16
   

Was Allied bombing of Germany Jan - April 1945 a war crime?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 12:40 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Sounds to me like the crimes Bush committed with his illegal war against Iraq.
coluber2001
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 01:09 pm
Astrophysicist Freeman Dyson, in a 1993 documentary entitled, "A Glorious Accident" soberly and straightforwardly discussed his role working for the British government during WWII. He claimed that the Allies had virtually unopposed air power over Germany during the last three months of the war, and that the many cities bombed during that time, including Dresden, had virtually no effect on the termination of the war. The reason the bombing continued, he stated, was bureaucratic inertia.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 01:44 pm
@cicerone imposter,
"cicerone imposter" wrote:
Sounds to me like the crimes Bush committed with his illegal war against Iraq.


Other than the war itself being a violation of the UN charter, Bush did not commit any crimes in the war against Iraq, and certainly did nothing like the UK's bombing of Dresden.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 01:56 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
. . . and certainly did nothing like the UK's bombing of Dresden.


Tens of thousands (at least) of the survivors of dead Iraqis might not agree with that egregiously partisan point of view.

However, it is worth pointing out that you are engaged in two, two, two disinformation campaigns in one. The Royal Air Force was not alone in bombing Dresden in the famous fire bomb raids. The United States Army Air Force participated in the raids as well, and it is willfully disingenuous of you to make your statement as those the RAF alone were responsible.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 02:02 pm
That should read "as though the RAF alone were responsible."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 02:07 pm
@oralloy,
How about the torture of prisoners in Iraq? That's not Bush's responsibility?
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 02:48 pm
@Setanta,
"Setanta" wrote:
Tens of thousands (at least) of the survivors of dead Iraqis might not agree with that egregiously partisan point of view.


They'd be wrong. If we'd done a Dresden-style carpetbombing and firestorm, it would have been considerably more violent to the general populace than our attempts to hit specific military targets with precision weapons.



"Setanta" wrote:
However, it is worth pointing out that you are engaged in two, two, two disinformation campaigns in one. The Royal Air Force was not alone in bombing Dresden in the famous fire bomb raids. The United States Army Air Force participated in the raids as well, and it is willfully disingenuous of you to make your statement as though the RAF alone were responsible.


US bombers were trying to destroy the Dresden railyards (a legitimate target), and had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally started in Dresden.

Since any war crime at Dresden would be related that firestorm, I think it is fair to pin all the blame for any Dresden-related crimes solely on the UK.
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 02:55 pm
@cicerone imposter,
"cicerone imposter" wrote:
How about the torture of prisoners in Iraq? That's not Bush's responsibility?


I'll agree that the torture was a crime. I don't think Bush was responsible for that particular torture though.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 03:36 pm
@oralloy,
I guess the conservative mantra is, the buck doesn't stop here; blame everybody else.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 03:36 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

US bombers were trying to destroy the Dresden railyards (a legitimate target), and had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally started in Dresden.

Since any war crime at Dresden would be related that firestorm, I think it is fair to pin all the blame for any Dresden-related crimes solely on the UK.
since any war crime at Hiroshima and Nagasaki would be related to that firestorm, I think it is fair to pin all the blame for any Nagasaki-Hiroshima-related crimes solely on the USA.
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 03:39 pm
@oralloy,
Quote:
They'd be wrong. If we'd done a Dresden-style carpetbombing and firestorm, it would have been considerably more violent to the general populace than our attempts to hit specific military targets with precision weapons.


As you have pointed out yourself, the invasion of Iraq is a violation of the United Nations Charter, which we not only signed, but which we furthered as a goal at the end of the Second World War. Therefore, any attacks which we launched, including those which you allege were only carried out with precision weapons against military targets were as illegal as the invasion itself in general. Which means that you'd be wrong.

Allow me to correct that--you are wrong. Nothing new there.

Quote:
US bombers were trying to destroy the Dresden railyards (a legitimate target), and had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally started in Dresden.

Since any war crime at Dresden would be related that firestorm, I think it is fair to pin all the blame for any Dresden-related crimes solely on the UK.


Liar, liar, pants on fire. You are such a bullshit artist. One need only look at contemporary maps of Dresden to see that attacking the railway marshalling yards, and using incendiary bombs for the purpose, contributed to the fires which destroyed the city center of Dresden.

