The goal of the U Constitution is really for 1 man 1 vote. Winner take all, disenfranchises certain states wealthy in population. You and a few others seem to absolutely want to do away with the nations frame as it was conceived.
We are a Democratic Republic, Monterey was 100% right on that. THOSE who can legally vote----choose their representatives (like electors) who then carry out their representative duties>
Thats as far as it goes. How the electors are allowed to practice their duty has always been an assignment NOT SPOKEN OF in the US CONSTITUTION. So doing away with "Winner take all" in the presidential election i but one way to restore equality of the franchise.
Noone can argue with that.
The only reason Trump won was because California voters were disenfranchised by population maxima and three key states were among the 48 winner take all states (only Maine, Nebraska, and DC use a proportional apportionment).
Id like to hear the argument that supports "W-T-A"