1
   

George Bush's Legacy

 
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 04:00 pm
Sorry for the folloing comment about the person and his legacy.
If any person who adore/admire/appreciate this person then i should come to the conclussion that those admirrors are innocen or ill informed
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 04:08 pm
CI, you did a great job fleshing out my list, which could be much longer. Thanks!
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 04:11 pm
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 04:48 pm
Some views unconnected with the subjuct but relevant.


Indira Gandhi( daughter of Nehru( a friend of mahathama gand) had passed a law which had wiped out all Maharajas with their vegitarian elephants.
She was shot dead by the trustworthy security office who had travellled with her around the globe.
That was history.
Should the candidates dare to curb the pover of bigwigs?
I mean the banal barbaric criminal Cprporate CEO'S
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 05:50 pm
Quote:
Maharajas with their vegitarian elephants


That is still legal in Alabama.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 05:53 pm
Not gold medols but civilized intellectual discourse with faulty enliBUSH
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 06:18 pm
My EnliBUSH is not perfect like my computer.
USA had allowed a resident in toilet( read white) house.

I am a globalist not a flag waving consumer.

Tell me about BUSH. I am just curious.
Rama
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 06:27 pm
Black and white
We are not against you
Are you with US?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 06:34 pm
real life wrote:
parados wrote:
In case you missed it, the decision to sue Microsoft was initiated under the first Bush. Microsoft failed to live up to the consent decree they signed. Anyone that blames Clinton is attempting to rewrite history.


Wrong.

The decision to sue Microsoft was in 1998.

http://money.cnn.com/1998/05/18/technology/microsoft_suit/

I see. You are talking about the suit where 20 states and the DoJ sued Microsoft in 1998 and not the 1995 case which most people making your silly claim refer to. Just another fine example of your attempt to rewrite history. The states were going to sue with or without the Feds. The case was settled in 2001 I believe. (After the collapse of the NASDAQ) The suit didn't hold up Windows98 so I am unclear why you think the suit caused the tech collapse. Please be specific or provide a source.

At the time of the suit the NASDAQ was about 1850. The NASDAQ climbed to 5000 2 years later before collapsing. The filing of the suit could not have caused the collapse because the NASDAQ was lower at the time of the suit and didn't get that low again until after 9/11.

The suit was filed in early 98 when the NASDAQ was at 1850. The NASDAQ didn't hit 2,000 until Nov of 1998. It didn't hit 3000 until Nov of 1999. It hit 4000 in Dec of 1999. It hit 5000 in March of 2000. Yeah.. right, filing the suit caused the collapse of the NASDAQ. It just took a huge climb in the market and 2 years after the suit before it fell to a point HIGHER than the time the suit was filed.
0 Replies
 
Ramafuchs
 
  0  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 06:40 pm
Let me ask those American legal/ computer intellectuals from India.
why the hell you speak English which is not my mothertongue.
I was made in India for which i have no regrets.
But i am a German by choice
Rama Fuchs
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Aug, 2008 07:39 pm
parados wrote:
real life wrote:
parados wrote:
In case you missed it, the decision to sue Microsoft was initiated under the first Bush. Microsoft failed to live up to the consent decree they signed. Anyone that blames Clinton is attempting to rewrite history.


Wrong.

The decision to sue Microsoft was in 1998.

http://money.cnn.com/1998/05/18/technology/microsoft_suit/

I see. You are talking about the suit where 20 states and the DoJ sued Microsoft in 1998 and not the 1995 case which most people making your silly claim refer to. Just another fine example of your attempt to rewrite history.


Clinton was President in 1995 also. Not Bush sr.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 06:41 am
real life wrote:


Clinton was President in 1995 also. Not Bush sr.

Yes, but the 1995 suit was a result of a consent decree signed in 1989. Which is what my earlier statement said.

Who was President in 1989?
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 06:42 am
But you haven't explained how the NASDAQ could almost triple 2 years after the 1998 suit and the drop from its bubble high was a result of that suit.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 07:34 am
parados wrote:
real life wrote:


Clinton was President in 1995 also. Not Bush sr.

Yes, but the 1995 suit was a result of a consent decree signed in 1989. Which is what my earlier statement said.

Who was President in 1989?


There was an inquiry opened in 1991 by the FTC. That investigation was closed in 1993.

DOJ opened an investigation in 1993 and a consent decree was signed in 94. Is that what you are referring to?
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:04 am
If Obama wins in November, I hope Bush starts a war with France.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:24 am
I hope he declares war on that trailer park where you live.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:40 am
As opposed to your ghetto?
0 Replies
 
username
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:43 am
cj plays the race card. no presidency for him.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  0  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:44 am
Kicky is black? I thought he was a wop.
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Aug, 2008 10:45 am
You must be reading Dale Carnegie.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/15/2024 at 01:59:28