AL GORE SHUD TAKE BETTER CARE OF EMPLOYEES

Forums: Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

AL GORE SHUD TAKE BETTER CARE OF HIS EMPLOYEES

It is unconscionable that Gore sends chicks
to the edge of communist North Korea, all the more so
in the knowledge of its hostile nuclear weapons development program.

The commies have been capturing Americans since at least the 1960s,
when thay grabbed a US Navy ship the Pueblo.
It was very foreseeable that the commies, like a black hole,
woud grab them if it coud; predictably, it DID.

SHAME on Gore.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,324 • Replies: 29

No top replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Ah come on David. They probably jumped at the chance to go. I don't imagine that Al Gore had to twist their arms.

If I had the opportunity to go, I would.

Newspaper folk are a different breed.

1 Reply

@Sglass,

Sglass wrote:

Ah come on David. They probably jumped at the chance to go.
I don't imagine that Al Gore had to twist their arms.

If I had the opportunity to go, I would.

Newspaper folk are a different breed.

MINIMALLY, he had obligations as a gentleman.

2 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

Ah come on David, being a gentlemn has nothing to do with being a responsible business man. Gentleman no, humanitarian yes.

Obviously Jung is star struck with Bill Clinton and would not settle for anything less. This stance worked to our advantage to get the ladies their freedom.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

MINIMALLY, he had obligations as a gentleman.

I try to be at least sympathetic to your minds workings DAve, yet Im stuck on a fact that you feel there is no moral or legal obligation implicit in a Hipocratic oath taken by a physician, yet here you are enumerating Obligations that Al Gore had in this situation.

Maybe consistancy IS the bugaboo of a small mind but at least you wont smack-up on the wrong side of the road if you practice the rules.

1 Reply

@Sglass,

Quote:

Ah come on David, being a gentlemn has nothing to do
with being a responsible business man. Gentleman no, humanitarian yes.

Gore does not represent himself to be a hot-shot capitalist.
He does not support laissez faire free enterprize, as I do.
This is not and shoud not be seen as a question of business profit.
Yet, as a gentleman, if it had been ME,
I 'd have protected the ladies from the commies,
especially on the basis of their gender.
That 's what a gentleman does.
SOUTHERNERS claim to be better gentlemen than the rest of us.
Gore 's from Tennessee.

Quote:

Obviously Jung is star struck with Bill Clinton and would not settle for anything less.
This stance worked to our advantage to get the ladies their freedom.

It was very foreseeable that the commies 'd exploit the situation, if possible.
Accordingly, Gore shud not have allowed even male employees
to approach that hell -- much less females.

David

0 Replies

@farmerman,

Quote:

MINIMALLY, he had obligations as a gentleman.

Quote:

I try to be at least sympathetic to your minds workings DAve,

That 's nice of u.

Quote:

yet Im stuck on a fact that you feel there is no moral or legal
obligation implicit in a Hipocratic oath taken by a physician,
yet here you are enumerating Obligations that Al Gore had in this situation.

MJ's M.D. is in danger of both civil n criminal litigation
for (probably) carring out the demands of his patient, MJ;
i.e., he is in legal jeopardy.
Not so, Al Gore.
I accuse him only in the court of public opinion,
qua decency and honorability.
I do not propose vengeance against Al Gore; no one does.
The M.D. shoud be so lucky. There is a difference.

Quote:

Maybe consistancy IS the bugaboo of a small mind but at least
you wont smack-up on the wrong side of the road if you practice the rules.

I am innocent of inconsistency, as per above.

David

0 Replies

The ladies are back on U.S. soil, thanks to Al Gore and especially Bill Clinton. Al wanted to go, but North Korea wouldn't let that happen...they wanted a bigger symbol to come and get the women released. Can I assume you don't think Bush was much of a gentleman to allow American women soldiers to serve and die or get maimed while fighting in Iraq????? Come to thank of it, I'm not too happy that he sent American men to fight a bogus war based on finding weapons of mass destruction.

I don't like to bust your bubble Dave, but there are American women all over the globe working for the U. S. government and I'm pretty sure they decided all on their own to apply for the positions. These women sometimes travel in very dangerous areas and they know the risks, obviously they hope to avoid harm and come home safely, but it's a dangerous world around us.

1 Reply

@glitterbag,

glitterbag wrote:

Quote:

The ladies are back on U.S. soil, thanks to Al Gore

The ladies were on North Korean soil,
thanks to Al Gore.

glitterbag wrote:

Quote:

and especially Bill Clinton. Al wanted to go, but North Korea wouldn't let that happen...they wanted a bigger symbol to come and get the women released. Can I assume you don't think Bush was much of a gentleman to allow American women soldiers to serve and die or get maimed while fighting in Iraq?????

I do not consider myself to be a friend of either of the Bushes.
When Reagan chose Bush for VP, I disapproved n said so.
Neither Bush had any choice about females in the Army.
That was the law. The Bushes were substantially limited by the law.
The only thing thay coud do to protect the females
was to ignore the aggressions and the threats of Saddam.
We had information of Saddam 's developing various WMDs
that Saddam actually USED against the Iranians and against the Kurds,
so we KNEW that he had them. That was not an illusion.

By the time that we got there, with the speed of a glacier,
Saddam had gotten rid of them.

