24
   

GET OUT OF AFGHANISTAN

 
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 09:30 am
@Advocate,
the u.s. military became involved in afghanistan by a resolution of the U.S. congress - there has ben no declaration of war :
Quote:
2001 war in Afghanistan, also known as Operation Enduring Freedom


the word "enduring" is described as :

Quote:
1. Lasting; continuing; durable: a novel of enduring interest.
2. Long-suffering; patient.


"long suffering" ( 7 long years and no end in sight ) seems to describe the situation in afghanistan best .
hbg
0 Replies
 
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 09:33 am
@Advocate,
advocate wrote :

Quote:
We are increasingly gaining the hatred of the Afghans, who will never act like, say, the Germans once we won the war.


when the western nations support a corrupt government in kabul , is it any wonder that the afghanis are hating those that prop up a corrupt government ?
hbg
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 09:36 am
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

Brandon wrote:
We should try to defeat the people we're at war with. That is normally the goal in war. It cannot help us for everyone to know that if an enemy makes it tough for us, we'll always skulk out.

The enemy certainly made it tough for us in Iraq, but we persevered, and now we're even going to draw-down our troops there. What exactly have we won there, though? The suicide bombings have been reduced, but not eliminated. We've bought off the Sunni and Shiite factions that are against our presence there. Iran stands to make significant political ties with the Shiite dominated government in Iraq. We've about faced and agreed to a timetable for leaving. Is that something along the lines of the defeat of, and victory over our enemies we're to expect in Afghanistan? Our ruinous trillion dollar wars amount to those kinds of victories?

What's your point, that we have no right to retaliate when attacked on our own soil, that when a war proves difficult, that's the signal to give up?
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 09:38 am
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

You appear to me to have the mindset that European style warfare is the norm. Defeat the opposing army and victory is conceded. Other peoples don't see it like that. Generational wars are for the long haul. In Afghanistan, they should have planned a strategy for going in and getting bin Laden, then getting out. Instead, they moved in and squatted. That changed it from a get even for 911 operation into nation building in a nation that does not want us. In short, we are persevering in a war without a cause. Time to get out.

Having thousands of our civilians deliberately murdered on our own soil is a "war without cause???"
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 09:39 am
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

We forget that the Talaban are Afghans, and that they didn't attack us. Admittedly, they ran the government on 9/11, and they harbored al-Qaida, but they did not engineer the attack on us.

Accordingly, it is now time for us to go away. We are increasingly gaining the hatred of the Afghans, who will never act like, say, the Germans once we won the war.

It will be time to get out when we prevail. Any nation which runs away when a war is difficult has little further role to play in history.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 10:35 am
Brandon wrote:
What's your point, that we have no right to retaliate when attacked on our own soil, that when a war proves difficult, that's the signal to give up?

My question is: are our trillion dollar wars of retaliation worth what we're getting out of them?
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 01:18 pm
Having thousands of our civilians deliberately murdered on our own soil is a "war without cause???" - Brandon

They took the Taliban out of power. Then they let Bin aden slip away. The actions they are now fighting have little or nothing to do with 911 anymore. It is nation building in a nation that does not want our presence.
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 02:23 pm
We should think of the fate of the Roman Empire. It wasted its assets by going on costly ventures far afield.
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 02:33 pm
@Advocate,



The fate of the Roman Empire got me thinking about change.

Obama will bring us the following changes:

A Decline in Morals and Values
A Decline in Public Health
Increased Political Corruption
Increased Unemployment
Increased Inflation
Increased Urban decay
A Decline in Technology
A decline in Military Spending

Obama's Changes Will Result In the Fall of the United States.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 06:15 pm
@H2O MAN,
um .. I think it's fair to say that the US has already been "falling" (in terms of many of the items on your list). For quite some time now.
So you're going to blame Obama for all the "declines" that are already happening, are you?





