@farmerman,
Quote:If there actually was a scientific case to be made for creationism, the academic freedom argument would work. But there isn't such a case, and so the academic freedom argument fails.
A point that the Biblical literalists and the IDers fail to recognize
Oh no. You have it on Ignore and hence, having not listened to it, your conclusion is based on that. Thus circular. Unscientific, And stupid.
Asuming dangerous flirtations are stupid.
There is a scientific case to be made for creationism and therefore the academic freedom argument does work but if you have it on Ignore, as you do, the idea that it fails is, once again, like everything you say, circular and, as such, drivel.
Saying there isn't a case is a mere assertion and thus not worth a blow on a ragman's trumpet as is also any conclusions which automatically follow based on the assertion.
Any self respecting infidel would be appalled at your pathetic defence of his position. He might easily ask you to leave the field on the basis that every time you pontificate you make infidels look like complete diddicoes.