Tiger Woods in Car Accident

oh, not another one...

Yup, I had the same reaction, but thought better of responding. These guys still live in the 18th c.

After all these years I still think Spendy may be putting us on.

I think you mean 'whores/wives'. Apparently they're interchangeable and one can't escape being the other (in some peoples' minds).

Oh that's a relief - you can't be talking about me because I hate air air conditioning.
I'm interested though - what do you see them competing for- what's the prize?
You or spendius?

How did this get to be about the feminists? What do they have to say about Tiger anyways? One should think that they would fully support the rights of women to have sex with Tiger, and then take some of his money. To include his wife.

The hope was that Tiger would grow a set of balls, get out there on Oprah and cry a little......but nope. Now he is going to quit golf so that he can go into hiding full time.

Stick a fork in him, he is done. He will try to come back in a splash in about a year, but he has already cowered, his competitors will eat his lunch.

You are dreaming girl !
One of the main arguments for not giving women the vote was that they would vote on appearance. It turns out this is entirely correct. But in the visual based era we live in, so do men. FDR would never have been elected in the TV era.
The womens movement (I like that term, it makes it sound like something a pet did on the carpet) started as a terrorist organisation, throwing acid in people's faces. There is some interesting sexual psychology in that act.
For the record,
I was shocked when as a child I found out that at one stage women did not have the right to vote.
I believe in equal money for equal work.
I believe in the right to vote.
I do not believe in affirmative action.
I do not believe the womens movement now is about anything more complex than a minority of women who cant sexually compete with other women.

You haven't been a woman, have you..

Anyway, on Tiger, I am thinking he's a spoiled brat, with a perhaps odd father and mother and career channeling extraordinaire, and self developed coccoon, and a reaction to that coccoon.. I've liked him as a golfer. (I used to read about Hogan and Tommy Bolt and others, back in my teen access to weird library books). I'm mixed on being sorry for the wife. Am definitely sorry for the children dealing with this.

It would be interesting to see if promiscuity in marriage is supported by women, seeing as how it tramples over the rights of another woman. As for taking his money, what did they do to earn it ?

I have trouble believing he had a stuning wife, healthy kids, wanted for nothing and failed to keep his dick in his pants. So stupidly undisciplined....

Very sad. I hope they have more character than their father.

I guess Jack Nicholas will remain my golf hero.

I used to like the aussie golfer, Jack Newton. Remember he walked into a propeller drunk ? He lost an arm, an eye, as well as some serious injuries. There was a good joke going around after, how much force does it take to stop an aircraft ? Ans : Half a Newton.
How much force will it take to stop Tiger...

Finally, he does something sensible.

Promiscuity in marriage (a perjorative word there), I could understand it if the couple was ok with it - and if not promiscuity, the odd lover here or there. There are a variety of takes on this in different societies. I'm the steadfast type in marriage myself. Outside of commitment, for me, bets are off, money never involved. I've always been near dismissive of money and its machinations, undoubtedly to my detriment. I'm older now, out of the loop, but I haven't had that quiet a life.

The cast about assumptions re women being all about money are at first glance anachronistic to me. On the other hand, I gather this still goes on and on.

That was a "main" argument? Who advanced it, the Neanderthals or the Chimps?

Love your post! LOL

It was the gorillas.

(pejoratives..)

I can not understand how any partner, male of female, was worth millions of dollars during a marriage simply because the money is there for the taking during the divorce. Originally, it was to prevent abandoned children and good women falling into prostitution. What is its purpose now except to make employment for some lawyers.