63
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 12:18 pm
Cicerone Imposter wrote:
Quote:
Your Wiki link lead to a donation site

The link works here in england, here's a screenshot of part of the article-
http://imageshack.us/a/img546/3153/b629.jpg

Oralloy wrote:
Quote:
who exactly would be manufacturing these suitcase nukes?

The bits and pieces could be donated from various places such as Pakistan, Nth Korea and Iran, and the end user would assemble them in a shed.
The tactic of infiltrating countries with suitcase nukes is not a new one-
"Does America realize the meaning of every Iraqi becoming a missile that can cross to countries and cities?" -Saddam Hussein, September 29, 1994
Like I said, the muslim world may feel it has just cause to hit America because of America's support for Israel-
[Koran 17.33]- "And do not kill any one whom Allah has forbidden, except for a just cause"
oralloy
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 01:04 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:
oralloy wrote:
who exactly would be manufacturing these suitcase nukes?

The bits and pieces could be donated from various places such as Pakistan, Nth Korea and Iran, and the end user would assemble them in a shed.

None of those three nations could hope to even dream of making a suitcase nuke.

And the notion of "different nations donating parts which could then be assembled into a working nuclear weapon in a shed" is goofy nonsense.


Romeo Fabulini wrote:
The tactic of infiltrating countries with suitcase nukes is not a new one-

It is a tactic that has yet to ever be attempted.


Romeo Fabulini wrote:
Like I said, the muslim world may feel it has just cause to hit America because of America's support for Israel-

If so, that is a good reason to expand the drone-strike program.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:07 pm
Romeo said:
Quote:
The tactic of infiltrating countries with suitcase nukes is not a new one

Oralloy wrote:
Quote:
It is a tactic that has yet to ever be attempted

The first rule of warfare is to never drop your guard against any possibility. America dropped her guard and got hit with Pearl Harbor and 9/11.
Likewise, terror squads could try to sneak ashore in America any time they please, it's already been done by the nazis in WW2!

WIKI- "On June 12, 1942, the U-boat U-202 landed Dasch's team with explosives and plans at East Hampton, Long Island, New York.Their mission was to destroy power plants at Niagara Falls and three Aluminum Company of America factories in Illinois, Tennessee and New York.
In 1944 there was another attempt at infiltration..Their mission objective was to gather intelligence on the Manhattan Project and attempt sabotage if possible. They sailed from Kiel on U-1230 and landed at Hancock Point, Maine on November 30, 1944"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Theater_(World_War_II)

The moral?- Keep your guard up..Smile
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/caineB1.jpg
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:09 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
What has to do anything with suitcase nukes?
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Well, this thread is about Israel v Muslims, so when the Islamists get their hands on suitcase nukes the ****'ll really hit the fan won't it?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:22 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Your "when" is laughable at best. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:46 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Romeo Fabulini wrote:

Well, this thread is about Israel v Muslims, so when the Islamists get their hands on suitcase nukes the ****'ll really hit the fan won't it?


Maybe in your fevered brain. This thread is about Israeli expansion, quite a complex issue when all's told. When you reduce it to "Israel v Muslims" you show your inability to grasp anything but the most simplistic of concepts.
cicerone imposter
 
  3  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 02:59 pm
@izzythepush,
He fails to grasp many things. Nukes are not easy to assembly in suitcase size because of the complexity of what is required to set off a nuclear device. Simple minds can only relate to stories they read in fictional news reports for their only source of "wisdom" about nukes.
Advocate
 
  1  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 03:03 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

He fails to grasp many things. Nukes are not easy to assembly in suitcase size because of the complexity of what is required to set off a nuclear device. Simple minds can only relate to stories they read in fictional news reports for their only source of "wisdom" about nukes.


What is your authority for that statement?
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 03:04 pm
@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
Maybe in your fevered brain.


Actually, he already admitted that Wink
Romeo Fabulini wrote:
I only support the minority far-right parties.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 03:08 pm
@Advocate,
Quote:
What is your authority for that statement?


I worked with nukes in the USAF for four years, and I was a team leader. I also found errors in the instruction manuals, and had them corrected.
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:11 pm
Anyway, let's not get too side-tracked with little suitcase nukes, sure they can hurt, but our enemies dream of getting their hands on PROPER big hoo-boy nuke bombs!
They don't even need a complicated ballistic missile to deliver it; they could simply load it onto a merchant ship or sub, then sail to within a few miles of a coastal city and deposit it on the seabed with a time fuse and skedaddle.
The blast, tsunami and radioactivity would mess up the city real bad-

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Baker-test.gif
http://youtu.be/fRyX_itiv0o


cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:15 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
How easy do you think it is to have a
Quote:
ballistic missile to deliver it; they could simply load it onto a merchant ship or sub,
?

Do you understand anything about our defensive systems?
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:20 pm
Cicerone Imposter asked:
Quote:
Do you understand anything about our defensive systems?

A little bit mate, I was a Big Shot at The Few Good Men military discussion/wargaming forum for a few years under my fighting name "Poor Old Spike"..Smile
PS- if anybody's interested in aircraft, I've got some picture threads going here-
http://www.mission4today.com/index.php?name=ForumsPro&file=viewforum&f=92

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/fgm-bannerB.png
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:21 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
You should see the **** he comes out with on the religious threads. On a thread about the nature of Jesus Christ he went on about what a big knife he has. He's a ******* idiot.
Romeo Fabulini
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:32 pm
@izzythepush,
There's nothing "evil" about weapons, whether they're knives or nukes.
For example when they came to arrest Jesus, one of his mates whipped out a sword and clobbered the high priest's flunky across the head with it, shouting-
"You little ************!" (John 18:10)
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 04:52 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
You're still a ******* idiot.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 05:03 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
Quote:
A little bit mate,


A little bit is an exaggeration, mate. Mr. Green
0 Replies
 
Romeo Fabulini
 
  -1  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 09:56 pm
Do I detect fear from some people in this forum who dare not face facts?
As early as 1938 Goring was ranting against America-
"I completely lack the bombers capable of round-trip flights to New York with a 5-ton bomb load. I would be extremely happy to possess such a bomber which would at last stuff the mouth of arrogance across the sea."-Hermann Goering 1938
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/Photos%20Two/Goering1943.jpg

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/ExIS/amerbomb.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/sub4/amerikabombr.jpg

And Hitler was developing an atom bomb.
Nazi study of the effects of an atomic blast on New York-
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/PoorOldSpike/sub3/Oct43LuftmapA-bomb.jpg

There's a paralell nowadays as the Muslim world rants against America, so let's hope she isn't caught with her pants down again like she was at Pearl Harbor and 9/11..Wink
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Mon 7 Oct, 2013 10:41 pm
@Romeo Fabulini,
The Germans were far from building a nuclear bomb. They didn't have the amount of uranium needed, and their hard water production was destroyed in Norway. Their hard water was dropped into the Atlantic Ocean.

The Germans failed to make the development of nuclear weapons a high priority, and their bigotry against Jewish scientists created a huge handicap in their development. Rather than a centralized system to develop a weapon, they had several competing groups.

Having a long-distance bomber was of no use when they didn't have the weapon. In late 1945, the allies were bombing Germany at will, and their defense was crumbling. Some even attempted to kill Hitler.

0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 09/21/2024 at 01:28:41