@farmerman,
Quote:The argument that a secular public-school science program is a "force for the spread of atheism "is as dum and lame brained an argument as is a 6000 year old earth.
The argument is not the same thing as the operative policy. The policy would come in after the argument is won. The operating policy could not avoid being a "force for the spread of atheism".
There are 3 million teachers teaching 50 million students in 90,000 public schools. A secular public school science program would necessitate them ALL being content to teach an anti-religion curriculum. In the Soviet Union, where such a school programme operated teachers were either Communist Party members or approved by Communist Party members and controlled by them.
Hence a secular system would operate right through teacher selection, curriculum and administration all the way up to Washington. Religious people would have to be excluded from the whole system and, to make sense, all private schools would need to be brought into line. As would schools in the overseas "territories".
With average salaries of teachers being a trifling $46,000 (I read) the statistics of intelligence would obviously result in a relatively talent free teaching profession operating in circumstances where tacit approval was given for student's religious attitudes being dismissed with sneers (as unofficial asides not in the curriculum) such as "dumbass" and "superstitious nonsense" and "lame-brained" with jocular references to Flying Spaghetti Monsters and other entities which these threads exhibit in profusion. One only need imagine the anti-IDers on here teaching classes but on a nationwide basis and deriving their numbers, the 3 million, from that section of the population which is signed up to the whole of the left's agenda and a goodly proportion likely to be militant about the matters involved which it would be bootless to mention as they are so well known.
In my view such a scenario would usher in not just the spread of atheism but the spread of Communism.