63
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 01:00 pm
@0bserver,
Quote:
Read my fisrt post. I explained exactly why this map is a complete lie.


Are you saying that Robert Gentel is a complete liar, Observer?
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 01:06 pm
@0bserver,
People like this.

Quote:
The youngest of six children, Kaufman was born in Leeds to Louis and Jane Kaufman. His parents were both Jewish and came from Poland before the First World War. He was educated at Leeds Grammar School, and graduated with a degree in philosophy, politics and economics from the University of Oxford (Queen's College). During his time there, he was Secretary of the University Labour Club. He was assistant general secretary of the Fabian Society from (1954–55), a lead writer on the Daily Mirror (1955–64) and a journalist on the New Statesman (1964–65). He was Parliamentary Press Liaison Officer for the Labour Party (1965–70) and eventually became a member of Prime Minister Harold Wilson's informal "kitchen cabinet".


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Kaufman

What you're doing is very snide, picking out one Tory MP, who has subsequently had the party whip withdrawn for his comments, to try to make a point about the entire legislature is extremely dishonest. You can find racists in every legislature.

Patrick Mercer's comments were off the record, a slip of the tongue. That doesn't excuse what he said, and I'm not going to stick up for a bloody Tory, but it's a far cry from Knesset member Arye Eldad.

Quote:
Frequent and rising Israeli settler attacks on Palestinians almost always go unpunished.

Indeed, often, Israeli soldiers stand by and watch as Israeli settlers go on the rampage. The situation is so bad that a boy like Yousef Ikhlayl, 17, can be killed and there is no investigation or accountability.

So when an Israeli settler got sentenced to prison for torturing and abusing a Palestinian child, it was quite an event, as Haaretz reported:


Prominent rabbis, public officials and a Knesset member, on Saturday, held a send off for a criminal about to enter prison after being convicted of abusing a Palestinian youth.

The event was held in the West Bank Shilo settlement in honor of Zvi Struck, who was convicted of abusing a Palestinian youth in July 2007, together with another man whose identity remains unknown. The two beat the youth up, bound him, fired their guns close to him, undressed him and threw him naked at the roadside. Three months earlier the two men had beaten up the same youth and killed a day-old kid.

The Jerusalem District Court sentenced Struck to 18th months in prison, which the Supreme Court extended after an appeal to 30 months.

According to Haaretz, “The send off was led by Bnei Akiva yeshivas head Rabbi Haim Drukman and Kiryat Arba Rabbi Dov Lior, Binyamin Council head Avi Ro’eh, his deputy Motti Yogev and MK [Knesset member] Arye Eldad.”


http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-officials-honor-settler-who-tortured-palestinian-child-leaving-him-naked

If the only way you can think of to discredit the BBC is to find some old racist Tory MP then you've lost the argument. Why don't you follow the link I gave, look at the independent panel judging the BBC's impartiality and see if you can find a problem with some of those?
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 01:08 pm
@0bserver,
You can't see the connection? This money will not benefit the Palestinian people, it will benefit the rich American involved. I doubt any profits will stay in Palestine.
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 01:48 pm
@0bserver,
0bserver wrote:

1) The first map is intentionally misleading, or in other words is just a lie. There was no "Palestinian land" prior to 1947. There was a British mandate over the whole region.

This isn’t a lie. In 1922 the British Mandate for Palestine delineated land under British control specifying it as Mandate Palestine, or simply Palestine, and it wasn’t divided into “Jewish land” or “Palestinian land”. It was regarded as a single entity.
Quote:
2) So the only land that can be called "Palestinian" is on the second map. It was Palestinian for several minutes - until they rejected the UN plan, and joined Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon to attack Israel with the purpose of destroying it. They don't deny this historical fact.

This assertion is based on your previous erroneous assertion making it erroneous as well. That the Palestinians and their allies rejected the UN plan is irrelevant to the fact that Palestine as delineated by the British Mandate for Palestine existed and continues to exist as a distinct geopolitical entity over which the Zionists and Palestinians are fighting.
Quote:
3) The 3rd map is a result of a war that the Arabs started and lost. Same thing happened in Europe when the Germans lost in WWI. Don't want to lose land - don't start wars with intention of eliminating the neighbor country

This is a self-serving approach to the conflict seeing as how the Zionists encroached on land inhabited by the Palestinian peoples.
If you want peace don’t arrogate other peoples lands and don’t repress them thereof.
Quote:
4) Another lie in map 3 is calling pre-1967 borders Palestinian. That was land occupied by Egypt in Gaza and by Jordan in the West Bank.

