63
   

Can you look at this map and say Israel does not systemically appropriate land?

 
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:03 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
This study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14 million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world. The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have been the target of U.S. intervention.

The overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30 million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

Fiction.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:05 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Frank Apisa wrote:
But of course, "who the rightful owners are" is not an easy thing to determine...and is currently a huge bone of contention between many disparate parties. My concern is not whether or not you are of that opinion, Oralloy...but how you reasonably arrive at it.

It is easy enough to determine. The Jews are the indigenous population of the West Bank area. As such, they are the rightful owners.

The Palestinians are indigenous to a neighboring area. As such, it would be reasonable to divide the land in a negotiated two-state solution. But enough is enough; Israel has offered peace more than enough times.


Frank Apisa wrote:
Whether or not the Jews were treated as "third-class citizens at best" whatever that is supposed to mean) is incidental. The area WAS relatively peaceful between the parties.

You are not "disputing" that...you are simply introducing a red herring...a gratuitous red herring, at that.

I do not find that to be an acceptable form of peace, more an Orwellian mockery of what peace should be.

The Jews may have been unable to resist their abusive treatment, and the Muslims may have been content to let Jews live under a system where the Muslims were allowed to steal their homeland and treat them as third-class citizens, but such a society was only a nice place to be if you were a Muslim.


Frank Apisa wrote:
Fact is, the two occasions where Jews were treated relatively kindly by non-Jew neighbors both occurred with Muslims being the neighbors. One was the situation with Jews and Muslims in that area living in relative peace and fraternity for thousands of years...and the other being in Muslim occupied southern Spain for almost a thousand years.

I'm sure it was preferable to being massacred by anti-Semitic Xians. But that doesn't mean it was an acceptable situation.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:06 pm
@carloslebaron,
carloslebaron wrote:
With today's technology and smart phones giving you facts from every side of an aspect, new generations of the Jewish population are finding out that their "holocaust" (gas chambers, burning people alive, and similar) wasn't true.

Nonsense.


carloslebaron wrote:
Forget the thousands of years of history, because if the native people of Hawaii start to claim their islands in base of thousands of years of history, then the US will be in trouble.

That's the US' problem. Those sorts of things tend to happen when you steal people's land.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:06 pm
@korkamann,
korkamann wrote:
If Americans were to really try and understand Israel and the middle east many will see that Israel's enemies view America as their enemy and the US will for the foreseeable future be a target while Israel continues to steal Palestinian land and corrupt our congress.

Translation: If people were to accept anti-Semitic propaganda as true, they would think all sorts of nonsense.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:06 pm
@korkamann,
korkamann wrote:
"Character?" What character? Don't you mean buffoon?

Your silly name-calling does not change that you cannot point out a single fact that I am wrong about.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:11 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

When the state split into two, the northern one was Israel and was to turn into Samaria . The southern one was Judea and was more fundamentalist . They survived the Babylon invasion a little longer than Israel . When the Jews returned from exile, they settled in the south whilst the north kept the foreigners that had been forced to move in . Judea comes from Judah who was the name of one of the sons of Jacob and thus founder of one of the 12 tribes of Israel . Judah gives us Jude who was a brother of Jesus , which in turn gave us Jude in some languages and Jew in English .

When the decision to name the new Jewish state was made, it was decided to call it Israel after the new name given to Jacob when he was told he will found a nation .

The word Israelites is now obvious in meaning . Hebrew came from the first know text of the tribe, ibri, which scholars believe was the early Israelites .

Quote:
You don't know the difference between Israel and a Jew.
Are you sure ?

And so Zionism and the state of Israel are based on religious mythology.
Builder
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:12 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
The Palestinians are NOT a race of people distinct by language, religion, culture or any other measure . They are the same people as in Jordan and Lebanon .


If you want to get pedantic about the history of these people, we'll settle for apartheid, shall we? Jews and Palestinians are not from any particular race, but from the same origins with both of their lineage/s coming from Ibrahim, alayhi sallam (Abraham). The Jews come from the second son Issak, alayhi sallam (Isaac) and the Arabs come from the first born son Ismael, alayhi sallam (Ishmael). They are both Semitic in origin.
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:13 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I could have called this sociopathic personality

Lying about me won't change the fact that I was telling the truth.


Walter Hinteler wrote:
as having a personality disorder etc

Instead of lying about me, you could instead just try to accept reality.

Of course, if you think I've made a mistake with any of my facts, you could also point out the alleged error.

