McG
Thanks for responding.
I'm assuming the stuff in red is supposed to indicate fiction. I say "I am assuming" because most of the red stuff does not really indicate any fiction in the piece.
Some examples:
McGentrix wrote:This is what I don't understand: All of a sudden nothing seems to matter. First, they said they wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive." But they didn't get him. So now they tell us that it doesn't matter. Our mission is greater than one man. This doesn't mean we have STOPPED looking for him. We have 100's of troops combing the hills and keeping tabs on possible locations. We haven't forgotten about him.
Jeez, I must have missed the part where Sister Joan said "...we've STOPPED looking for him" or that "...we have forgotten about him."
What she actually said was that they are now telling us that it doesn't really matter, our mission is greater than one man.
So the supposed fiction you pointed out was some fiction you included -- not Sister Joan.
Quote:Then they said they wanted Saddam Hussein, "dead or alive." He's apparently alive but we haven't got him yet, either. However, President Bush told reporters recently, "It doesn't matter. Our mission is greater than one man." Again, doesn't mean we've stopped looking for him. And, if you think about it, the mission IS bigger than one man.
Once again, McG, Sister Joan did not say that we've stopped looking for him. She said we've been told that it doesn't matter and that our mission is greater than one man.
Even you pointed out that the mission IS bigger than one man.
So you are agreeing with Sister Joan and then posting your agreement in red to make it look as though she included fiction. Actually, you included a bit of fiction in suggesting that she said "...we've stopped looking for him."
Quote:Finally, they told us that we were invading Iraq to destroy their weapons of mass destruction. Now they say those weapons probably don't exist. Maybe never existed. Apparently that doesn't matter either.Aaaahhh...the luxury of hindsight. Sure, we know that the threat of WMD is as serious as we were led to believe. They DID exist, thet STILL exist, we just haven't found 'em yet. We will.
McG, do you have your head on straight today? Every word Sister Joan said here is right on the mark. It is not fiction at all.
Now you are offering your guesses about whether the WMDs actually did exist -- and whether or not they will be found.
But that is not fiction on the part of Sister Joan -- that is hubris on the part of McG.
Quote:Except that it does matter.
I know we're not supposed to say that. I know it's called "unpatriotic."Pfft. That comment is only present to raise peoples ire. Has no basis in fact.
No it is not. And it has a hell of a lot more basis in fact than your assertions that there definitely are WMD's and that they will be found.
Quote:But it's also called honesty. And dishonesty matters. It matters that the infrastructure of a foreign nation that couldn't defend itself against us has been destroyed on the grounds that it was a military threat to the world.
It matters that it was destroyed by us under a new doctrine of "pre-emptive war" when there was apparently nothing worth pre-empting. It surely matters to the families here whose sons & daughters went to war to make the world safe from weapons of mass destruction and will never come home. That's what soldiers do. Better to have Iraqi death and destruction than US death and destruction. My opinion only, the author appears ok with that.
There is no fiction in what Sister Joan said in those couple of paragraphs. You simply disagree with how she feels.
You really do seem out of sorts, McG. You usually think things through much better than this.
Quote:It matters to families in the United States whose life support programs were ended, whose medical insurance ran out, whose food stamps were cut off, whose day care programs were eliminated so we could spend the money on sending an army to do what did not need to be done. Oh, please. food stamps were eliminated because of the war? Insurance policies lapsed because of the war? Uh, huh.
Sister Joan may have stretched this a bit -- but to me, it sounds as though she just didn't want to go through the problem in detail.
She certainly is right that huge amounts of money is being spent in this endeavor that could easily have been spent more productively elsewhere. (Perhaps even in a true fight against terrorism, rather than in vendetta against a guy who made his father look like a dickhead!)
Quote:It matters to the Iraqi girl whose face was burned by a lamp that toppled over as a result of a U.S. bombing run.
It matters to Ali, the Iraqi boy who lost his family - and both his arms in a U.S. air attack. I am saddened by the loss of innocent lives. But, notice how the author avoids talking about the poor iraqi girl who saw her sister raped, tortured and executed before her eyes and then had the same done to her by the Husseins.
Oh, give me a break, willya. Yeah, Saddam was a sadistic son-of-a-bitch, but everything Sister Joan said in her comment is correct. No fiction here.
And I might point out to you that one of the big complaints over in Iraq right now has to do with women feeling much more unsafe than they did under Saddam. From what I have read, there is more rape going on now than under Saddam -- and more violence towards women.
Quote:It matters to the people in Baghdad whose water supply is now fetid, whose electricity is gone, whose streets are unsafe, whose 158 government ministries' buildings and all their records have been destroyed, whose cultural heritage and social system has been looted and whose cities teem with anti-American protests. Power levels are generally at the pre-war conditions, the looting was done BY the Iraqi's, not by the US as the author would imply.
One: I would love to see you substantiate that power levels are generaly at pre-war conditions.
Two: You did not refer to the water supply.
Three: At no point do I see Sister Joan implying that the looting was done by the US rather than by Iraqi's who are not being controlled as they should be.
The fiction is yours, McG, not Sister Joans.
Quote:It matters that the people we say we "liberated" do not feel liberated in the midst of the lawlessness, destruction and wholesale social suffering that so-called liberation created. Which people? A majority of people DO feel liberated in Iraq. See other thread. Some people in Iraq will never be happy with any form of governmet. Hell, people in the US will never by happy with the government!
Neither of you has a leg to stand on regarding this issue. We honestly do not know how the people feel -- but I know if there were an occupying army here watching over me, I certainly would not feel liberated.
Quote:Once again, this article is full of lies and half-truths. It is fiction.
Well if that is true, McG -- as I suggested before...
...why not point them out and we can discuss them?
But actually point out a few lies and half-truths rather than making stuff up.
I do agree with the part where you said: "It is fiction." But I think it applies to your response -- not to Sister Joan's article.