Quote:
The Eighth Air Force raids against the city’s railway facilities on 14 and 15 February resulted in severe and extensive damage that entirely paralyzed communications. The city’s passenger terminals and major freight stations, warehouses, and storage sheds were, when not totally destroyed, so severely damaged that they were unusable. Roundhouses, railway repair and work shops, coal stations, and other operating facilities, were destroyed, gutted, or severely damaged. The railway bridges over the Elbe river--vital to incoming and outgoing traffic--were rendered unusable and remained closed to traffic for many weeks after the raids.


Quote:
The RAF Bomber Command’s are raid on Dresden, conducted on the night of 13/14 February 1945, resulted in fires that did great damage to the city proper, particularly in the older and more densely built up areas. Early official Allied post-strike reports estimated that 85 per cent of the fully built-up city area was destroyed, that the old part of the city, which comprised the greater portion of the built-up areas was largely wiped out, that the majority of buildings in the inner suburbs was gutted, and that in the outer suburbs, few buildings were effected by the area bombing attack. Virtually all major public buildings appeared heavily gutted or severely damaged. Public utilities, and facilities such as slaughter houses, warehouses, and distribution centers, were severely affected. A very large number of the city’s industrial facilities were destroyed or severely damaged, with perhaps a four-fifth’s reduction in the productive capacity of the arms plants. Later British assessments, which were more conservative, concluded that 23 per cent of the city’s industrial buildings were seriously damaged and that 56 per cent of the non-industrial buildings (exclusive of dwellings) had been heavily damaged. Of the total number of dwelling units in the city proper, 78,000 were regarded as demolished, 27,70 temporarily uninhabitable but ultimately repairable, and 64,500 readily repairable from minor damage. This later assessment indicated that 80 per cent of the city’s housing units had undergone some degree of damage and that 50 per cent of the dwellings had been demolished or seriously damaged.


. . . and finally:

Quote:
In its 14 February daylight precision attacks on the Dresden Marshalling Yards, the Eighth Air Force employed 316 heavy bombers on the 14th for a tonnage of 487.7 tons of high explosives and 294.3 tons of incendiaries, a combined tonnage of 782 tons, and in its attacks on 15 February it employed 211 heavy bombers and 465.6 tons of high explosives (no incendiaries)--a total of 527 bombers and 1247.6 tons in the two days operations.


The Air Force can dance and sing to its heart's content, it won't alter the fact that their own report concludes that the built-up areas of the city were destroyed by fires, and that the Air Force itself acknowledges that Eight United States Army Air Force dropped 294.3 tons of incendiary bombs on the built up areas of the city. One could make the case that the RAF raid did the lion's share of the damage to non-military targets, but that does not absolve the USAAF of it's responsibility for the effects of having dropped nearly 300 tons of incendiary bombs on the city center of Dresden.

The passages quoted above are found in HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE 14-15 FEBRUARY 1945
BOMBINGS OF DRESDEN
.

Additionally, the Royal Air Force history web page has the following statement:

Quote:
"Part of the American Mustang-fighter escort was ordered to strafe traffic on the roads around Dresden to increase the chaos and disruption to the important transportation network in the region."


The RAF history also acknowledges that the RAF did the most serious damage, but no one (other than you) is attempting to claim that the American raids were some kind of clinical operation that did no damage to civilians.

Quote:
The Americans bombed Dresden again on the 15th and on 2nd March but it is generally accepted that it was the R.A.F. night raid which caused the most serious damage.


Source at the RAF History webpage.

Alexander McKee has stated that military barracks which were supposedly targeted by the Americans were far outside the city center, and were not in fact targeted. Furthermore, Mr. McKee points out that the "hutted camps" referred to in after-action reports were not in fact military targets, but were refugee housing. Finally, he points out that the bridges over the River Elbe were not targeted, and that the alleged strategic effect of the raids was illusory. (See Alexander McKee, Dresden 1945: The Devil's Tinderbox, New York, Dutton, 1984.)

I'll take the evidence of the United States Air Force Historical Division, the Royal Air Force history web page, and the work of Mr. McKee over your typical arrogant statements from authority any day.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 03:40 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

US bombers were trying to destroy the Dresden railyards (a legitimate target), and had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally started in Dresden.

