Reply
Thu 3 Sep, 2009 08:11 am
(CNN) -- Former "Manson Family" member Susan Atkins, who stabbed actress Sharon Tate to death more than 40 years ago and now is terminally ill, was denied parole Wednesday, prison officials said.
Susan Atkins, shown here after her indictment in the Manson murders, was denied parole again Wednesday.
Susan Atkins, shown here after her indictment in the Manson murders, was denied parole again Wednesday.
Click to view previous image
1 of 3
Click to view next image
The parole hearing was the 13th for Atkins, 61, who is battling terminal brain cancer. Held at the Central California Women's Facility in Chowchilla, California, the hearing stretched to more than nine hours.
The panel set another hearing for Atkins in three years, said Michele Kane, spokeswoman for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
Atkins was 21 when she and other followers of Charles Manson participated in a two-night rampage that left seven people dead and terrorized the city of Los Angeles in August 1969. She and the others -- Manson, Leslie Van Houten, Patricia Krenwinkel and Charles "Tex" Watson -- were initially sentenced to death in the slayings of five people, including Tate, and two additional deaths the following night.
Yes! She showed no mercy for Sharon Tate or her unborn baby either!
So she dies in jail peacefully - her victims didn't have the luxury to live that long!
strange as it may seem, I don't find that the locale of susan atkins death of significant importance to merit my consideration. I'm thinking there are way too many current issues of significance.
@dyslexia,
Quote: I don't find that the locale of susan atkins death of significant importance to merit my consideration. I'm thinking there are way too many current issues of significance
Then why'd you bring it up you old fool.
@dyslexia,
The good news is Susan Atkins will have government paid for health care until the end of her life.
Let her rot in prison. For those of you who are too young to remember the Manson incident, suffice it to say that it was one of the most disgusting displays of sadistic behavior of which I had ever heard.
@farmerman,
kiss my go-to-hell fartface.
@Phoenix32890,
Phoenix32890 wrote:
Let her rot in prison. For those of you who are too young to remember the Manson incident,
suffice it to say that it was one of the most disgusting displays of sadistic behavior of which I had ever heard.
If even
ONE of Sharon 's guests, or Sharon herself
had just
one revolver or pistol - it woud have granted them decades of life
and that baby 'd be 40 years old now.
Its better to
HAVE a gun and not NEED one
than it is to
NEED a gun and
not HAVE one.
In a predatory emergency,
BEGGING n
grovelling have not always been
the most effective ways to control the situation. Ask Sharon Tate.
David
I don't believe in shortening the sentence for those on life without parole.
David, that old armor has rusted away and the windmill has been replaced by a turbo generator.
@parados,
parados wrote:
The good news is Susan Atkins will have government paid for health care until the end of her life.
That argument doesn't hold water in my book.
She won't be alive that much longer for us taxpayers to support her medical care. I saw the figures somewhere of how much it costs. I consider it money well spent.
What? Are we supposed to release any prisoner that has a terminal illness?
Imagine the explosion of AIDS patients, for instance, pouring into the population, if that were to happen.
Plus, taxpayers would foot most of the bill for their care outside, anyway.
@dyslexia,
strange as it may seem, I don't find that the locale of susan atkins death of significant importance to merit my consideration. I'm thinking there are way too many current issues of significance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes the question is if you do not consider it a matter of concern why did you start the thread?
Seem a very strange position to take on a thread that you had created to say the least.
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:
Quote: I don't find that the locale of susan atkins death of significant importance to merit my consideration. I'm thinking there are way too many current issues of significance
Then why'd you bring it up you old fool.
Nothing gets by you Bill.
@BillRM,
I did indeed start this thread with a simple post of a news item, sometime later I posted by comment re that news item. Billrm you seem to have taken a very strange position re this thread.
@BillRM,
i often start news threads with no other purpose than getting news and information out and about, not everybody spends a lot of time on news sites
@dyslexia,
Quote: kiss my go-to-hell fartface.
Keep givin me **** and Ill put ex lax in your Earl Gray.
We're definitely not in Scotland eh?
@Ceili,
Alert the media. She can read a map.
In my opinion, its a tempest in a teapot: she 's as good as dead already.
Its 6 or half a dozen whether thay let her out for ten minutes b4 she falls over or thay don 't.
@OmSigDAVID,
They should announce a 100% cure for stage 4D metastatic brain cancer at , say, Johns Hopkins, and then deny her parole to goget it done. That would be cool and give some smiles to the folks whose lives she helped destroy.
Rot in whatever hell you can imagine , bitch
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace