0
   

"What's wrong with Iraqis paying for their liberation?"

 
 
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 12:43 am
Some US Senators,. feeling the Bush Economic Recovery economic pinch, want to charge Iraq for the US's war of regime change underwritten by that country's oil. The Bush Admin. is increasingly keen on the idea.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-uscost273471078sep27,0,5226907.story?coll=ny-nationalnews-headlines

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A30556-2003Oct1.html

Some would argue that making Iraq pay for its own invasion was already planned for by the Bush Admin. before the war when they thought that freely flowing Iraqi oil would pay for the invasion, and would line oil corp. investors' pockets with skimmed profits.

The war, it was thought then, would pay for itself and make Bush's oil corp. cronies richer. All would have been well, that had it had ended well.

A proud American and Bush supporter on another forum site asked, "What's wrong with Iraqis paying for their liberation?"
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 648 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
JoanneDorel
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 09:43 am
Hmm, perhaps because they did not ask to be a colony of the US.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 10:26 am
I have a constitutional aversion to paying for that which i have not ordered. I suspect the Iraqis would feel the same.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 10:37 am
Especially when you have had no say in the manner in which it were spent.

But there is mud in the water: if the "civil administration" (read whatever reconstruction that they can keep under this nomer) of Iraq be funded by it's newly open access to the global petrolium market I think the administration can get away with it.

They have been saying this all along. The plans for reconstruction of Iraq were counting on the petrolium exports.
0 Replies
 
Sofia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:47 am
Quote:
They have been saying this all along. The plans for reconstruction of Iraq were counting on the petrolium exports
Yup.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 11:55 am
its a lose-lose proposition, if we take back funding for reconstrution via loans, we add to the already huge debt of Iraq as well as substantiate charges that we were after the oil in the first place. If we grant the funding for reconstruction, we assume huge debt to an already burdened US economy. Perhaps if we had not acted sans UN scantion, this problem would be less severe for all involved. We made our decision and now its our debt.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Oct, 2003 12:00 pm
Having read this
Iraq will be poor 'for years',
I even have some more doubts than the above mentioned reasons.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

T'Pring is Dead - Discussion by Brandon9000
Another Calif. shooting spree: 4 dead - Discussion by Lustig Andrei
Friends don't let friends fat-talk - Discussion by hawkeye10
Before you criticize the media - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Fatal Baloon Accident - Discussion by 33export
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
Robin Williams is dead - Discussion by Butrflynet
 
  1. Forums
  2. » "What's wrong with Iraqis paying for their liberation?"
Copyright © 2020 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 08/11/2020 at 04:58:18