Again, that land is the geopolitical entity that the British Mandate for Palestine delineated as Palestine. The state of Israel is presently in control of that land.
Quote:
5) Map 4 is an intermediate stage of post Oslo agreements when most of the West bank was supposed to gradually be handed over to the Palestinians , as they start fighting their terror groups. Instead they only encourage the terrorists, and teach hatred to kids in elementary schools.

This in no way negates the fact that there is a land called Palestine, you’re false and erroneous assertions notwithstanding.
Quote:
So this poster is just misleading propaganda. I'm not even going into the whole historic argument about a Jewish state being there for thousands of years.

The maps aren’t propaganda. They accurately show Palestine.
Silly religious mythologies aside, a “Jewish state” has been there for about 65 years.
Quote:
Having said that, I still think Palestinians should have their own state, without any Israelis interfering with their lives. The problem is that it is posters like this that prevent any agreement because it is posters like this that mislead Palestinians into thinking that they are entitled to the whole land, and they shouldn't ever compromise. This sort of thinking keeps them stateless for 65 years now.

No. Maps like this merely show the reality of the situation in Palestine where imperial and super powers have allowed the ethnocentrically motivated interloping Zionists to arrogate Palestine and repress the Palestinian peoples therein in the name of the state for “the Jews.”
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:13 pm
@izzythepush,
"probably the case because you've swallowed so much pro Israeli stuff."

Funny, so you assume you have access to the ultimate Truth? Why don't we all be a bit more realistic?

All media is biased. I listen to pro Israeli voices and pro Palestinian ones, and I do the averaging. Yes, keeping in mind the Jewish influence on US media, and keeping in mind the Arab and Muslim influence on European media etc.

Of course criticism of Israel does not have to originate in antisemitism. But it can be. Here's from another UK media:

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/its-official-thanks-to-stephen-hawkings-israel-boycott-antisemitism-is-no-more-8621112.html
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:17 pm
@izzythepush,
"a slip of the tongue"?? How does it make it any better? So you're saying it's fine to think this way, just make sure you're careful not to say it?

0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:19 pm
@izzythepush,
They will have a nice city. You are willing to take that away from them just to make a point?
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:21 pm
@0bserver,
0bserver wrote:
Yes, keeping in mind the Jewish influence on US media, and keeping in mind the Arab and Muslim influence on European media etc.
Interestingly you write "Jewish influence" - as if it was a religious influence, and don't mention Israel.

How does the Arab and Muslim influence work in Europe? I mean, I lve here now 64 years, have studied journalism and history at universities, are rather well educated about ownerships and party influences on our media. There certainly are Muslim journalists as there are Muslim owners. And Arabs might by owners or shareholders of some media as well. But to get from such a general "influence on European media" ... Well, if you think so.

Regarding your link: you do know what an 'opinion' or what a 'comment' is, don't you? Israeli papers have such columns as well.
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:34 pm
@InfraBlue,
"In 1922 the British Mandate for Palestine delineated land under British control specifying it as Mandate Palestine, or simply Palestine, and it wasn’t divided into “Jewish land” or “Palestinian land”. It was regarded as a single entity."

A single entity that was a British Mandate - not the land of the Palestinian people. In the ancient times the region around Gaza was Philistinian, so what? The map should have colored the mandate differently from the real Palestinian proposed in the UN plan. If you color it the same way as the land after UN partition plan, you are intentionally misleading people into thinking that that land belonged to Palestinians - it did not, and you know it. Same goes for your second point.

"If you want peace don’t arrogate other peoples lands and don’t repress them thereof."

1) If you want people not to arrogate other peoples lands - don't murder millions of them in gas chambers. 2)And this land was Jewish for millenia. And it was never Palestinian. It was under Jewish rule, Roman rule, Turkish, British - any thing but Palestinian. And just like most of the Jews, most of the Arabs immigrated into that land in the 20th century from Egypt, Iraq etc.

I don't know where you're from, but all of today's maps are based on some people arrogating other peoples lands.

"Again, that land is the geopolitical entity that the British Mandate for Palestine delineated as Palestine. The state of Israel is presently in control of that land."

I can't see how this has anything to do with the fact that Egypt was in control of Gaza, and Jordan in control of the west bank. If you don't paint them the same color as Egypt and Jordan - you're lying.

