14
   

moon bombing

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 13 Oct, 2009 08:45 am
@joefromchicago,
I've always wondered how people can live down under, but if they've got a breathable atmosphere ...
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Oct, 2009 11:14 pm
http://twitter.com/LCROSS_NASA

Quote:
# “And what's this thing coming toward me very fast? So big and flat and round,
4:34 AM Oct 9th from web

# it needs a big wide sounding name like 'Ow', 'Ownge', 'Round', 'Ground'!”
4:34 AM Oct 9th from web

# “That's it! Ground! Ha! I wonder if it'll be friends with me?”
4:34 AM Oct 9th from web
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:32 pm
Looks like the bomb-data is saying there's sub-surface water on our moon.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:43 pm
@littlek,
. . . and California is going to court to get it.
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:44 pm
If ya gotta explode bombs to get it, how ya gonna build a base there?
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:45 pm
gonna make swimming dangerous
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:47 pm
I think they bombed it to see if it was there - to expose it. It's not much good to us exposed as it'd evaporate. I think we'd sink some sort of plumbing into the ground to extract it.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 05:50 pm
@littlek,
That's what they do with the Oglallah Aquifier. Course, the plumbing has to be deeper each time they make a new hole.

I guess I'm just being pessimistic. My thoughts are like "Oh goody, new territory to exploit.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:00 pm
At least we won't be taking it from anyone or wrecking ecology (or maybe I'm not so sure about that last point).
roger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:06 pm
@littlek,
Probably no ecology. Still, if you use more than you put back, you are going to run out. I don't know if that's a problem, or not.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:09 pm
@roger,
but what about the moon men

http://www.swordandsorcery.org/images/herc%20moon%20men%20-%20metal%20man.jpg
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Nov, 2009 06:15 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

. . . and California is going to court to get it.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 10:58 am
I knew there'd be mention of moon men, but I like the picture better!
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 11:06 am
@littlek,
If there was groundwater of sorts on the moon wouldn't it make the cheese moldy?


http://johngushue.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451f25369e20115721c3d8e970b-800wi
Wink
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 11:07 am
@tsarstepan,
"more tea, grommet?"
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 11:07 am
@tsarstepan,
Indeed, or maybe it'd just keep it from drying out? Maybe we should send Wallace and Grommit back up to check it out.
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 11:29 am
@littlek,
Quote:
Maybe we should send Wallace and Grommit back up to check it out.

I wholeheartedly agree. This needs to be NASA's next great expedition!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 12:21 pm
Yesterday --

(CNN) -- NASA said Friday it had discovered water on the moon, opening "a new chapter" that could allow for the development of a lunar space station.

The discovery was announced by project scientist Anthony Colaprete at a midday news conference.

"I'm here today to tell you that indeed, yes, we found water. And we didn't find just a little bit; we found a significant amount" -- about a dozen, two-gallon bucketfuls, he said, holding up several white plastic containers.

The find is based on preliminary data collected when the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, or LCROSS, intentionally crashed October 9 into the permanently shadowed region of Cabeus crater near the moon's south pole.

After the satellite struck, a rocket flew through the debris cloud, measuring the amount of water and providing a host of other data, Colaprete said.

The project team concentrated on data from the satellite's spectrometers, which provide the best information about the presence of water, Colaprete said. A spectrometer helps identify the composition of materials by examining light they emit or absorb.

Balance of article:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/11/13/water.moon.nasa/index.html
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 12:27 pm
is sting going to whip up a rewrite of one of his police songs

"little sips are what you'll take
drinking on the moon"
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 14 Nov, 2009 12:29 pm
@djjd62,
Ill bet that the "water" theyre talking about is bound up as hydrates or hydroxides in minerals, like drywall.
Youd probably have to mine it and bring it to a reactor to extract water and maybe oxygen. Then youd create a nice pile of "mine tailings"
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
Amanda Knox - Discussion by JTT
 
  1. Forums
  2. » moon bombing
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 12/28/2024 at 03:40:39