Gender Challenge: Am I a woman or a man?

I suggested asking questions, then deducing from my answers, my gender. I really didn't want a load of frankly obnoxious patronising piffle.
You are not qualified in Psychology, to any level. Or you wouldn't say any of the things you said. You were talking nonsense. Your words were intended to demean and humiliate. That makes you a bully. An inadequate. I despise you.
Question your anger. And your assumptions.

resorting to sarcasm or ridicule should be considered an aggressive act. Abuse should not be tolerated. Never be judgemental. i have tried to be supportive.

i don't need your sympathy. Your personality sucks. You are pathetic and inadequate. I have no need of you. Go and impress some other group of inadequates. You don't impress me.

I am assuming from your cautious attitude you have some training in Psychology.

i don't need your sympathy. Your personality sucks. You are pathetic and inadequate. I have no need of you. Go and impress some other group of inadequates. You don't impress me.

David...you are right. It is not a necessary conclusion.

But with an IQ of 160...she should be able to construct a sentence that doesn’t have that ambiguity.


By the by, since this thread is just about done…I just discovered that you are from NYC.
How is it that you have never joined us for coffee, a drink,
or just some park time for discussion?

FOW is a woman but loudmouthed like a man and full of anger, at that.

you know you really exhibit narcissist behavior and becoming pretty boring at that.

My guess...woman...but a very conflicted woman with a huge attitude

Gender Challenge: Am I a woman or a man? Fount is confused on other issues, as well.

Exactly what I was thinking. Variant or deviant?

and..as to your comment about what's inside -- Well, what's inside you? Why not end the charade or game and identify? You dragged this game out beyond the point of entertainment value. Hear that sound? That's people walking away.

(Editorial comment: This was on Page 9.)

Why d'ya think so, Brandon (not that I really, really give a crap whether this naval-gazing idjit is either, but just for the sake of polite conversation...)?

I agree with Intrepid...this sort of dynamic is all too familiar. I think she/he/it has done this sort of ruse before, particularly by the tone of the defensiveness and attempts at blunting any criticism as others being hostile even when they are not.

Forgive me for saying so, but you are annoying -- as you intend to be -- but it
gets on one's nerves after a while.

it's not a choice you've offered, but i'm gonna guess douche bag

haha douche bag it is

I'm not abusing you, it just struck me as an attention ploy. Of course, I may be wrong, but i think, if you were SERIOUS about learing about gender stereotypes, you'd make another account and explore discreetly, rather than inviting people to make unintelligent assumptions on little fragments of information.

i would and do accuse you of attention seeking, and would if you were any of the following, man, woman, vegetable, mineral, hermaphrodite, transexual bi-polar midget, politician (sorry that's a little cruel)

This thread is obviously attention-seeking. A true sociological or psychological exercise would be impersonal. A sociologist or theoretical psychologist would never insert themselves as the subject of their study. The attention-seeking charge may annoy you, Fountofwisdom, but it is a valid criticism. You are being self-indulgent. There is one word which you have used more often than any other: "I".

question for you....Why in the world should we care if you're a man or woman?

This kind of statement and the generalities you make about Americans...are the reasons I conider you rude. They are also the reason that I agree you were NOT bragging when you claimed an IQ of 160. You were lying. Anyone who reads what you have to say who thinks your posts are the work of an individual with a genius IQ...is an idiot!

If I am wrong about your IQ...which I seriously doubt is anywhere in the genius range...why don't you start acting and posting commensurate with the gift. If you are the immature, conflicted girl I suspect you are……keep right on posting what you have been posting. It really is entertaining……and as even you suggested earlier……we are here to entertain and to be entertained.

However, I don't think this is a particularly intelligent thread. Fount, you have to admit that- and the reason everyone is trying to fault you is that anyone who claims to have genius IQ is going to be picked to pieces regardless of how intelligent they actually are, and a lot of your logic in this thread is flawed.

I'm positive that I was mistaken that this would be an entertaining thread. I see no one abusing you. I see rebuttal and much deserved criticism. If you can't take the heat (of criticism), then get out of the kitchen.

(Editorial comment: The previous post was by one who left out
out of boredom on Page 9. It is now page 15. )

wow, you really are a pathetic creature damn, too bad that's not one of the choices

Seriously, I don't see abuse..but I do see what I call heat and criticism. The fact that you haven't YET revealed your gender makes it annoying . What I object to I think here is feeling manipulated for the benefit of your "study". Especially when I think of a possibility that you could've been on A2K prior to this doing this same sort of debate with, say, the topuic of having sex with minors or some such hot-button topic. Not saying you did this, but that sort of dynamic happens all-too-frequently.

nasty? really? you are way too defensive and immediately jump to conclusions as you see fit... which is why i have the impression you lack self confidence and generally feel insecure in your skin.

No, I guess if you had more of a backbone you'd be standing up for yourself.

I don't read Penthouse or find it stimulating or read its letters page.