"This in no way negates the fact that there is a land called Palestine, you’re false and erroneous assertions notwithstanding."

This land is also call Israel, Judah, Samaria.. and I'm sure in Chinese it's called something else. I don't care what some cultures call some regions. There is a country called UK, Egypt, Jordan and Israel. There could have been a country called Palestine, if they didn't reject the UN plan. I hope now they are wise enough not to miss another opportunity.

" Maps like this merely show the reality of the situation"

No. It shows some extreme ideology view that wants to keep fighting forever and never let the kids have a normal future. To be fair, so is the settelers' view of the greater Israel . Too bad some people don't care enough about their children to stop fighting for pointless ideologies.
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:40 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Well it is not Israeli influence because there aren't many Israeli journalists in the US. But there are many Jewish ones. And I don't mean religion - I mean ethnicity.

As for Arab or Muslim influence in Europe, that's simple: there's a rapidly growing Arab and Muslim population in Europe, and naturally it affects the public opinion and therefore the media. I have nothing against that in principle - I just notice a fact. And Europe is basically an energy hostage of the Muslim world. I wonder how the European media changes as Israelis keep finding more natural gas and oil.
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:49 pm
@0bserver,
0bserver wrote:

Well it is not Israeli influence because there aren't many Israeli journalists in the US. But there are many Jewish ones. And I don't mean religion - I mean ethnicity.

As for Arab or Muslim influence in Europe, that's simple: there's a rapidly growing Arab and Muslim population in Europe, and naturally it affects the public opinion and therefore the media. I have nothing against that in principle - I just notice a fact. And Europe is basically an energy hostage of the Muslim world. I wonder how the European media changes as Israelis keep finding more natural gas and oil.

So, in your opinion, the Jewish influence in the USA is done by Jewish journalist while the Arab and Muslim influence in Europe comes from the population.

And you mean that the European media will change their opinion about Israel when Israel will become a main gas and oil exporter for Europe?
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 02:50 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
"Regarding your link: you do know what an 'opinion' or what a 'comment' is, don't you? "

Yes I do. The title of the article is sarcastic. When you have a spare minute give it a quick read - it may give you a different perspective on "accusing anti-Israeli critics of antisemitism"
0 Replies
 
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 03:00 pm
@JTT,
The map is a complete lie. The person posting it may be just naive
0 Replies
 
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 03:12 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
"So, in your opinion, the Jewish influence in the USA is done by Jewish journalist while the Arab and Muslim influence in Europe comes from the population."

Not only. I think there are two effects: the local population and also the external politics. And it just happens that US has a a larger Jewish population than Europe (you know why, right?) , and Europe has a larger Arab population than the US (I'm not sure why, actually). And in addition, Europe has many interests with the Arab world and in Iran. While the US has interests with Israel. You don't think that all this combined affects the politics, the public opinion and the media?

"And you mean that the European media will change their opinion about Israel when Israel will become a main gas and oil exporter for Europe? "

I don't want to make any speculations. Lets wait and see. I trust the UK media to reflect the public opinion in UK. The question is what will happen to the public opinion.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 03:18 pm
@0bserver,
0bserver wrote:

They will have a nice city. You are willing to take that away from them just to make a point?


It won't be me who takes it away from them.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 03:20 pm
@0bserver,
I never said it was fine, the guy's a Tory **** through and through, but it's not in the same league as attending a going away party for a child abductor.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 03:26 pm
@0bserver,
The difference is that Western governments already bend over backwards to help Israel. Despite everything Israel still has favoured nation status with the EU. Other unsavoury countries like Iran and Burma are treated quite differently. It was the same with apartheid South Africa, the boycott is the best way for concerned citizens to express disapproval with an apartheid regime, and support for an occupied people.
InfraBlue
 
  0  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 04:19 pm
@0bserver,
observer wrote:
A single entity that was a British Mandate - not the land of the Palestinian people.

And this has absolutely no bearing on the fact that there is a land called Palestine whose inhabitants are called Palestinians within which the Zionists are repressing.
Quote:
In the ancient times the region around Gaza was Philistinian, so what?

You tell me, you’re the one bringing up this red herring.
Quote:
The map should have colored the mandate differently from the real Palestinian proposed in the UN plan. If you color it the same way as the land after UN partition plan, you are intentionally misleading people into thinking that that land belonged to Palestinians - it did not, and you know it. Same goes for your second point.

