@Thomas,
Thomas wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:More important to the issue of scout leaders are lines that she didn't highlight:
i.e. Eighty-eight percent had a prior relationship with their victims;
and
Three out of four prisoners who victimized a child reported the crime took place in their own home or in the victim's home
I think that's a fair objection.
***
About the Boy Scouts' "no-gays" policy: Do the Girl Scouts have a corresponding "no-lesbians" policy? What level of abuse, if any, do they observe?
I'm not sure. Other than in cooperative kinds of things, I haven't had any significant dealings with the Girl Scouts since my daughter was a Brownie and then decided not to continue. I am fairly certain the the Girl Scouts do require their leaders to undergo extensive background checks, including checks on prior sexual misconduct, just like everybody else does these days. In truth, though most gay men would never harm a child, I believe there is still a much higher percentage of gay men who are pedophiles than there are lesbians who commit sex crimes. I don't know, but I am guessing that the percentage of lesbians who commit sex crimes are probably no higher than the percentage of heterosexual women, or at least very little difference would be found. And as previously posted statistics show, women overall have a much lower percentage of sex crimes than do men overall.
There has not been the history of Girl Scouts being molested by scout leaders as we have seen in the Boy Scouts of America.
When I was head of a large YWCA, my second in command was a lesbian woman who I would have trusted with anybody's kids or my life and did. She was a remarkable woman and I would have been far less successful in my job without her.
The only objection I've ever heard about lesbian scout leaders is that there is a tendency to promote the lesbian lifestyle, and I do know some mothers who have requested that their child's scout leader be straight for that reason. I honestly don't know if there is any real basis for that, however.