1
   

George Bush's Legacy

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 08:53 am
kickycan wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Bush is a psychopathic killer; he's responsible for the killing of some 100,000 innocent Iraqis.


BullShit !!


Reallly? Perhaps you could enlighten us on the truth then. Just how many innocent Iraqis is Bush responsible for killing?


None.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 08:53 am
kickycan wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Bush is a psychopathic killer; he's responsible for the killing of some 100,000 innocent Iraqis.


BullShit !!


Just how many innocent Iraqis is Bush responsible for killing?


None.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 09:11 am
When the Nazis overran their neighbors, they would take all the civilians out and start shooting them one at a time, until someone gave up the location of the hiding resistance.

It's not a tactic I or any American would condone - which is exactly why Al Queda and the Tailban hide in houses full of women and children.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 09:59 am
cjhsa wrote:
When the Nazis overran their neighbors, they would take all the civilians out and start shooting them one at a time, until someone gave up the location of the hiding resistance.

It's not a tactic I or any American would condone - which is exactly why Al Queda and the Tailban hide in houses full of women and children.


And most criminals in the US hide amongst "houses (or neighborhoods) full of women and children." What's your point?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 10:01 am
We don't drop bombs on those wanted by the law. Maybe we should.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 10:35 am
cjhsa wrote:
We don't drop bombs on those wanted by the law. Maybe we should.


You "probably" answered your own question, but I still doubt that you understand it.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 12:50 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
kickycan wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
Bush is a psychopathic killer; he's responsible for the killing of some 100,000 innocent Iraqis.


BullShit !!


Just how many innocent Iraqis is Bush responsible for killing?


None.


To quote a moron I know..."BullShit !!"
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 01:40 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
We don't drop bombs on those wanted by the law. Maybe we should.


You "probably" answered your own question, but I still doubt that you understand it.


I didn't ask a question. Did someone ask a question? MAKE SURE TO ASK IT DIRECTLY TO CI'S FACE HE'S A LITTLE HARD OF HEARING.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 01:53 pm
kickycan wrote:


To quote a moron I know..."BullShit !!"


Your mom does have a way with words.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 02:21 pm
rabel22 wrote:
MM
You are the one being untruthful. By demanding the names of the Iraq people killed and maimed you are creating a strawman. Did terroists kill and maim some of the people pictured, yes but so did our troops. Bush started this war and is responsible for the deaths of our troops and the deaths of the Iraqis. All the strawman replies by you don't mean crap. When a war is fought any intelligent person knows that innocents are going to die and should take this into account. I disagree with any war that is fought on foreign soil when that country hasn't attacked us. Bush and his government fits the mold of a bully who uses others to fight the wars he hasn't got the guts to fight himself. Think Vietmaum.


Now, show where I EVER demanded names of anyone.
You are so confused that you cant even read what was written,
I have nevere demanded names of anyone, killed, wounded, maimed, or anything else you want to say.

YOU are the one that accused me of believing that soldiers dont kill civilians, yet you cant find any posts from me that even hint at that.

Quote:
I disagree with any war that is fought on foreign soil when that country hasn't attacked us.


So then you disagree with WW1, WW2 (in Europe), the Korean war, Bosnia, Desert Storm, Afghanistan, the Spanish-American war, the American Revolution, etc.
After all, in none of those wars was the US attacked first.

But I challenge you again...show a link, one link, to any statement I have ever made that said that soldiers didnt kill civilians.

And while your at it, show where I asked for names of any civilians killed in Iraq.
My whole point was to challenge the pics that were posted.
After all, anyone can show pics of a dead body and claim that they were killed by a certain group of people.
You need to show proof.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 02:52 pm
The Fact is this.
BUSH's Legacy IS Bushtardian legacy.

Wave your flags and be as parochial as you can.
Rama
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 05:55 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
kickycan wrote:


To quote a moron I know..."BullShit !!"


Your mom does have a way with words.


You should really start being a lot more cautious about who you f*ck with on this site.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 06:46 pm
kicky, H2O contributes absolutely nothing by his posts; just ignore the bastard.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 06:47 pm
KIKYCAN, ARE YOU THREATENING ME WITH VIOLENCE?

I do believe that is a rule that will get you banned for life if broken.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 06:52 pm
If anybody needs to be banned from a2k, it's you H2O. You contribute nothing and rabble rouse wherever you post.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 07:03 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
........


Go away pipsqueak . . .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 07:20 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
........


Go away pipsqueak . . .


Here's another proof of H2O's "contribution" to a2k.
0 Replies
 
rabel22
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 07:25 pm
MM Show me where I said all wars are wrong. And while you didn't demand names your partner in crime did. And I still stand by my strawman comment. You make statements without justification and when someone calls you on it you develop a strawman comment such as prove that statement. Strawman.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 07:27 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:


Here's another proof of H2O's "contribution" to a2k.


I would like to thank you for your vote of confidence. Thanks Cool
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Aug, 2008 07:33 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
KIKYCAN, ARE YOU THREATENING ME WITH VIOLENCE?


I would never do such a thing. I'm not a violent person. But I'm not the only one who you've pissed off on A2K. I'm just saying that a person such as yourself who has all his business and personal contact information right out there in their profile should really think before they act like an assh*le to a bunch of strangers on the internet. Now, I have gleaned from your posts that you aren't the brightest bulb in the box, but I would think even you, Kevin from Athens, would be able to understand that.

Just a tip from your uncle Kicky.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 10:25:19