You’re making the assumption that the maps intentionally mislead people into thinking that the land belongs to Palestinians.
The maps simply show the areas of Zionist control in Palestine which is all of it.

Quote:
1) If you want people not to arrogate other peoples lands - don't murder millions of them in gas chambers.

The Palestinians didn’t murder millions of arrogators in gas chambers.
Quote:
2)And this land was Jewish for millenia.

It was other things for even more millenia. This red herring does not negate the fact that the Zionists arrogated Palestine and are repressing the Palestinian peoples therein.
Quote:
And it was never Palestinian. It was under Jewish rule, Roman rule, Turkish, British - any thing but Palestinian.

This as well does not negate the fact that the Zionists arrogated Palestine and are repressing the Palestinian peoples therein.
Quote:
And just like most of the Jews, most of the Arabs immigrated into that land in the 20th century from Egypt, Iraq etc.

The Arabs that immigrated to Palestine were from that general area, mostly Syria and Transjordan, the same basic people. The Zionists were mostly from Central and Eastern Europe. The later Zionists were from Iraq, Iran and other parts of the Middle East and North Africa. Even later Zionist arrivals came, and continue to come mostly from Russia.

Quote:
I don't know where you're from, but all of today's maps are based on some people arrogating other peoples lands.

A tu quoque argument does not negate the fact that the Zionists are repressing the Palestinian peoples after having arrogated Palestine. Much less does it justify the former’s repression of the latter. This is the crux of the conflict between the two that has yet to be resolved.

Quote:
InfraBlue wrote:
Again, that land is the geopolitical entity that the British Mandate for Palestine delineated as Palestine. The state of Israel is presently in control of that land."


I can't see how this has anything to do with the fact that Egypt was in control of Gaza, and Jordan in control of the west bank. If you don't paint them the same color as Egypt and Jordan - you're lying.

The point is that regardless of the fact that Egypt was in control of Gaza and Jordan of the West Bank after the Nabka, Palestine as delineated by the British Mandate for Palestine did exist and continues to exist. It is the land over which the Zionists and Palestinians are fighting and whose conflict has yet to be resolved.

Again, this in no way negates the fact that there is a land called Palestine, you’re false and erroneous red herrings notwithstanding.

Quote:
This land is also call Israel, Judah, Samaria.. and I'm sure in Chinese it's called something else. I don't care what some cultures call some regions. There is a country called UK, Egypt, Jordan and Israel.

Regardless of what you chose to call the land—you can call it Observrael—this is the land that the Zionists arrogated and repress the Palestinians therein.
Quote:
InfraBlue wrote:
Maps like this merely show the reality of the situation"


No. It shows some extreme ideology view that wants to keep fighting forever and never let the kids have a normal future. To be fair, so is the settelers' view of the greater Israel . Too bad some people don't care enough about their children to stop fighting for pointless ideologies.

Showing the reality for what it is, the land—Observrael--that the Zionists control and within which they are discriminating against and repressing the Palestinian people, is not some extreme ideology that wants to keep fighting forever and never let "the kids have a normal future.” That is merely your extremist view of the maps.
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 04:22 pm
@izzythepush,
Israel doesn't hang gay people on city squares like Iran etc.
I will repeat: Israel gives equal rights to all its citizens. The Palestinian authority is not part of Israel and its people are not Israeli citizens . It's an entity that is currently in military conflict with Israel - that's why there is a presence of the Israeli army. It's true that some religious Jewish extremists take advantage of this conflict and settle on that west bank territory, forcing the army to protect them and by doing that abuse Palestinians.

Again, the conflict is bad, occupation is bad. But it has nothing to do with Apartheid. Why can't you see that?

By your logic the US is an Apartheid because it occupies Iraq and Afghanistan. And so does the UK and Canada etc.

BTW, Should we start boycotting the UK for sending aircraft carriers to the coast of Spain right now? What business the UK has occupying Gibraltar? Occupying the Falkland islands on the other side of the planet (!). And while visiting Cyprus, I learned that parts of Cyprus are actually under UK rule. Why?
0bserver
 
  2  
Mon 12 Aug, 2013 04:27 pm
@InfraBlue,
This is becoming a lawyer-like debate over definitions. My point is "don't be right, be wise". Everyone sees themselves as the "right" side. That never leads anywhere.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 06:20:52