" HOW GUN CONTROL LOST "

I see that a number of surrounding states are now inserting new rules into their own state codes of regulations governing gun ownership. These include the requirements for reporting stolen or missing guns, etc.
Heller may loosen the rights to gun ownership but states have asserted the responsibilities to control and regulate this ownership.

Yes.



Mostly, its to instill discipline so that thay will hold their positions,
and not flee in the face of the enemy, in combat; (that has been how
most military units have been defeated).
I am at a loss to know to what specific regimentation u refer.
I did not feel "regimented" while I was bearing arms in the US Army.
I am not aware of any complaints of "regimentation."




People had whatever constitutional rights thay had
LONG BEFORE u were born
and their rights do not depend upon what u think.

Next November, if u *THINK* that people shud not vote,
thay have the right to do so regardless of what u think.





In your own opinion,
was the jurisdiction which was invested in government changed by "emotional control"
of the creators of government? Thay decreed that :
"... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"
with no comments about emotions.
Note, incidentally, that NO police existed in the USA when the Bill of Rights was enacted.
Everyone had to defend himself
from the violence of man or beast, as a matter of survival.




Yes.
Principles of self defense
and the right of immediate access to emergency equipment
to effect that right are always very good for anyone everywhere.





That means that government has NO JURISDICTION,
(NO authority) to infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms,
the same way that it cannot choose your favorite color for u.




How do u KNOW, since u did not read it ?
The USSC is the final decision maker; there is no appeal from it
to any other body.




No.
The Amendment cannot change without a constitutional amendment.
It is what it always was, since 1791.



The natural right to keep and bear arms is acknowledged and defended
by the BILL OF RIGHTS, not by the bill of NEEDS.



No, but those employers might be concerned about
federal civil or criminal litigation as per:

" UNITED STATES CODE TITLE 18

CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I

CRIMES CHAPTER 13 - CIVIL RIGHTS

§§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten,
or intimidate any inhabitant of any State, . . .
in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right
or privilege secured to him by
the Constitution or laws of the United States,
. . .
They shall be fined not more than $10,000
or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both;
and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment
for any term of years or for life. " [emphasis added by David]




I support FREEDOM OF CHOICE in self defense,
the same as in choice of religion.




David

Do you remember, or are aware, of the sarcastic Prayer For the Czar in Fiddler On the Roof? It went something like this, "May the Czar have a long and healthy life, far, far away." See, no one was allowed to say anything negative about the Czar, but the "far, far away" got the point across. That is how I feel about people with guns. They should all live a long and healthy life, far, far away.

No need to reply.

I feel that way about people who are politically correct,
authoritarian-collectivists.
I believe that communist North Korea
is sufficiently far away for the politically correct.

America belongs to us.


David