Though that is disputed by some historians, it may be true.
However, it doesn't diminish the destruction nor is it comfort for the death civilians.


0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 03:44 pm
@Steve 41oo,
Ziiiiiinnnnngggggg . . .

Good shot, Boss . . .
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 04:58 pm
@Setanta,
"Setanta" wrote:
"oralloy" wrote:
They'd be wrong. If we'd done a Dresden-style carpetbombing and firestorm, it would have been considerably more violent to the general populace than our attempts to hit specific military targets with precision weapons.


As you have pointed out yourself, the invasion of Iraq is a violation of the United Nations Charter, which we not only signed, but which we furthered as a goal at the end of the Second World War. Therefore, any attacks which we launched, including those which you allege were only carried out with precision weapons against military targets were as illegal as the invasion itself in general.


Not really. It was not illegal for our soldiers to carry out precision strikes against military targets.



"Setanta" wrote:
Which means that you'd be wrong.


No, we didn't do anything in Iraq that was even remotely like the UK's carpet bombing and firestorm in Dresden.



"Setanta" wrote:
Allow me to correct that--you are wrong. Nothing new there.


While I have certainly been wrong before, it isn't very often.



"Setanta" wrote:
"oralloy" wrote:
US bombers were trying to destroy the Dresden railyards (a legitimate target), and had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally started in Dresden.

Since any war crime at Dresden would be related that firestorm, I think it is fair to pin all the blame for any Dresden-related crimes solely on the UK.


Liar, liar, pants on fire. You are such a bullshit artist. One need only look at contemporary maps of Dresden to see that attacking the railway marshalling yards, and using incendiary bombs for the purpose, contributed to the fires which destroyed the city center of Dresden.


I didn't say the US did no damage to the city. The US however, had nothing to do with the firestorm that the UK intentionally set there.



"Setanta" wrote:
Quote:
The Eighth Air Force raids against the city’s railway facilities on 14 and 15 February resulted in severe and extensive damage that entirely paralyzed communications. The city’s passenger terminals and major freight stations, warehouses, and storage sheds were, when not totally destroyed, so severely damaged that they were unusable. Roundhouses, railway repair and work shops, coal stations, and other operating facilities, were destroyed, gutted, or severely damaged. The railway bridges over the Elbe river--vital to incoming and outgoing traffic--were rendered unusable and remained closed to traffic for many weeks after the raids.


Quote:
The RAF Bomber Command’s are raid on Dresden, conducted on the night of 13/14 February 1945, resulted in fires that did great damage to the city proper, particularly in the older and more densely built up areas. Early official Allied post-strike reports estimated that 85 per cent of the fully built-up city area was destroyed, that the old part of the city, which comprised the greater portion of the built-up areas was largely wiped out, that the majority of buildings in the inner suburbs was gutted, and that in the outer suburbs, few buildings were effected by the area bombing attack. Virtually all major public buildings appeared heavily gutted or severely damaged. Public utilities, and facilities such as slaughter houses, warehouses, and distribution centers, were severely affected. A very large number of the city’s industrial facilities were destroyed or severely damaged, with perhaps a four-fifth’s reduction in the productive capacity of the arms plants. Later British assessments, which were more conservative, concluded that 23 per cent of the city’s industrial buildings were seriously damaged and that 56 per cent of the non-industrial buildings (exclusive of dwellings) had been heavily damaged. Of the total number of dwelling units in the city proper, 78,000 were regarded as demolished, 27,70 temporarily uninhabitable but ultimately repairable, and 64,500 readily repairable from minor damage. This later assessment indicated that 80 per cent of the city’s housing units had undergone some degree of damage and that 50 per cent of the dwellings had been demolished or seriously damaged.


. . . and finally:

Quote:
In its 14 February daylight precision attacks on the Dresden Marshalling Yards, the Eighth Air Force employed 316 heavy bombers on the 14th for a tonnage of 487.7 tons of high explosives and 294.3 tons of incendiaries, a combined tonnage of 782 tons, and in its attacks on 15 February it employed 211 heavy bombers and 465.6 tons of high explosives (no incendiaries)--a total of 527 bombers and 1247.6 tons in the two days operations.


