@JPB,
Not at all
How can you contend that Obama is not a product of the Chicago Democratic Machine? Do you mean to suggest that someone can rise to the political level Obama rose to in Chicago and Illinois without being a favored son of the Machine?
This doesn't necessarily mean that he shares each and every flaw with the worst the Machine has produced, but it is naive to suggest he was able to rise in Illinois politics without the favor of the Machine, and ignorant to suggest he did so in opposition to the Machine.
I just saw a clip of an interview between Obama and Jeff Berkowitz. The endorsement was anything but "luke-warm."
The precise quote was
Quote:"I know he's talked to the governor, and there are a whole range of names, many of which have surfaced, and I think he has a fondness for a lot of them."
That's not "I believe," "I think," "I understand," "I've been informed" it's "I know."
If you discern something less than definite in the statement, so be it.
The facts are as I have stated them.
As I have repeatedly stated, these facts prove nothing as respects any untoward involvement by Obama in this scandal. They do, however, justify the media's continued interest in and pursuit of the story.
One of the reason that human beings have been so successful a species is their ability for pattern recognition.
Obama never heard Wright's racist, anti-american screeds, he had no reason to know that Bill Ayers was a terrorist, he didn't know Rezko was a crook, and he had no idea that Blegojevich was corrupt.