2
   

British Analysis of Palin

 
 
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 02:01 am
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/09/09/do0904.xml

Quote:


Sarah Palin is not such a small-town girl after all

By James Bennett
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 09/09/2008


It is clear that few in America, let alone Britain, have any idea what to make of Sarah Palin. The Republicans' vice-presidential candidate confounds the commentators because they don't understand the forces that shaped her in the remote state of Alaska.

Senator John McCain and Republican vice-presidential nominee Alaska Governor Sarah Palin
John McCain and Sarah Palin

Thus, most coverage dwells on exotica - the moose shooting, her Eskimo husband - combined with befuddlement at how a woman can go from being mayor of a town of 9,000, to governor, to prospective VP within the space of a few years.

But, having worked with Alaskans, I know something of the challenge she has faced, and why - contrary to what Democrats think - it could make her a powerful figure in the White House.

The first myth to slay is that she is a political neophyte who has come from nowhere. In fact, she and her husband have, for decades, run a company in the highly politicised commercial fishing industry, where holding on to a licence requires considerable nous and networking skills.

Her rise from parent-teacher association to city council gave her a natural political base in her home town of Wasilla. Going on to become mayor was a natural progression. Wasilla's population of 9,000 would be a small town in Britain, and even in most American states.

But Wasilla is the fifth-largest city in Alaska, which meant that Palin was an important player in state politics.

Her husband's status in the Yup'ik Eskimo tribe, of which he is a full, or "enrolled" member, connected her to another influential faction: the large and wealthy (because of their right to oil revenues) native tribes.

All of this gave her a base from which to launch her 2002 campaign for lieutenant (deputy) governor of Alaska.

She lost that, but collected a powerful enough following to be placated with a seat on, and subsequently the chairmanship of, the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, which launched her into the politics of Alaska's energy industry.

Palin quickly realised that Alaska had the potential to become a much bigger player in global energy politics, a conviction that grew as the price of oil rose. Alaska had been in hock to oil companies since major production began in the mid-1970s.

As with most poor, distant places that suddenly receive great natural-resource wealth, the first generation of politicians were mesmerised by the magnificence of the crumbs falling from the table. Palin was the first of the next generation to realise that Alaska should have a place at that table.

Her first target was an absurd bureaucratic tangle that for 30 years had kept the state from exporting its gas to the other 48 states. She set an agenda that centred on three mutually supportive objectives: cleaning up state politics, building a new gas pipeline, and increasing the state's share of energy revenues.

This agenda, pursued throughout Palin's commission tenure, culminated in her run for governor in 2006. By this time, she had already begun rooting out corruption and making enemies, but also establishing her bona fides as a reformer.

With this base, she surprised many by steamrollering first the Republican incumbent governor, and second, the Democratic former governor, in the election.

Far from being a reprise of Mr Smith Goes to Washington, Palin was a clear-eyed politician who, from the day she took office, knew exactly what she had to do and whose toes she would step on to do it.

The surprise is not that she has been in office for such a short time but that she has succeeded in each of her objectives. She has exposed corruption; given the state a bigger share in Alaska's energy wealth; and negotiated a deal involving big corporate players, the US and Canadian governments, Canadian provincial governments, and native tribes - the result of which was a £13 billion deal to launch the pipeline and increase the amount of domestic energy available to consumers. This deal makes the charge of having "no international experience" particularly absurd.

In short, far from being a small-town mayor concerned with little more than traffic signs, she has been a major player in state politics for a decade, one who formulated an ambitious agenda and deftly implemented it against great odds.

Her sudden elevation to the vice-presidential slot on the Republican ticket shocked no one more than her enemies in Alaska, who have broken out into a cold sweat at the thought of Palin in Washington, guiding the Justice Department's anti-corruption teams through the labyrinths of Alaska's old-boy network.

It is no surprise that many of the charges laid against her have come from Alaska, as her enemies become more and more desperate to bring her down. John McCain was familiar with this track record and it is no doubt the principal reason that he chose her.

