0
   

THE GENERAL ELECTION 2008

 
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:20 pm
I think Obama is the single best representative the Communist have
ever fielded for president in the Democratic party. He's awesome!







I honestly don't see how Obama could possibly defeat McCain.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:23 pm
You don't know much about politics, then, for everyone else who does, seems to think that this is the likely outcome.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:25 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Which my dear Cyclop is the same thing as saying that Obama cannot work well without a net, speak well without a script, and having to support his ideas or know something without the text in front of him is not one of his strengths.


No, it is not the same thing at all. That's your Republican wish. The truth is that in an off-the-cuff situation, Obama would still beat the pants off of Grandpa John. But, Grandpa embarrasses himself in planned and prepped speeches, like last Tues.; so simple strategy would say that forcing him to give as many of those as possible, while limiting situations where McCain does better, is the right way to go.

I have no idea why we are having this conversation...

Cycloptichorn


I can appreciate why Obama does not want to expose his weaknesses. I can even understand why partisans might prefer to turn a blind eye to their chosen candidates weaknesses though I think turning such blind eye does not support somebody's wanting the best we can get for our country.

I don't understand how somebody thinks he is defending his candidate by defending the candidate's choice to not expose what he doesn't know about the nation's history, relationships, economy, health, etc. Smile
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:30 pm
Conversations with you are frustrating, because you circle your wagons around tired and false tropes (Obama is weak in extemporaneous speaking) and no amount of conversation ever changes that. It's like, you've decided that the meme for today is 'Obama is weak in town halls, and his supporters are afraid.' And you seek to repeat it over and over, no matter what is actually being said by anyone.

That's not a conversation at all, really. Just an idiot with an idea, who thinks repeating it again and again will somehow make it true. A waste of time, really.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:31 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't know much about politics,


You're and expert?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:34 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't know much about politics,


You're and expert?


At the very least, my grammar is better.

Laughing

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:42 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Conversations with you are frustrating, because you circle your wagons around tired and false tropes (Obama is weak in extemporaneous speaking) and no amount of conversation ever changes that. It's like, you've decided that the meme for today is 'Obama is weak in town halls, and his supporters are afraid.' And you seek to repeat it over and over, no matter what is actually being said by anyone.

That's not a conversation at all, really. Just an idiot with an idea, who thinks repeating it again and again will somehow make it true. A waste of time, really.

Cycloptichorn


Hey I'm agreeing with you--are you the idiot with the idea? As you said Obama is at his weakest when he works without a script or a preprogrammed audience as he would have to do in a Town Hall meeting. Just recently I was hearing clips of a speech where he was distracted from his speech and became flustered and incoherent for several minutes. Even some of Obama's strongest supporters admit he doesn't debate well and a Town Hall format would be even less structured unless he can plant the questions in advance.

I can appreciate why you would not want to expose Obama's weakness in that way. I can also see why some, even those leaning toward Obama, might think it is important to expose that kind of weakness, however, and then decide if he is able to compensate for it sufficiently to be able to function competently as Prsident in those situations where he won't have a script either.

George W. Bush, for instance, is usually a wooden, unconvincing public speaker when working from a script or teleprompter. Frankly McCain isn't a whole lot better. Both are great in extemporaneous settings however and that is how a President most often has to work and it is important that he be able to work that way effectively.

I think it would be good to know that Obama is capable of doing that. Don't you?
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:51 pm
Quote:
As you said Obama is at his weakest when he works without a script or a preprogrammed audience as he would have to do in a Town Hall meeting


I wonder if you could link to where I said this?

But I doubt it, because this is something YOU said, not something I said. I think he's just fine without a script.

This is just one example of the intellectual dishonesty that typifies your conversation here...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 12:56 pm
You didn't say it in so many words. But I just thought since you claim ability to read my intent into so many of my posts and accuse me of this and that and make ad hominem references about this and that, it was fair game in your world to say what I think you mean when you say Obama won't allow any format where McCain might look good. And I think you mean that Obama knows he might look like an idiot in a Town Hall setting with McCain. If he honestly felt he could 'beat the pants off him', he would agree to it in a heartbeat.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 01:02 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
H2O_MAN wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
You don't know much about politics,


You're and expert?


At the very least, my grammar is better.



My grammar is fine, but my typing skills are not so good.



As for Obama, I think he is the single best representative the Communist have ever fielded for president in the Democratic party.

Electing Obama as president is possibly the worst thing that could happen to our Republic.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 01:40 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
You didn't say it in so many words. But I just thought since you claim ability to read my intent into so many of my posts and accuse me of this and that and make ad hominem references about this and that, it was fair game in your world to say what I think you mean when you say Obama won't allow any format where McCain might look good. And I think you mean that Obama knows he might look like an idiot in a Town Hall setting with McCain. If he honestly felt he could 'beat the pants off him', he would agree to it in a heartbeat.


Nah, it's about strategy.

The Chicago Bulls, during their heyday with Jordan in the 90's, could beat any team. They had the skills to compete and beat any team in the league. Some teams however are great on the three-point game; some are great on the transition, fast-paced game.

Even if you are a superior team, it isn't smart to play to your opponent's strengths. It's smart to deny those strengths and force them to try and beat you in other ways. That grasp of strategy is part of what makes teams great. And it's why Obama will limit, or not participate in, what McCain's team considers to be their greatest strength.

