Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

Since I wish to reply to a post from 2009, it is not surprising contributor "Robert Gentel's" link no longer works.

THE HAGUE, 19 July 2024. The International Court of Justice has today given its Advisory Opinion in respect of the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem.

It is recalled that, on 30 December 2022, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted resolution A/RES/77/247 in which, referring to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, it requested the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on the following questions:

“(a) What are the legal consequences arising from the ongoing violation by Israel of theright of the Palestinian people to self-determination, from its prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, includingmeasures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status ofthe Holy City of Jerusalem, and from its adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures?
(b) How do the policies and practices of Israel referred to . . . above affect the legal status of the occupation, and what are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this status?”
In its Advisory Opinion, the Court responds to the questions posed by the General Assembly by concluding that:
 the State of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its unlawful presence in the OccupiedPalestinian Territory as rapidly as possible;

 the State of Israel is under an obligation to cease immediately all new settlement activities, and to evacuate all settlers from the Occupied Palestinian Territory;
 the State of Israel has the obligation to make reparation for the damage caused to all the natural or legal persons concerned in the Occupied Palestinian Territory;

I'm not going to waste my time detailing them all, (Israel's war crimes) only for a fascist to deny everything.

Lehi split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. It initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany. Believing that Nazi Germany was a lesser enemy of the Jews than Britain, Lehi twice attempted to form an alliance with the Nazis, proposing a Jewish state based on "nationalist and totalitarian principles, and linked to the German Reich by an alliance".

The "top secret" minutes of meetings between senior officials from the two countries in 1975 show that South Africa's defence minister, PW Botha, asked for the warheads and Shimon Peres, then Israel's defence minister and now its president, responded by offering them "in three sizes". The two men also signed a broad-ranging agreement governing military ties between the two countries that included a clause declaring that "the very existence of this agreement" was to remain secret.

In the 1970s, while the international campaign to end apartheid in South Africa was ramping up, then-Prime Minister Rabin deepened Israel’s alliance with the country’s racist white government, which began in the 1960s and included working together to build nuclear weapons. In 1975, they established a "Joint Secretariate for Political and Psychological Warfare,” including "propaganda and psychological warfare,” part of a $100 million South African propaganda campaign to rehabilitate the country’s image. According to a report from NBC News:

In 1976, South African Prime Minister John Vorster, who was imprisoned by the British during World War II for pro-Nazi sympathies and activities, was welcomed warmly in Israel. At a state dinner, Rabin praised Vorster for creating a “prosperous atmosphere of cooperation” between their two countries.

In 1941, Jews in Palestine were not yet aware of the “Final Solution,” but they did know Jews were suffering under Nazi rule. [Abraham] Stern [leader of the Stern Group] decided to try to convince the Germans to allow Jews to go to Palestine. He sent Naftali Lubinchik to Beirut for a meeting with a German Foreign Ministry representative. Lubinchik told the Germans the “Jewish problem” could be solved by sending the Jews to Palestine, where they would create a Jewish military force to help conquer the land from the British.
[...]

Source:
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/lo-x1e25-amei-x1e24-erut-israel

[...] In June 1940, Stern broke away from the Irgun Zeva’i Le’ummi (Etzel). The split was due to disagreement on three main issues:
(a) Stern’s demand that the military struggle against the British government be continued irrespective of the war against Nazi Germany;
(b) opposition to enlistment in the British army, which [Ze’ev] Jabotinsky [commander of the Irgun] supported; and
(c) willingness to collaborate, as a tactical measure, with anyone who supported the struggle against the British in Palestine. [...]

Source:
See previous link.