@mysteryman,
mysteryman wrote:Quote:Bullshit. You'd be hard pressed to find examples of the Dems going out of their way to support white, male causes each and every time, and put minorities and their causes down, the way Republicans do.
The civil rights act was opposed by many if not most dems and only passed because the repubs supported it.
I'm calling bullshit on this one. You shouldn't just make things up, MM. According to Wikipedia, this was the voting breakdown:
The original House version:
* Democratic Party: 152-96 (61%-39%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)
The Senate version:
* Democratic Party: 46-21 (69%-31%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)
The Senate version, voted on by the House:
* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 136-35 (80%-20%)
(
Source at Wikipedia, for which the article cites its source)
The first number is those voting for, and the second voting against. The Democrats voting for the Act overwhelmingly outnumber those voting against. This doesn't even remotely support your claim that most Democrats voted against it.
Where do you come up with **** like this?
By the way, if you look at their figures further, you'll see that no Republicans from the South voted for the Act, and that among those from the other states, the number of Democrats voting for the Act outnumber that of Republicans voting for the act. Of course, the Democrats controlled the Congress in 1964, so this would not be unexpected. But your claim that possibly even most Democrats voted against the act is even remotely borne out.