@cicerone imposter,
I can't comprehend your written words ci. That post is incoherent.
I'm seeking an explanation from your side on the problem of the "missionary position" and of the inconsistency and hypocrisy involved in organs of media, which wande has quoted from to support the case for teaching evolution, not only with reference to the "missionary position, but also with their failing to praise Dr Conrad Murray's exemplary reproductive record which cannot but attract the admiration of even a half-baked evolutionist. They have actually deprecated it.
It is well known that large cultural entities contain a small number of superior intelligences. It is also well known that any attempt by such minds to reduce Nature to its simplest possible quantitative form units by the mechanical differentiation of measuring and counting inevitable leads to an atomic theory.
In Classical science the reduction was to
minature forms: on continually dividing a piece of string they always had string even if it was too small to be seen. In the Christian culture the reduction is to
minimal quanta and that being of energy. On the one hand sensuous nearness of static matter exemplified by the nude statue and on the other the abstractions of fugues and modern painting. Atomic particles for us being different manifestations of energy showing on instruments the properties of matter.
The
inner vision required to contemplate such phenomena is a feature of a religious view centred upon the passionate contemplation of extension in the third dimension symbolised by the spire of a cathedral just as the sensuous nearness of the Magian culture is symbolised by the dome or cave from which direct light is excluded. The former having an infinite God and the latter 30,000 gods with human attributes and a propensity to interfere in even the most mundane of human activities. Notions in the Classical being concerned with "stuff" and "form" and notions in the Christian science being concerned with "capacity" and "intensity".
This
inner vision is not available to the lay person such as an average grade school teacher and the vast majority of grade students and is self-evidently not at the disposal of any of the writers of the many articles which wande has brought us.
As Spengler wrote many years ago--" A quantum of action is an extension-element conceived without regard to sensible quality of any kind, which eludes all relation with sight and touch, for which the expression "shape" has no meaning whatever---something therefore which would be utterly inconceivable to a Classical researcher."
Tell that to the kids if you want to give them science.
Try to remember ci. that you don't know any science. You don't even know what science is. So what you are doing on a science thread and recommending things to the authorities regarding the teaching of science is ridiculous. Your only justification for your position is that you seek to undermine Christian sexual morality for subjective reasons of your own. Just as the media conglomerates do in the interests of profit accumulations.
General promiscuity is the freedom to do as one will with one's own body. Abortion is a sort of sticking plaster to try to heal the wounds of promiscuity and the women have to suffer the consequences.
