@Brandon9000,
brandon wrote :
Quote: An attack using weapons is most certainly a military attack. If you like, I can instead call it a physically violent attack. It is universally recognized that people have the right to retaliate for a physically violent attack on their home.
- imo one can call the 9/11 attack an attack by terrorists or rogue elements - neither of which i condone !!!
- if someone invades my home and dies in the process , i doubt any court would sanction me to invade homes in which the invader never resided , destroy the homes and kill the inhabitants .
- what do afghanis (includung women and children) living in far away villages - who have not even heard of the U.S. - have to do with the 9/11 terrorists ?
- why has NO attempt been made to go after the financiers and supporters of these terrorist groups ?
these individuals and groups are well known , are they not (i am sure you have read what U.S. governement spokespeople have said ) ?
- what specifically might be the difficulties to go after the financiers of the terrorist groups ?
i am reasonable sure these financiers do not live in afghanistan .
- i do not post here to approve of what the 9/11 attackers did . i hope i have made that abundantly clear already - but want to restate it .
- don't hesitate to post your corrections .
hbg