15
   

SHUD THE CAPTAIN BE RANSOMED FROM PIRATES ?

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 10:09 am
@cicerone imposter,
"cicerone imposter" wrote:
Quote:
Pirates should not be "rewarded" with any ransom, but shot out of the water.
That's the only lesson they understand.
Otherwise, you play by their rules, and we will never get rid of them.

By paying what they ask, we only exacerbate the problem in the future.
Why should they stop if it works?
Sometimes you have to sacrifice a few for the many in the future.
That's also the reason pirate activity continues to increase.

We 've not agreed ofen before, C.I.,
but we agree now !





David
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 10:36 am
Great minds think alike they say. So it's reasonable to assume that unutterably stupid ones do too if only by a process of elimination.

hamburger
 
  3  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 10:41 am
@hawkeye10,
hawk wrote :

Quote:
Re: hamburger(Post 3622977)
Sweet Jesus! Countless NGO's and Governments have poured tons of money and time into trying to help the Somalians do something worthwhile with their country, they always refuse to do anything constructive. They are the textbook definition of "victim".


jesus would weep if he would see millions of people - many innocent children - being forced to starve .

how do you expect a country that was trampeled upon for decades - with the silent and not so silent approval of western nations - to quickly became a "civilized" country ?
(i don't even know if there is a "civilized" country anywhere in this world ) .

Quote:
poured tons of money and time into trying to help the Somalians do something worthwhile
much like in afghanistan and other downtrodden countries , the money is hardly ever given to the starving people of the country but given to families already in power .
i'm sure you must have read how president karzai of afghanistan and his family suck up much of the aid-money flowing into the country .

interesting to me , that karzai was able to move back and forth between afghanistan and western countries whenever he felt like it , but many pennyless refuges can never make it even out of their village .

it should be kept in mind that much of africa was under the control of european states for about 200 plus years before finally being "set free" after WW II .

in the 1960's the soviets and the U.S. started to use parts of east-africa and its governments to play out their politics of "control over the region" .
by now the wreck that was created by western nations over more than 200 years has been largely abondoned - but oil , diamonds and other resources are still mainly controlled by western conglomerates .

you may want to call upon jesus to see if he approves of the treatment of the downtrodden and poor of the world .
hbg

summary about somalia put together by the BBC .
while it is not an exhaustive study of the somalia of the past and the present , it at least gives an overview of the many problems of the region .

link to BBC summary :

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/country_profiles/1072592.stm

and for good measure :

http://progressive.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/article.php?article_id=313

Quote:
The nation of Somalia, located on Africa's east coast, is described by the New York Times as "the most violent, hungry and smashed-up country in the world." On the Fund for Peace "Failed States Index" for 2008, Somalia ranks as #1.
........................
If the current African Union peacekeeping forces leave a power vacuum in Somalia, the western world may be in serious trouble. The mixture of a powerless government, a fundamentalist influence, and a demographic susceptible to extremism makes the country exceptionally dangerous. Just like in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, a centralized, democratic government must stabilize the nation. Economic growth to curb extremism is paramount. The West cannot afford to ignore Somalia, and it certainly cannot afford to forget it.


hawk :
i am sure you can find many more articles and books describing the somalia of the present and the past .

as i said in my first post here : "i do NOT approve of piracy , but i also do NOT approve of millions of people starving " .
perhaps you can understand my point of view - perhaps you can't - that's entirely up to you .
i'm not posting to convince you of my point of view being the "right and only one " - it's simply my "point of view" .
hbg
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 10:48 am
@hamburger,
I'm in sympathy hbg.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:20 am
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

Great minds think alike they say.
So it's reasonable to assume that unutterably stupid ones do too if only by a process of elimination.

Referring to C.I. & myself ?
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:23 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

spendius wrote:

Great minds think alike they say.
So it's reasonable to assume that unutterably stupid ones do too if only by a process of elimination.