I was apprehensive that Saddam 'd attack us with smuggled nukes
or other WMDs out of vengeance for our ejecting him from Kuwait.
Hence, I strongly approved of violently removing Saddam.
From that point forward: the mission was accomplished.
Our troops shoud have been brought home, the same as Bush
brought them home from Panama, after he overthrew Noriega.

glitterbag wrote:

Quote:

Come to thank of it, I'm not too happy that he sent American men to fight a bogus war
based on finding weapons of mass destruction.

For MY part,
I am glad that Saddam is not around to be able to nuke us,
when he gets around to it. Possible sources of nukes were
1. the Russians, right next door, replete with semi-starving scientists, and
2. the Red Chinese.

glitterbag wrote:

Quote:

I don't like to bust your bubble Dave, but there are American women all over the globe working for the U. S. government and I'm pretty sure they decided all on their own to apply for the positions. These women sometimes travel in very dangerous areas and they know the risks, obviously they hope to avoid harm and come home safely, but it's a dangerous world around us.

True.

0 Replies

You object to these women going and putting themselves in harms way? You seem to think that a man putting himself in harms way is noble. Should women be prohibited from such noble service?

T
K
O

1 Reply

@Diest TKO,

Diest TKO wrote:

Quote:

You object to these women going and putting themselves in harms way?

Not exactly; a gentleman shoud not have sent them to do it.
He shoud have protected them, on the basis of their gender.

Quote:

You seem to think that a man putting himself in harms way is noble.

I did not say that.
Where do u get that ?

Quote:

Should women be prohibited from such noble service?

I doubt that government has jd to stop them from endangering themselves.
However, we shoud revert to the status quo ante as to military and naval service, that chicks r not expendable.

David

0 Replies

@OmSigDAVID,

"Chicks"?

Maybe he's an equal opportunity type of employer? Girls can do the same sorts of work as the boys? And go to the same sorts of places?

My understanding was that they mistakenly entered Nth Korean territory. I don't know that you can blame Gore for that.

1 Reply

@msolga,

msolga wrote:

"Chicks"?

Quote:

Maybe he's an equal opportunity type of employer?
Girls can do the same sorts of work as the boys?
And go to the same sorts of places?

He and thay proved that,
and we know how.

Quote:
My understanding was that they mistakenly entered Nth Korean territory.
I don't know that you can blame Gore for that.
I CAN. I DO.
He shoud have told them to go nowhere near there.
Sending them there was a dishonorable act,
for exposing chicks to danger. That shoud not be done,
except only in the most extreme emergencies.

Kim Jung Ill is nuts.
In theory, thay coud have been shot.

Thay are not expendable.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Well hey, they aren't the first journalists ever to be captured & held hostage by hostile forces. Mostly men, as I recall.

Quote:

He shoud have told them to go nowhere near there.
Sending them there was a dishonorable act,
for exposing chicks to danger. That shoud not be done,
except only in the most extreme emergencies.

Kim Jung Ill is nuts.
In theory, thay coud have been shot.

Thay are not expendable.

Are you suggesting that he might have told them to venture into dangerous territory? Wink

Of course they could have been harmed. Maybe they needed better maps Wink

but I don't know how you can blame Gore for a mistake that they made.

1 Reply

@msolga,

msolga wrote:

Quote:

Well hey, they aren't the first journalists ever to be captured &
held hostage by hostile forces. Mostly men, as I recall.

Chicks are not expendable. Thay shoud be carefully protected.
Their employers shoud be very careful to avoid
exposing them to danger. Maybe have them cover Disneyworld.
Thay shoud be safe there, under Disney 's protection.
He has yet to lose anyone to Kim Jung Ill.

Quote:

He shoud have told them to go nowhere near there.
Sending them there was a dishonorable act,
for exposing chicks to danger. That shoud not be done,
except only in the most extreme emergencies.

Kim Jung Ill is nuts.
In theory, thay coud have been shot.

Thay are not expendable.

msolga wrote:

Quote:

Are you suggesting that he might have told them to venture
into dangerous territory?

I have no way of knowing
what language was employed in designating their work assignment,
but apostori reasoning suggests that it was lacking in safety precautions.

msolga wrote:

Quote:

Of course they could have been harmed. Maybe they needed better maps
but I don't know how you can blame Gore for a mistake that they made.

Blame him for not sending them somewhere that s SAFE and nowhere near Communist Korea.

David

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

Blame him for not sending them somewhere that s SAFE and nowhere near Communist Korea.

OK, that your fixed position & nothing anyone here can say will change it.

0 Replies

U accuse me of being closed minded
for failure of willingness to send chicks to or near a communist hell.

1 Reply

@OmSigDAVID,

Quote:

U accuse me of being closed minded

Yes, I do.

1 Reply

@msolga,

msolga wrote:

Quote:
U accuse me of being closed minded

Yes, I do.

Well, OK.
Maybe I am, with respect to the point in question.
I don 't like the idea of chicks getting hurt.
In the same circumstances, I 'd have been more protective than Gore was.

I began this thread to make the point that Al Gore
shoud have been less willing to risk female lives of his employees.
I will stand by what I said.

0 Replies

OK!

0 Replies

AL GORE SHUD TAKE BETTER CARE OF EMPLOYEES

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know