@McTag,
McTag wrote:The state of Israel has taken property, lands, and water rights from the Palestinians and is operating an economic blockade on Gaza.
That's the background to this conflict.
Not exactly.
For Israel to have taken that from the Palestinians, the Palestinians would have had to have possessed it to begin with.
More to the point, Israel has offered to let the Palestinians have all of that in exchange for peace. The only reason it doesn't happen is because the Palestinians always refuse to make peace.
The economic blockade is not the cause of the attacks. Rather, the attacks are the cause of the economic blockade.
The economic blockade was loosened a couple years ago. However, Israel is now likely to tighten it back up again.
McTag wrote:As the arabs and muslims to the north and east mobilise and mechanise and organise, if I was an Israeli citizen I'd be worried that the power balance is shifting, and nuclear shells may be of little use in the conflict which could ensue.
It is unlikely that any Arab force will be a threat to Israel.
If any Arab force were actually potent enough to threaten Israel, atomic shells would be quite useful against it.
McTag wrote:At the moment what Israel is doing is laying the grounds for a pan-arab uprising.
That's unlikely. But such an uprising can be eradicated if it becomes bothersome.