Here are some other possibilities, Jinmin.
In contemporary society, we experience [are in] more comfortable and convenient lives than before, which can mainly be attributed to [the] technological advances. So some individuals assert that students [majored] majoring in science should receive more financial supports from the government than [the] other students. For my part, I believe
this opinion is groundless.
Admittedly, supporting science students [with more money] has some advantages. To begin with, science students could be encouraged to dedicate themselves to [diligent] studies that more directly benefit society. Money can be applied as a good motivation for students, especially for impoverished students. In addition, more financial support enables students to do more scientific research[es] independently. As is known to all, scientific research[es] usually requires [calls
] [for] a large amount of money.
However, the drawbacks of more support [ing] [more] for science students cannot be ignored. In the first place, it is unfair for other [major] students majoring in other fields. Everyone is born[e] with different talents, and if they have remarkable achievements in their subject[s] fields, they should also be [distributed to] given (or) allowed equal financial support.
Due to this absurd idea, the students in other fields are bound to be stripp
some financial assistance. Moreover, science is only one aspect of human civilization. If the government devotes a larger share of national budget to the science students, citizens will have an impression that science is the most essential enterprise in the whole of
society. Obviously, that [it] is not realistic. Science can contribute to high quality of our lives which are based on both material and mental aspects.
In conclusion, the downside of supporting more money to science student outweighs the upside of it.