Referring to C.I. & myself ?
the captain has been freed
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:31 am
@dyslexia,
well now what are we gonna bitch about?
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:35 am
President Obama, knife clenched between his teeth and brandishing an aka 47, after shooing away the Navy, dove in the water. A short time later, three pirates were dead and the captain was freed,
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:35 am
@djjd62,
djjd62 wrote:

well now what are we gonna bitch about?
I'm hoping for a review of Michelle touched the queen.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 11:36 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

President Obama, knife clenched between his teeth and brandishing an aka 47, after shooing away the Navy, dove in the water. A short time later, three pirates were dead and the captain was freed,
The communist/socialist saves america singlehandedly.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:31 pm
@dyslexia,
dyslexia wrote:

edgarblythe wrote:

President Obama, knife clenched between his teeth and brandishing an aka 47,
after shooing away the Navy, dove in the water. A short time later,
three pirates were dead and the captain was freed,
The communist/socialist saves america singlehandedly.

If he were a better American,
he 'd have used an M-14 instead of a commie gun.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:37 pm
Since Maersk was going to PAY the pirates a ransom to free the Captain:
now, it shoud pay it to Capt. Phillips, since he liberated HIMSELF.

In any case, he shoud now return to his ship,
since he is the Captain, and bring it safely back to America.





David
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 12:55 pm
@hamburger,
Quote:
as i said in my first post here : "i do NOT approve of piracy , but i also do NOT approve of millions of people starving " .
perhaps you can understand my point of view - perhaps you can't - that's entirely up to you .
i'm not posting to convince you of my point of view being the "right and only one " - it's simply my "point of view"


Yes, we all have our opinions, some of them can be better supported with facts and evidence than others. Somalia is a tragedy, no one here as of yet has disputed that, let's all shed a tear for the suffering of the Somalians. However, those who don't want to help themselves can't be helped. Somalians are evidence of the truth of this.

we can't fix Somalia until the Somalians decide that they want something better for themselves, until then civilization must do our best to mitigate the damage that the failed state that is Somalia, the anarchy on that patch of Earth, inflicts upon us. Cry for them all you want, but it will not help them, or us. Me, I'll wait for some evidence that these backwards people want to rejoin civilization before I give a **** about them.

Yes, I can understand your point of view. Can you understand mine?
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:11 pm
@hawkeye10,

R u trying to give anarchy a bad name ?
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:13 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
If he were a better American,
he 'd have used an M-14 instead of a commie gun.


I rarely agree with you gun loving freaks, but in this case I do. The correct action is to shoot with the intent to kill any individuals who are currently conducting piracy along the Somali coast. The Pirates don't care if they die, and neither do I.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:14 pm
@hawkeye10,
I can but you might tell media not to keep showing us the pictures of it. If we are not going to do anything about it what's the point of showing it to us. It spoils our enjoyment for nothing.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:19 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
you should type slower, you left letters out of two words again, it's, are you, not r u
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:25 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:

Quote:
If he were a better American,
he 'd have used an M-14 instead of a commie gun.


I rarely agree with you gun loving freaks, but in this case I do.
The correct action is to shoot with the intent to kill any
individuals who are currently conducting piracy along the Somali coast.
The Pirates don't care if they die, and neither do I.

I don 't know, but I SUSPECT that a certain fiberglass lifeboat
is very multiply perforated now.

We (meaning the Navy)
need to find and sink or capture the pirates' mother ships.
Put them out of business by annihilating their infrastructure.





David
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:33 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
We (meaning the Navy)
need to find and sink or capture the pirates' mother ships.
Put them out of business by annihilating their infrastructure


The "mother ships" were the dingies that they set out from shore on originally, but they then capture fishing boats to use as a base for going after the ships. If you sink a pirate boat you are often sinking the property of a civilized owner. Much better I think to concentrate on killing pirates, we (civilization) should try to get our property back.
MontereyJack
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Apr, 2009 01:40 pm
True, David,but the problem is, it's a huge amount of sea, and one of the most heavily traveled shipping areas in the world. which means you have a LOT of anonymous ships there, and the mother ships probably look pretty much like a hundred other old and well-used freighters going about their legitimate business. Remember the distances involved too--when it happened I remember reading the nearest warship was 300 miles away--that's maybe seven hours sailing time--usually by the time it could get there the hijacking would be over and the ships long gone. It was only by luck they got there in time this time.

From what I read, they're not stealing fishing boats but using high-powered speedy small boats which are much faster and more maneuverable than huge freighters.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/25/2024 at 01:10:38