60
   

California Voters Approve Gay-Marriage Ban

 
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Mon 17 Feb, 2014 05:19 pm
AUTHOR ANNE RICE UNLOADS ON ANTI-GAY FACEBOOK COMMENTERS WHO USE RELIGION TO BASH GAYS
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/t1/1005627_707040389325417_397822663_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Mon 17 Feb, 2014 05:20 pm
bump
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Mon 17 Feb, 2014 05:20 pm
Bump de bump de bump Smile
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 11:34 am
US evangelists blamed for Uganda’s new anti-gay law
See more at:
http://www.gaystarnews.com/article/us-evangelists-blamed-ugandas-new-anti-gay-law250214#sthash.jPPAIbt3.8KZATsbq.dpuf
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 11:40 am
@RexRed,
It seems it only applies to flagrant violations of what is considered good taste in that country.

The same rule applies to the punishment of adultery is some countries.

Making an "in your face" big deal about the matters.
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 11:43 am
@spendius,
Oscar Wilde was imprisoned at the same time that the police had lists of known homosexuals running into tens of thousands.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 12:05 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

It seems it only applies to flagrant violations of what is considered good taste in that country.

The same rule applies to the punishment of adultery is some countries.

Making an "in your face" big deal about the matters.


So if you know a gay person in Uganda and don't report them you can be imprisoned.

"Flagrant violations of what is considered good taste?" NOT QUITE!

Why don't you read the bill instead of reading errors into it.

But, but, but... these homophobes are humane!!!??? WHAT?
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 12:27 pm
Question: Is religion an alternative lifestyle?
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 06:15 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
But, but, but... these homophobes are humane!!!??? WHAT?


They are Ugandan politicians Rex.

btw--In certain circles in England "Uganda" is a euphemism for heterosexual sex.

"She is thoroughly steeped in Ugandan culture" for example.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 06:19 pm
@RexRed,
Quote:
Is religion an alternative lifestyle?


Not for those who are religious. Except in atheist countries such as N. Korea.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 07:46 pm
Mo. lawmakers introduce ‘right to refuse service’ religious freedom bill
http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2014/02/mo-lawmakers-introduce-right-to-refuse-service-religious-freedom-bill/

When I used to work at the 7-11 as a night clerk, I had the authority to tell customer(s) to leave the store..

I would say put down your items I am not selling you anything, now please leave the store.

But when I worked at Sears "the customer was always right" satisfaction guaranteed" the customer at Sears outranked the sales clerk.

That did not give me a license at the 7-11 to deny anyone service because of prejudicial reasons.

I could deny anyone service but it was always accepted by management that I would have a reasonable motive for why I would deny service to anyone. I would refuse service sometimes on a daily basis and it was alwasy for logical reasons. They don't have an ID to buy cigarettes, they don't have any money for gas. etc.. regular stuff

If a customer was rude to someone in the store I might ask them to leave, or if they were too intoxicated I might refuse alcohol sale.

I really can't think of any other reason why I would refuse someone service.

Republican legislators like to write some divisive and malicious laws, one wonders the hateful kind of people who they are bidding for. They want to keep their own glass house intact while they toss stones.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 08:13 pm
How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Being Threatened in Just 10 Quick Questions
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rev-emily-c-heath/how-to-determine-if-your-religious-liberty-is-being-threatened-in-10-questions_b_1845413.html

1. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am not allowed to go to a religious service of my own choosing.
B) Others are allowed to go to religious services of their own choosing.

2. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am not allowed to marry the person I love legally, even though my religious community blesses my marriage.
B) Some states refuse to enforce my own particular religious beliefs on marriage on those two guys in line down at the courthouse.

3. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am being forced to use birth control.
B) I am unable to force others to not use birth control.

4. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am not allowed to pray privately.
B) I am not allowed to force others to pray the prayers of my faith publicly.

5. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) Being a member of my faith means that I can be bullied without legal recourse.
B) I am no longer allowed to use my faith to bully gay kids with impunity.

6. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am not allowed to purchase, read or possess religious books or material.
B) Others are allowed to have access books, movies and websites that I do not like.

7. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) My religious group is not allowed equal protection under the establishment clause.
B) My religious group is not allowed to use public funds, buildings and resources as we would like, for whatever purposes we might like.

8. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) Another religious group has been declared the official faith of my country.
B) My own religious group is not given status as the official faith of my country.

9. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) My religious community is not allowed to build a house of worship in my community.
B) A religious community I do not like wants to build a house of worship in my community.

10. My religious liberty is at risk because:

A) I am not allowed to teach my children the creation stories of our faith at home.
B) Public school science classes are teaching science.

Scoring key:

If you answered "A" to any question, then perhaps your religious liberty is indeed at stake. You and your faith group have every right to now advocate for equal protection under the law. But just remember this one little, constitutional, concept: this means you can fight for your equality -- not your superiority.

If you answered "B" to any question, then not only is your religious liberty not at stake, but there is a strong chance that you are oppressing the religious liberties of others. This is the point where I would invite you to refer back to the tenets of your faith, especially the ones about your neighbors.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Tue 25 Feb, 2014 08:42 pm
Mother’s Day On Our Radar – Lesbian Supermoms Take On Family Equality
http://thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/1-mothers-day-on-our-radar-lesbian-supermoms-take-on-family-equality/legal-issues/2012/05/13/39380#.Uw1UYPldVMh
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Fri 7 Mar, 2014 09:49 pm
All you need is love (MUST WATCH)
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=577730898958017&set=vb.200374086693702&type=2&theater
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2014 12:17 am
Sweden is fourth European nation to freeze aid to Uganda over anti-gay law
http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2014/03/sweden-is-fourth-european-nation-to-freeze-aid-to-uganda-over-anti-gay-law/
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2014 12:35 am
GFHC: Lady Zelig, Titanic Survivor
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/03/07/1282493/-GFHC-Lady-Zelig-
Titanic-Survivor?detail=facebook
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2014 12:40 am
Dalai Lama Voices Support for Gay Marriage
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/dalai-lama-voices-support-gay-marriage-n46906
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Mar, 2014 08:23 pm
https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/t1/1979693_10151980314715669_511271308_n.png
spendius
 
  0  
Reply Sun 9 Mar, 2014 03:59 pm
@RexRed,
As very few women "make history" we might assume that in general they are well behaved, as is right and proper, and that Eleanor was one of the exceptions.
RexRed
 
  0  
Reply Mon 10 Mar, 2014 02:29 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:

As very few women "make history" we might assume that in general they are well behaved, as is right and proper, and that Eleanor was one of the exceptions.


I consider the term "well behaved" as derogatory and insulting.

Children are well behaved, a trained monkey is well behaved.

Slaves are well behaved...

Women are not property but they are free and autonomous souls.
 

Related Topics

New York New York! - Discussion by jcboy
Prop 8? - Discussion by majikal
Gay Marriage - Discussion by blatham
Gay Marriage -- An Old Post Revisited - Discussion by pavarasra
Who doesn't back gay marriage? - Question by The Pentacle Queen
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/17/2024 at 07:05:03