplistic and I'll try being a bit more whatever it is you are, and maybe one day we'll meet in the middle and actually agree on something.

3 Replies

@Mame,

I think I'd rather just go on being myself. Is that an option?

1 Reply

@aidan,

If you're happy with that, then sure.

0 Replies

Does anyone have an opinion for what Tiger gets for $60 million (it is claimed) to have his wife not leave and not disclose for two years? Obviously everyone will assume that she is staying for the payday, so I dont see where her standing by his side helps him. Is this really $60 mill to keep her quiet for two years?

Is she now paid staff? Is whore service included? I mean really, this makes her look bad to be sure.

3 Replies

@Mame,

Quote:

You try being a bit more simplistic and I'll try being a bit more whatever it is you are, and maybe one day we'll meet in the middle and actually agree on something.

It'd probably be easy for Aidan to be a bit more "simplistic", Mame, but what's good about simplistic viewpoints? Seemingly, by your own admission, that might be too high a mountain for you to climb.

1 Reply

Walk a mile in Tiger's shoes.
You are a fit, attractive, athletic mega-rich sporting superstar.
Your job involves almost constant travelling.
Beautiful women keep throwing themselves at you.
What to do?

1 Reply

@McTag,

Keep your zipper up!

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

I don't know, I might weaken by the 50th attempt on my honour.

0 Replies

@Mame,

Quote:

The guy's a pig.

Well Mame-- obviously he's a pig. He's a mammal and if you ask a scientist they will tell you that they are all the same physiologically. I'm a well-evolved microbe in case you didn't know. My very strict scientific education led me to no other conclusion. The pseudo-scientists on A2K are having you on. They think they are professors of geology and other fatuities. It takes many lines of print to say what some of them are and what they are doing and they like having it repeated.

They are such sophisticated Christians that they have forgotten it and are thus enabled to pick and choose which parts of Christian theology to adhere to and which to reject something like a sophisticated lady going through the racks in the supermarket fashion department deciding which shroud will get the chaps a-drooling.

There's no need now to evolve sexual stimulation signifiers. It's such a drag. Technology is a lot faster. Think how long it would take to evolve a tounge stud. And genital ironmongery doesn't bear thinking about.

As a pig, or a man, or a stag, he instinctively reacts in an evolved instinctive way, which, by definition, he can't help, to females displaying the appropriate signal. Some mammals shake their antlers at such signals. Some their mane.
Some make a sound such as "Do you come here often you gorgeous hunk of lascivious promise?"

What happens after that is common knowledge and it would be an insult to the intelligence of A2Kers to attempt a description of it.

What is all this "moral compass" stuff Mame. Your Christian slip is peeping out there. There's a biological compass as well and some physicians think it is inadvisable to ignore it. Is your "moral compass" just those aspects of Christianity which suit the Lady Party whilst ignoring the aspects that don't.

And the cannibals call human flesh "long pig" because of how similar we taste to roast ham.

I can't understand why he ever got married in the first place. It was asking for trouble and, as hawk implies, he thrives on trouble. Not that I agree. Games requiring concentration also require no trouble.

Unless, and I speculate here, somewhat fancifully I'll admit, it has all been staged as an explanation for a decline in form caused by age and ennui which it is not American to demonstrate, and thus requires a snow job to disguise it, whilst also supplying media with a range of diluted sexual stimulations with which to tittivate its customers and suggest ideas they can weave into their conversations about this important matter.

1 Reply

@spendius,

spendi wrote:

Quote:

Well Mame-- obviously he's a pig. He's a mammal and if you ask a scientist they will tell you that they are all the same physiologically. I'm a well-evolved microbe in case you didn't know. My very strict scientific education led me to no other conclusion.

The biggest problem with spendi is his inability to separate what is considered "physiological resemblance" to the actual differences of the two animal species. A pig will never create a computer.

1 Reply

@cicerone imposter,

And a computer will never create a microbe never mind a pig which is a computer anyway according to the real materialists as opposed to those softies who feel it is intellectually sound to be able to pick and choose from the fruits of materialism.

And they can smell a truffle at fifty paces wheres a computer can't even tell when the beer's gone off.

Computers are easy to understand once you know that the on/off switch can represent two arithmetical digits which are themselves capable of representing any number you could think up.

1 Reply

Tiger Woods in Car Accident

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know