MONTANA TALK TO ME

i'm seeing your thread on my main page and i vote up each of your posts to keep it visible

scanning quickly.. I read this as

" I want my P M S "

Fountainofdrama is voting everyones posts down that doesnt agree with it.

But, I have not seen anyones post disappear.. I jjust see them as 0 or negative if they have gotten to that point.

On the main page, the threads that are 0 or negative.. those are being collapsed for some reason no matter someones settings.

I doubt fountianofdrama is doing that

Montana,

A good clinical definition of a scoiopath is one who can empathize only with himself. FOW exhibits this trait in the extreme. Whether this is all a contrived game or the quasi "authentic" outpourings of a personality is impossible for any of us to know. However, in either case there is nothing in it for anyone other than the author.

This phrase from FOW in your "private" thread let off some alarms;

You have no basis whatever for the required declaration of faith.

agreed and more, OB1

George, and unfortunately those sociopaths prey on the trusting, gullible ones.

This is painful to watch. Like a car crash on the highway, a train wreck, a lion taking down a gazelle.

i hope everything gets resolved and that FoW stays, she/he/it's such a complete wackjob, i love it, like poking a nest of hornets

with a stick!

reading along with the other thread, oof, cringe worthy stuff

it is horrid. I cant believe anyone is buying that ****.


and for some reason I cant stop looking.

He actually said: "I hate negativity"

Montana, sweety, why are you engaging him?

if FoW, hadn't made the statement about being a writer i'd be skeptical of some of the stuff, but given that revelation, each post sounds like a pitch for a new movie of the week

okay, i'm a guy who never wins, i save the girl, but she's not interested, so i become a courier who works part time for MI5, and then.......

Do some of you know how much you're insulting me?

and then i went undercover to bust a gang of nazi's working the docks.......

Sorry....delayed while getting lunch on the table.

I have no problem with and would welcome having the PM feature back Jane. All I did was suggest that, if possible, the ignore feature should apply to PMs too when we really want to ignore somebody who is being particularly offensive or abusive or just excessively annoying. Used to, offensive/abusive posts were deleted and/or what were judged to be offensive threads were locked and/or the offending member was expelled for awhile which generally displeased about half the population too. Now the board is self-governing which has its downsides and also its upsides.

I sympathise and agree with you that if members do not communicate what they want and/or don't want, then the board gods have no way of knowing. On the other hand, the chiefs ultimately have to call the shots and, even though I have seen members being heard and accommodated, there is no way they can please everybody. Sometimes they just have to decide to do what is expedient for them.

I honestly don't believe the board gods are intentionally withholding PMs from us. I just think it is a pretty complicated and time consuming code issue that they haven't gotten to yet.

Okay, back to our previous programming.

i really truly hope you guys work it out

i call shenanigans on FoW's part but the posts are interesting

I do see that Montana. I do.

No, Montana, it's only their fondness and caring for you that is showing.

However, there's one that thinks you are stupid and that one is FOW..