Latest Challenges to the Teaching of Evolution

That's because your world is much different than for the rest of us.

Meanwhile in science land, biologists are completely unaware that English pub hicks disapprove of their research.

A
R
T

Their argument has a simple anology. Modern transportation is evil because people die in cars. If we eliminate cars, the world will be better off.

Just look at the outcome of all cultures with any clothes on; they have engaged in wars, rape, murder, and terrorism. LOSE THE EVIL CLOTHES PEOPLE!!!!
Lets discuss that history, shall we ? What was the first and second deadliest wars ? Were they religiously motivated ? I suppose the Nazis were Atheists.....

But Frenchmen molest children. We should prevent children from the damages of Francophiles and Paedolphiles.

All wars are deadly. Humans engage in wars and religion as part of our nature.

What happened to your proving it was religion ?

That argument is beneath you arty. It seems you are a racist, we just have to agree on who are the niggers.

Meanwhile in science land, excavators unearthing exciting transitional fossils are completely unaware of Austrailian custodians who disapprove of their discovery.

A
R
T

Not sure who you mean....I look at fossils very approvingly.

Good for you. Here is a treat.



A
R
T

Can't help you if you lack logic.

Ahhh....arty.....I have licked that thing for ages now...it is as bland as any Atheist.....lots of colour but no taste.

You have correctly identified the problem but failed to apportion it to the correct person.

Naw, Im not gonna say anything, nope, not me, NAw...

Awww go on...I set it up for someone....it might as well be you.....have a freeby....

Ken Miller giving a lecture on the Dover trial and how irreducibile complexity was refuted:

Thanks for the video. It helps my understanding a great deal.

I can't say I do Io. They have that basic flaw that one might say almost anything about them, given the range of choice, and they cannot answer back. They are ideal in that respect for anti-Iders who, as I had Gerard Manley Hopkins explain earlier, expect, indeed are astonished, that their state of mind is not shared by everyone. Fake fossils are even more suitable for the purpose.

I can see no educational purpose to them outside of providing ammunition for those who feel a vocation to make a career in fossil science. They seem to provide stimulation to the necrophiliac tendency and to those who prefer looking backwards to looking forwards. They have a sinister aspect not unlike Hamlet contemplating Yorick's skull.