@Brandon9000,
Quote:You say that you're not angry, but this would strike most people as expressing anger:
Then most people would be wrong, and to insist upon that is an
argumentum ad populum fallacy. You can't see my face, nor my posture, nor hear me speak nor hear the tone of my voice. You have absolutely no clue what my emotional state is at any time that i post anything.
Once again, it is puerile to attempt to suggest your interlocutor is angry in a lame attempt to suggest that yours is the voice of sweet reason while your interlocutor is in the throes of irrational emotion--which is the only reason you wish to insist that i'm angry. Don't kid yourself, Bubba, you're just not that important to me.
Yes, when you attempt to imply that Mr. Obama possesses an authority which he does not in fact possess, that is dishonest. It only becomes a lie, however, if you state it outright, so it is your paranoid fantasy that i've said you are lying.
Really, this is pretty sad. If you are that sensitive, you really have no business engaging in debate. If the kitchen's too hot, don't go in there. I've launched far worse at many people, and happen to have a high opinion of your intelligence. I just don't consider that you employ it when politics enter the picture.