@BillRM,
Quote:
An NBC report on celibacy and the clergy found that
"any where from 23 percent to 58 percent" of the Catholic clergy
have a homosexual orientation.
Other studies [???????] find that approximately
half of American priests and seminarians are homosexually oriented.
Sociologist James G. Wolf in his book Gay Priests concluded that
48.5 percent of priests and 55.1 percent of seminarians were gay.
The percentage appears to be [????]
highest among priests under forty years of age.
Moreover, the percentage of gay men among religious congregations
of priests is believed to be [????] even higher
Bill, with the fullness of respect,
if u want to be taken seriously,
u can t present proof that way.
In order to have persuasive effect, u need to
IDENTIFY
the authority to whom u cite, and that authority must be
someone who your reader will respect enuf to believe his allegations;
(e.g., saying that William F. Buckley, Jr, or Ludwig von Mises,
or George Washington said " yadda, yadda, yadda ... " designating where
we can find that declaration, by page number or maybe by hypertext link).
Therefore, citing to "other studies" is not logically persuasive
because we have no way of knowing
who was studying nor
how well,
how logically, those studies were conducted.
The
anonymously cited "other studies" might have been of
my cousin Biff while he was closely observing and consulting with spiders
on his wall during one of his LSD trips.
When u allege that something " ... appears to be... "
u fail to tell us
TO WHOM it so "appears"
nor do u even
allege how nor Y it so "appears".
The same objections apply to your claim that
something "... is believed to be ... " whateverthehell.
BY WHOM is this believed ?
Is there a reason that we shoud think that this belief is logically justified ?
How & Y did he arrive at this belief ?
There are other logical defects in your display of evidence,
but this is enuf for now.
In order for your claims to even begin to support your conclusions
u must identify
who is supporting your reasoning
(if u are citing to someone for support of your conclusions)
and show the process of his logical reasoning so that
your readers can decide whether his analysis is worthy of belief.
Meaning no disrespect, Bill (truly, I don 't wish to hurt your feelings)
what u submitted is not evidence of anything
because it does not tend to show that anything is true or false, except
that u
DID cite to "Sociologist James G. Wolf" in a designated book;
if your readers have enuf respect for him, then thay might well
accept his findings, based upon their faith in him.
David