Focusing on the exotic trappings of Alaskan culture may make Palin seem a quaint and inexplicable choice. But understanding the real background of her steady rise in politics suggests that Barack Obama and Joe Biden are underestimating her badly. In this, they join two former Alaskan governors, a large number of cronies, and a trail of enemies extending back over a decade.

James Bennett is the author of 'The Anglosphere Challenge'


 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 02:10 am
@gungasnake,
A British analysis??? It's an opinion published in a British conservative newspaper, okay but ...

From wikipedia:
Quote:
James Charles Bennett is an American businessman, with a background in technology companies and consultancy, and a writer on technology and international affairs.
During the 1980s he was involved in space-launch ventures, being a founder in 1985 of American Rocket Company (AMROC) whose technology found its way into SpaceShipOne. In the 1990s he was a technology consultant. He is President and Chairman of Internet Transactions Transnational, Inc., a 1997 Internet start-up, and Vice Chairman of Openworld, Inc., a nonprofit group promoting sustainable self-help initiatives.
He was a columnist for United Press International 2000-3, with a weekly piece The Anglosphere Beat; he has popularised the idea of the Anglosphere as significant, as of 2004, in world affairs and alignments. His book-length study The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century was published in 2004. He is co-founder and current President of the Anglosphere Institute of Alexandria, Virginia.
He is also is an Adjunct Senior Fellow of the Hudson Institute, and a contributor to its publications.

gungasnake
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 02:19 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I assume the British newspaper liked the analysis or they'd not have published it.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 02:20 am
@Walter Hinteler,
I mean, my understanding has always been that when you pay for something, it's yours.....
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 02:40 am
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

I assume the British newspaper liked the analysis or they'd not have published it.



Is this valid for opinions in US papers as well? (It's an opnion on the "Comment" pages (page 23), not an analysis)

If so, I would be very much surprised.

However, here in Europe, 'opinions' in newspaper are opinions of the writers, not the paper:
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 06:43 am
@gungasnake,

Better to read Maureen Dowd in the NYT on this subject.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/10/opinion/10dowd.html?em
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:03 am
The point is, as Bennett notes, that Palin is an exceedingly good choice for veep. McCain clearly opted for the future.

Oinkbama on the other hand opted for an old bum and missed the one he really wanted; here's the guy he needed:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8L-ZZSc8JU
0 Replies
 
Woiyo9
 
  4  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:03 am
@McTag,
Obviously, Ms. Dowd is a bitter woman. Ms. Dowd does not even have the decency of referring to "Palin" as Gov. Palin.
McTag
 
  3  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:18 am
@Woiyo9,

Steve Bell does not let considerations like "decency" curb his style

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/09/10/LIPSTICKPIG512.jpg
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:18 am
You really only need to read a little bit of this:

Quote:

Her first target was an absurd bureaucratic tangle that for 30 years had kept the state from exporting its gas to the other 48 states. She set an agenda that centred on three mutually supportive objectives: cleaning up state politics, building a new gas pipeline, and increasing the state's share of energy revenues.

This agenda, pursued throughout Palin's commission tenure, culminated in her run for governor in 2006. By this time, she had already begun rooting out corruption and making enemies, but also establishing her bona fides as a reformer.

With this base, she surprised many by steamrollering first the Republican incumbent governor, and second, the Democratic former governor, in the election.


Aside from everything else that should make it obvious where any dirt the dems and their butt-boy media manage to dig on Palin would be coming from.

Sarah Palin is the biggest breath of fresh air to hit American presidential politics since Teddy Roosevelt. She's very likely not a member of the CFR and that would be a first in recent years as well.

0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:19 am
@Woiyo9,
Yes. And you have been so dilligent in utilizing titles for Senator Obama, Senator Biden, and Senator Clinton.
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:20 am
@McTag,
Bell obviously doesn't have to look very far for inspiration for drawing pigs; the nearest mirror would suffice.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 07:23 am
@Woiyo9,

Ms Dowd may be a tad bitter, but she nevertheless asks some pointed questions. Do you think we'll get the answers?