But let's get back to discussing Afghanistan, though ...
hamburger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 06:24 pm
@msolga,
as msolga said : "let's get back to discussing afghanistan , though ... "

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/world/asia/09afghan.html?_r=1

from the above report :

Quote:
October 9, 2008
U.S. Study Is Said to Warn of Crisis in Afghanistan
By MARK MAZZETTI and ERIC SCHMITT
WASHINGTON " A draft report by American intelligence agencies concludes that Afghanistan is in a “downward spiral” and casts serious doubt on the ability of the Afghan government to stem the rise in the Taliban’s influence there, according to American officials familiar with the document.

The classified report finds that the breakdown in central authority in Afghanistan has been accelerated by rampant corruption within the government of President Hamid Karzai and by an increase in violence by militants who have launched increasingly sophisticated attacks from havens in Pakistan.

The report, a nearly completed version of a National Intelligence Estimate, is set to be finished after the November elections and will be the most comprehensive American assessment in years on the situation in Afghanistan. Its conclusions represent a harsh verdict on decision-making in the Bush administration, which in the months after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks made Afghanistan the central focus of a global campaign against terrorism.


adding anything to that report would just be a repitition of what has been said before over-over-again .
the truth doesn't always sound encouraging .
hbg
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 07:05 pm
@hamburger,
Quote:
...the truth doesn't always sound encouraging .


No, sadly it really doesn't, does it hamburger?

I am by no means an "expert" on Afghanistan, though I do try to keep track of developments through various news outlets ...
.. but I do wonder about the quality of the lives of women & girls there now. (Not too much reporting on that lately.) I've come across a number accounts, via literature & media reports, suggesting that the biggest improvement in the opportunities open to women was during the Russian occupation & that most gains were lost after the Russians withdrew. I also recall, in the early days of US intervention in Afghanistan, that the desperate plight of women & girls received wide sympathetic publicity. The presumption being that their lives would be directly improved as a result of US & allied efforts. Can anyone enlighten me on how things stand for them now?
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 07:35 pm
@msolga,
msolga wrote:

So you're going to blame Obama for all the "declines" that are already happening, are you?



PEBO needs to accept some responsibility for the current situation... he was a state senator.
As president, Obama will finish what others before him have started - count on it.





Enough about PEBO... let's get back to discussing Afghanistan.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 07:44 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
[... let's get back to discussing Afghanistan./quote]

Good idea!
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 08:14 pm
@msolga,
msolga wrote:



Good idea!


Thanks!
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 08:32 pm
@H2O MAN,
Any time! Wink
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 10:59 pm
@H2O MAN,
Hey, we got all those negative things already from -- guess who.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 11:55 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

Brandon wrote:
What's your point, that we have no right to retaliate when attacked on our own soil, that when a war proves difficult, that's the signal to give up?

My question is: are our trillion dollar wars of retaliation worth what we're getting out of them?

1. Compared to letting someone come to our homes and murder thousands, and not retaliate, absolutely, and almost every nation in history with the capability has taken that position.
2. The people we're opposing are very bad people who shouldn't be allowed to take over the country again.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 11:57 pm
@edgarblythe,
edgarblythe wrote:

Having thousands of our civilians deliberately murdered on our own soil is a "war without cause???" - Brandon

They took the Taliban out of power. Then they let Bin aden slip away. The actions they are now fighting have little or nothing to do with 911 anymore. It is nation building in a nation that does not want our presence.

It has plenty to do with 9/11. They're fighting the very group that gave our attacker shelter and support. Not even believing in fighting people who come to your home and murder your brothers and sisters is really pretty low.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Tue 30 Dec, 2008 11:58 pm
@Advocate,
Advocate wrote:

We should think of the fate of the Roman Empire. It wasted its assets by going on costly ventures far afield.

How many times do I have to remind you that we were attacked in our home? Are you having some kind of memory problem?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.85 seconds on 11/22/2024 at 10:05:00