@reasoning logic,
Quote:Please share your intellectual honesty....
I have done. I've named all the key writers on these two threads at one time or another. I can't post their works. I don't do spoonfeeding adults.
If your senses don't ever fry your brain with excess of perception it is due to your perception being limited by your socialisation and experience and that isn't something a few well chosen words from me is going to correct.
It is very likely that there is a benefit, both to the individual and to society, that perceptions are limited and that educational policy has doing so as one of its objectives.
As Lenin said--"there are the ones who do and there are ones to whom it is done". Or somesuch. The pro evolution teaching gang whose thoughts have reached this thread show every sign that they are all in the latter category. And yet Americans are seemingly mortified at having it done to them rather than them being the ones who do. And many here as well.
Geoffrey Gorer in The Americans put it down to too much Mommying. Daddy being too busy creating a superpower.
You should read more carefully and in better stuff.
Tell me rl--what do you think a study of fossils contributes to the education of the 300+ million people in a Superpower compared to the contribution of the 50 most significant rock musicians or movie makers?
I don't know what you mean by Farmerman's question. He even thinks Stanford and Princeton are objects in his toy-fort fantasies. As such they will do his bidding he thinks. Phooey!! His verbal trick is merely in the service of associating himself with those elite institutions. He hasn't even bothered responding to my post about the gene being a dynamic entity. He talks about such things and he has no idea what they are. Such words are like a flower in his lapel.
A car with square wheels says it all. And on a science thread too. Sheesh!! Underestimation of his audience is fm's fetish.