"In the end, none of it may matter, since Palin has rocketed in the polls, drawing women and men with her vapid " if vivacious and visceral " scripted cheerleading. But if you’re reading this, Charlie, we want to know everything, including:

What kind of budget-cutter makes a show of getting rid of the state plane, then turns around and bills taxpayers for the travel of her husband and kids between Juneau and Wasilla and sticks the state with a per-diem tab to stay in her own home?

Why was Sarah for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against the Bridge to Nowhere, and why was she for earmarks before she was against them? And doesn’t all this make her just as big a flip-flopper as John Kerry?

What kind of fiscal conservative raises taxes and increases budgets in both her jobs " as mayor and as governor?

When the phone rings at 3 a.m., will she call the Wasilla Assembly of God congregation and ask them to pray on a response, as she asked them to pray for a natural gas pipeline?

Does she really think Adam, Eve, Satan and the dinosaurs mingled on the earth 5,000 years ago?

Why put out a press release about her teenage daughter’s pregnancy and then spend the next few days attacking the press for covering that press release?

As Troopergate unfolds here " an inquiry into whether Palin inappropriately fired the commissioner of public safety for refusing to fire her ex-brother-in-law " it raises this question: Who else is on her enemies list and what might she do with the F.B.I.?

Does she want a federal ban on trans fat in restaurants and a ban on abortion and Harry Potter? And which books exactly would have landed on the literature bonfire if she had had her way with that Wasilla librarian?

Just how is it that Fannie and Freddie have cost taxpayers money (since they haven’t yet)?

Does she talk in tongues or just eat caribou tongues?

What does she have against polar bears? "

Woiyo9
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 08:46 am
@McTag,
When you get to this level, there is no point in attempting to address your apparent bias.

"When the phone rings at 3 a.m., will she call the Wasilla Assembly of God congregation and ask them to pray on a response, as she asked them to pray for a natural gas pipeline?"

"Does she talk in tongues or just eat caribou tongues?"

These so called "questions" make you look like an ass.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 10:04 am
@Woiyo9,
And there's no stupidity in making the phrase "lipstick on a pig is still a pig" a big deal by the conservatives when McCain used that phrase before Obama.

It's okay for conservatives to use any language, but they want to restrict the liberals from using the same one because it's "offensive."

Group up!
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 10:15 am
@McTag,
McTag wrote:


Steve Bell does not let considerations like "decency" curb his style

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/09/10/LIPSTICKPIG512.jpg


That just goes to prove Obama meant what he said and the comment was directed squarely at Palin.
0 Replies
 
Woiyo9
 
  2  
Reply Thu 11 Sep, 2008 10:28 am
@cicerone imposter,
I think you all need to grow up and get over this non issue.

Apparently, you can not be objective.
Endymion
 
  2  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2008 01:10 am
@Woiyo9,
oh what ... and Palin is?

here's what Britain has to offer
http://redstaterebels.org/2008/09/michael-palin-for-president/

Tai Chi
 
  1  
Reply Fri 12 Sep, 2008 12:00 pm
@Endymion,
Now there's a Palin worth the vote!

(Hello Endy -- nice to see you too.)
0 Replies
 
A Lone Voice
 
  2  
Reply Sat 13 Sep, 2008 12:28 am
@gungasnake,
Quote:

In short, far from being a small-town mayor concerned with little more than traffic signs, she has been a major player in state politics for a decade, one who formulated an ambitious agenda and deftly implemented it against great odds.


I thought this was an interesting comment from the article.

If you look at it objectively, Palin and Obama seem to have run a similar course. About the same age, both becoming involved in state politics.

And Biden and McCain have spent a similar amount of time in the senate.

Should we talking about experience? Or do the repubs have the wrong person running for president?

Or do the dems have their ticket backwards themselves?
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » British Analysis of Palin
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 10:48:54