@farmerman,
Don't you think fm that the Drs, Whoses, who both seem amply qualified from a scientific point of view, far more so than yourself, are unaware of your reasons for asserting that they are ignorant of other relevant scientific disciplines? Do you seriously think that they are unprepared for such naive reproaches?
They obviously have some sort of hierarchy relating to the importance of the various scientific disciplines. The science of geology, for example, is almost insignificant when compared to those scientific disciplines which deal with the care and maintenance of the mores and methods of social organisation which we are habituated to, and which have proved so convenient to us, and in no way can be allowed to undermine the latter and superior disciplines. And the same applies to evolution science which is of almost zero interest to the vast majority of the population, despite the obsessions of those professionally engaged in it for whatever reason, whereas the inhibitions to the drift towards totalitarianism, an inevitable consequence of complexity in modern society which only some new form of Ludditism might prevent bearing it's blossoms and fruits, succulent though they might seem when thought of individually and partially and grossly subjectively. (see Ignore button in your own head) .
On what basis do you assume the ignorance of the professors regarding such a trivial and trite objection.
Well--I know the answer to that. It is that objections come from those who are ignorant of "relevant scientific disciplines" and not only ignorant but wilfully so. Selective exposure to already approved sources.
As if you have scientific discipline simply by dropping the phrase into your soundbite---the most effortless method known to mankind of posing as an expert in front of sodbusters--and a complete joke on the evidence you have provided and particulary that aspect of it which assumes a sodbuster audience. As that post and most of your posts do.
The sciences involving the creation of millions of human psyches, out of the mass of cranium glop, which are suitable for the pursuit of further progress and extravagances of luxuries, are sciences by the side of which geology and botany are insignificant and really only suitable as hobbies for parsons and vicars and curates.
When you can show that your project will bring us greater progress in regard to our subjugation of nature, which I assume you approve of, than the progress we have seen so far under a very mild Christian dispensation, somebody might take some notice of you, but as you never dare attempt such a thing we are well justified in treating you with considerable suspicion.
