@DrewDad,
of course not, though I have argued that the sex offender registries are offensive. What pisses me off is that we go nuts over small risks to our kids but major risks like not providing good schools and daycare and supporting the families in which the kids are raised we can't manage to address. This to me is like giving kids a wad of cash to spend to ease our guilt over not being home to see them all week, for not knowing anything about their lives. We go nuts over sex offenders because it makes us feel better about ourselves , not because there is a serious risk that needs our attention. We overcompensate for our lack of caring for our kids by getting going ape **** about protecting our kids from assault.
The majority of our kids are sexually assaulted by family members, friends of the family, and people the parents have entrusted their kids to. It is very rare for the assault to come from a stranger. You would never know that by how people act about protecting their kids from assault.
while I understand that the post office has liability to worry about thus might need to take action that otherwise does not make sense in order to protect themselves from being rung up in the courts, this event is more of the American insanity re sex.