63
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 07:20 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I perceive no contradiction.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 07:27 am
@oralloy,
And why can't you extrapolate your situation to that elsewhere?

(I don't blame the Francs that they invaded us - after all, my ancestors, Saxons, invaded the country of the Bructeri before as well. And I still live just miles away from where they originally settled, too.)
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 07:44 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
And why can't you extrapolate your situation to that elsewhere?

Do you mean "use the fact that the US used superior power to seize land from Native Americans, to justify Israel using superior power to seize land from Palestinians"?

If that is what you meant, I suppose I could use that argument.

I much prefer though to point that Israel repeatedly and endlessly offered a two-state solution to the Palestinians, only to be rebuffed with violence and deceit every single time, and that Israel is only on their present course because the Palestinians have rejected all peace.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 09:49 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
The Palestinians will not give up their Right of Return. The Two State Solution is not a fair peace precisely because it aims to deny the Palestinians their right.

I remind you that the Israeli Jews are the indigenous people here. Whatever right of return the Palestinians might have, the Israeli Jews have a billion times more.

The only fair outcome was to divide the land between both claimants. That was what the two-state solution attempted to do.

The originating Zionists were Europeans. The latter Zionists were Mesopotamians, Persians, and North Africans.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 10:48 am
@InfraBlue,
The "only fair outcome" in this situation is an oxymoron.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:22 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
The originating Zionists were Europeans. The latter Zionists were Mesopotamians, Persians, and North Africans.

All direct descendants of the original Iron Age Israelites.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:25 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
The "only fair outcome" in this situation is an oxymoron.

Do you have an alternative other than land for peace?
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:27 am
@oralloy,
You are blind: the Israelis are building settlements on Palestinian lands.
The UN has determined that to be illegal by international laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:35 am
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
You are blind: the Israelis are building settlements on Palestinian lands.

Now you are just being silly. It was only a few hours ago that I made it clear in this very thread that I was fully aware of the settlements.

I also note that you don't seem to have any alternative to land for peace. I guess "only fair outcome" wasn't such an oxymoron after all.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:57 am
@oralloy,
Land for peace is an oxymoron when the israelis continue to build settlements on Palestinian lands. You don't understand human behavior or logic.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 11:59 am
@oralloy,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 01:21 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
The originating Zionists were Europeans. The latter Zionists were Mesopotamians, Persians, and North Africans.

All direct descendants of the original Iron Age Israelites.

According to the latest genealogical research, the European Zionists are comprised mostly of Southern European gene pools. The Mizrahim are comprised of gene pools originating in the general areas of West Asia from where they originate.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 01:29 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:
The "only fair outcome" in this situation is an oxymoron.

Do you have an alternative other than land for peace?

Yeah, the Right of Return for peace.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 01:59 pm
@InfraBlue,
Good answer. I don't think oralloy knows what that means.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
I don't think oralloy knows what that means.

It means the Palestinians refuse to make peace with Israel, thereby giving Israel the moral right to take what they want through military force.
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:30 pm
@oralloy,
No, it does not.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:44 pm
@MontereyJack,
oralloy doesn't understand international law.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:47 pm
@oralloy,
Israel was admitted to the UN as a PEACE LOVING COUNTRY.
The US military remains strong, but we do not use it to take over our neighboring countries.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:51 pm
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
No, it does not.

Wrong. When you make repeated and endless efforts to reach a fair peace, and your adversary only ever responds with violence and deceit, you then have the right to use force to end your adversary's aggression against you.
cicerone imposter
 
  6  
Thu 7 Jul, 2016 02:54 pm
@oralloy,
You can't make fair peace when they continue to expand their settlements on Palestinian lands. It's already been determined by international law to be illegal.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.16 seconds on 11/17/2024 at 10:16:26