But you'd have to actually spot a mistake first of course. And I'd likely then counter with proof that I was correct. But still better than simply lying about me just because you dislike hearing about reality.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:14 pm
@korkamann,
korkamann wrote:
In order to raise money for the Contras Oliver North and some others sold drugs to the inner city.

Nonsense.


korkamann wrote:
Reagan, before his election, made a deal with the Iranians to continue holding the 52 American hostages until after he had won the election.

Nonsense.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:17 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Technically speaking, Napalm-B isn't Napalm, so you're correct.

I suspect he meant that the use of Napalm-B was limited.

I am less familiar with Vietnam than I am the bombing of Japan in 1945, so I am not in a position to either agree or disagree.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  0  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:20 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
And so Zionism and the state of Israel are based on religious mythology.

Your dislike of historical facts does not make them religious mythology.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:23 pm
@Builder,
Builder wrote:
If you want to get pedantic about the history of these people, we'll settle for apartheid, shall we?

Such anti-Semitic terminology isn't helpful.


Builder wrote:
They are both Semitic in origin.

The Palestinians were given more than enough opportunities to have 1967 borders. It's their own fault they chose to attack the people who were offering them peace.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:37 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:

I am waiting for people to realise that the terrorists of 9/11 and all the Islamist attacks we experienced before and since have the greatest support in Palestine, another Muslim people .
Superlatives aside, so they have support in Palestine, so what? The Zionists have support in the US and other places for their slaughter of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
Ionus wrote:
They have as a basic clause in their charter to eliminate Israel .
Necessarily discriminatory and oppressive regimes should be eliminated.
Ionius wrote:
What would they be capable of if they had their own country ?
They'd be capable of living self-determinedly.
Ionus wrote:
Would the USA have to cruise bomb their terrorists and training camps ?
If they had any that were detrimental to the US' ends, then of course.
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:41 pm
@Ionus,
Ionus wrote:
Israel is there and aint goin' nowheres .

Yeah, and South Africa is right where it has always been, too.

Regimes, however, are transitory entities and the Israeli one has its days numbered as well.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:45 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

InfraBlue wrote:
And so Zionism and the state of Israel are based on religious mythology.

Your dislike of historical facts does not make them religious mythology.

Your religious mythologies and outright flights of fancy aren't historical facts, however.
oralloy
 
  -2  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:49 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
Regimes, however, are transitory entities and the Israeli one has its days numbered as well.

Islam will die before Israel does.
oralloy
 
  -1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 04:49 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:
Your religious mythologies and outright flights of fancy aren't historical facts, however.

I've not posted any religious mythologies or outright flights of fancy. All I've done is post science and history.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 05:16 pm
Finally Oralboy challenges Carlos; Holocaust denial. Rather a half hearted challenge though, just one word, "Nonsense." One could almost describe it as noncommittal, yet he save all his venom and vitriol for those who call for the Palestinian's human rights to be respected.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 08:10 pm
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Jews and non-Jews got along relatively peacefully for thousands of years before the conception and creation of the state of Israel. From that point on...the problems began.
If the Jews begin with Abraham, then there are no end of wars . The Bablonians, the Egyptians, the Midianites, the Sea Peoples, the Greeks, the Jewish revolt against the Romans that scattered them and has its lasting legacy today in the setting up of Israel . There have been Christian and Islamic massacres of Jews for 2,000 and 1,300 years at least . I find your post highly exaggerated .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Wed 1 Apr, 2015 08:15 pm
@Olivier5,
Quote:
If so many Americans rejoice when Arabs get bombed, why can't many Arabs rejoice when Americans get bombed?
Cause and effect . USAins were sickoned by beheadings, bombings, hatred of women, traumatising children, burning men alive, etc...I can permit them a little celebration if they strike at this evil . You dont think the two sides are the same do you, even allowing for your French anti-american stance .

Quote:
If Israel can oppose a Palestinian state, why can't Hamas oppose a Jewish state?
If there is one Israeli settler terrorist attack on civilians then your lot start a hue and cry but everyday Palestinians attack Israeli civilians and thats fine by your morals .
 

Related Topics

Eye On Israel/Palestine - Discussion by IronLionZion
"Progressives(TM)" and Israel - Discussion by gungasnake
Israel's Reality - Discussion by Miller
Israel's Shame - Discussion by BigEgo
Abbas Embraces the Islamists - Discussion by Advocate
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 11/20/2024 at 06:30:33