Are you under the impression that anything you quoted contradicts me in any way?



"Setanta" wrote:
The Air Force can dance and sing to its heart's content, it won't alter the fact that their own report concludes that the built-up areas of the city were destroyed by fires, and that the Air Force itself acknowledges that Eight United States Army Air Force dropped 294.3 tons of incendiary bombs on the built up areas of the city.


Their report concludes that the built up areas were destroyed by fires set by the UK. And it says our 294.3 tons of incendiary bombs were aimed at the railyards (unlike the UK bombs, which the report says were aimed at the "city area").



"Setanta" wrote:
One could make the case that the RAF raid did the lion's share of the damage to non-military targets, but that does not absolve the USAAF of it's responsibility for the effects of having dropped nearly 300 tons of incendiary bombs on the city center of Dresden.


The effects of the bombs dropped by the US do not include the firestorm started by the UK.



"Setanta" wrote:
Additionally, the Royal Air Force history web page has the following statement:

Quote:
"Part of the American Mustang-fighter escort was ordered to strafe traffic on the roads around Dresden to increase the chaos and disruption to the important transportation network in the region."


The RAF history also acknowledges that the RAF did the most serious damage, but no one (other than you) is attempting to claim that the American raids were some kind of clinical operation that did no damage to civilians.


Where did I say they were a clinical operation with no damage to civilians? I don't recall saying anything like that.



"Setanta" wrote:
Alexander McKee has stated that military barracks which were supposedly targeted by the Americans were far outside the city center, and were not in fact targeted.


Maybe the reason for that is because we were targeting the railyards.



"Setanta" wrote:
I'll take the evidence of the United States Air Force Historical Division, the Royal Air Force history web page, and the work of Mr. McKee over your typical arrogant statements from authority any day.


I'm not familiar with this Alexander McKee guy, but based on your quote, it doesn't look like he even understands what the US was targeting at Dresden.

As for the US and UK websites, sounds like they are fully in agreement with me.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 04:59 pm
@oralloy,
Don'tcha remember "shock and awe?" That was the US term.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 05:11 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:
Their report concludes that the built up areas were destroyed by fires set by the UK. And it says our 294.3 tons of incendiary bombs were aimed at the railyards (unlike the UK bombs, which the report says were aimed at the "city area").

[...]


Maybe the reason for that is because we were targeting the railyards.


Well, this map might give you an idea about the "distance" between the city and the railyards:

http://i33.tinypic.com/jr9pol.jpg
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 05:48 pm
@cicerone imposter,
"cicerone imposter" wrote:
Don'tcha remember "shock and awe?" That was the US term.


Shock and Awe is the name given to the strategy of using massive numbers of precision munitions to annihilate a country's military and government while leaving civilians largely unscathed.

The strategy was leaked widely before the 2003 Iraq war as misdirection to throw Saddam's defenses off from our actual attack (the war actually started with a quick attempt to bomb Saddam, followed by a rapid ground advance).

But even if Shock and Awe had been carried out, the use of huge numbers of precision munitions against military and government targets would not have been comparable to the carpet bombing and firestorm that Dresden suffered.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 06:26 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy, Where do you get your information? Guesses? Well, here's the graph on Iraqi deaths from the war, and during the "shock and awe" period, the death rate was "way up there!"

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v97/imposter222/dbtimelinephp.png

oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 07:07 pm
@cicerone imposter,
"cicerone imposter" wrote:
oralloy, Where do you get your information?


Depends on the information. I got the information on how the Iraq war opened (a quick strike at Saddam followed by a rapid ground invasion) by watching the news during the war.




"cicerone imposter" wrote:
Guesses?


No. Not really.




"cicerone imposter" wrote:
Well, here's the graph on Iraqi deaths from the war, and during the "shock and awe" period, the death rate was "way up there!"


There was no "Shock and Awe period".

I am not sure what your graph uses as a source. Many of the tallies of "Iraqi's killed by the US" are absurdly inflated. However, it is certainly reasonable that the period of intense warfare resulted in more deaths than the later occupation.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 5 Dec, 2008 08:52 pm
@oralloy,
"Absurdly inflated?" Sounds like your opinion when you don't provide credible source to support your statement(s).
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 06:18:41