@RexRed,
There is usually a disjunction between "knowing people" and "the mainstream of thought."
And between the "mainstream of thought" and the "expressions of the mainstream of thought" which often lead the inexperienced to interpret as the actual "mainstream of thought".
Those who "know people" and the actual "mainstream of thought", as opposed to the golden glitter of its posing surface, express themselves in politer versions of George Orwell's "stick rattling in a bucket" overview of the growing materialism in the world.
"It's the economy stupid" is not all that polite. Neither is "what will it mean for house prices?" when seeing news broadcast items of the shelling of Homs: bracketed with adverts oozing sumptuary delights.
I think we can take it that the Vatican "knows people". It has certainly had sufficient experience and its archives are vast. It has spies. I would be astonished if it is confused. Fox News is confused. CBS News is confused.
Anybody who "knows people" and the "mainstream of their thought" usually finds it very difficult to say anything good about them and a few have taken considerable pains to portray them in as unflattering a way as their skills allow. Lucien Freud for example.
If one might feel a sense, on contemplating the great Renaissance works of art, of the splendid lives, full of genius, glory and magnificence: the triumphs, the torch-lit feasts, midst half naked women, beautiful as goddesses. It would be some stretch to view Mr Freud's pictures so complacently.
One might compare the literary works of Giovanni Boccaccio to those of Mr William Burroughs to similar effect.