@bloosmudge,
Hi Bloos,
In a way, I agree with sully on some things, not on others.
Hi Sully,
Everyone is entitled to pre-wedding jitters...the thing in debate is whether it is actually pre wedding jitters, or not.
I personally don't think that sending naked photo's of yourself to a girl under an assumed identity is something classed as 'baggage', or 'pre wedding jitters'.
Looking at the circumstances of the naked photo :
- it wasn't 'circumstance' (eg. a work colleague) that he fell for her (enough that he wanted to get in her pants), because he sought her out online
- he's sought her out under an assumed identity - so this wasn't an identity he uses for his friends. It was made for a specific and secretive purpose.
- using an assumed identity - that other girl he was trying to have sex with, doesn't truly know who he is.
- it wasn't something that 'just occurred' : he was actively trying to make that relationship grow / occur / deepen / hot up (by sending the naked photo)
- this happened only 2 months prior to the wedding...ie. he was trying to get laid 2 months before he got married
Honestly, the bondage sights that he visited...Bloos, you may or may not have a problem with that - it depends on how into it he is, and whether he can do without it. That's hard to find out. I do think in relation to this, you
may have put too much weight on it (but again, you haven't really supplied much info on this).
But the naked photo thing (if you want monogamy) is a bigger issue, because it speaks about his nature/character.