Really not hard to figure out; if you think about it for about, oh, three seconds...

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 02:36 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Nah, it's about strategy.

The Chicago Bulls, during their heyday with Jordan in the 90's, could beat any team. They had the skills to compete and beat any team in the league. Some teams however are great on the three-point game; some are great on the transition, fast-paced game.

Even if you are a superior team, it isn't smart to play to your opponent's strengths. It's smart to deny those strengths and force them to try and beat you in other ways. That grasp of strategy is part of what makes teams great. And it's why Obama will limit, or not participate in, what McCain's team considers to be their greatest strength.

Really not hard to figure out; if you think about it for about, oh, three seconds...

Cycloptichorn


Obama's afraid the man from Phoenix will posterize him, and would rather play H-O-R-S-E.

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/6166/kwameposterizeduv5.jpg
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:21 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Those 'weekly town hall meetings' are designed to trap Obama. They put McCain in his best possible light (off the cuff speaking) and Obama in his worse.


(Emphasis mine.)

I can see that you would mean that while Obama is better than McCain in every possible way, Obama is less-strong in town hall situations than in other situations.

I took it the same way Foxfyre did though and was about to say that's not true, then got caught up (reading all of this last part, since my last post here, in a chunk).

I like the idea because Obama IS very good in town hall situations and IS very good at off-the-cuff speaking. And the expectation game is very much in Obama's favor right now -- many people seem to have this same (erroneous, IMO) idea that Obama's all about the big-rally speeches and so-so in extemporaneous stuff. And this is McCain's only real strength, campaign-wise. (His prepared speeches, as the cottage-cheese-in-lime-jello speech June 3rd showed, are jaw-droppingly bad when they're not mediocre.)

So if Obama just holds his own -- which I expect him to do -- he comes out ahead. If Obama pastes McCain -- which I think is possible, especially if he needles McCain into an angry outburst -- even better.


Quote:
They provide free advertising for McCain, who needs it.


I agree with this, and it's a major drawback. Not sure if it's enough to nix the idea.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:36 pm
sozobe wrote:
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Those 'weekly town hall meetings' are designed to trap Obama. They put McCain in his best possible light (off the cuff speaking) and Obama in his worse.


(Emphasis mine.)

I can see that you would mean that while Obama is better than McCain in every possible way, Obama is less-strong in town hall situations than in other situations.

I took it the same way Foxfyre did though and was about to say that's not true, then got caught up (reading all of this last part, since my last post here, in a chunk).

I like the idea because Obama IS very good in town hall situations and IS very good at off-the-cuff speaking. And the expectation game is very much in Obama's favor right now -- many people seem to have this same (erroneous, IMO) idea that Obama's all about the big-rally speeches and so-so in extemporaneous stuff. And this is McCain's only real strength, campaign-wise. (His prepared speeches, as the cottage-cheese-in-lime-jello speech June 3rd showed, are jaw-droppingly bad when they're not mediocre.)

So if Obama just holds his own -- which I expect him to do -- he comes out ahead. If Obama pastes McCain -- which I think is possible, especially if he needles McCain into an angry outburst -- even better.


Quote:
They provide free advertising for McCain, who needs it.


I agree with this, and it's a major drawback. Not sure if it's enough to nix the idea.


I'll even make you a deal. If Obama and McCain agree to a series of town hall meetings--I'll need more than one or two to be reassured they aren't rigged--I will honestly agree if Obama does in fact conduct himself as well as McCain. And if he in fact does handle himself better than McCain and makes a better argument for his point of view, I'll post on the Obama thread--dedicated to Sozobe--that Obame kicks *ss. I would so much like to see those events that I won't even ask you to reciprocate if McCain wins. Smile
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 04:43 pm
It's so subjective, I don't really want to get into any kind of advance bet -- I think that we could easily view the same event and come away with completely different impressions of who won. I don't even really want to make any definite claims about three or more town hall events/ debates -- but chances seem pretty good.

Quote:
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., hinted Wednesday he's open to engaging Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in a series of nontraditional presidential debates.

"Oh, we're definitely going to be doing some town hall debates," the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee told ABC "World News" anchor Charlie Gibson.

Indicating he's not prepared to start debating McCain next week [article was written June 4th], as McCain's campaign had formally requested, Obama expressed interest in going head to head with the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as soon as his campaign fully pivots toward the general election.

"I look forward to, you know, having more than just the three traditional debates that we've seen in recent presidential contests," he said.

Obama did, however, caution that both campaigns would have to figure out the timing.


http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Politics/story?id=4999288&page=1
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 05:20 pm
sozobe wrote:
It's so subjective, I don't really want to get into any kind of advance bet -- I think that we could easily view the same event and come away with completely different impressions of who won. I don't even really want to make any definite claims about three or more town hall events/ debates -- but chances seem pretty good.

Quote:
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., hinted Wednesday he's open to engaging Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., in a series of nontraditional presidential debates.

"Oh, we're definitely going to be doing some town hall debates," the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee told ABC "World News" anchor Charlie Gibson.

Indicating he's not prepared to start debating McCain next week [article was written June 4th], as McCain's campaign had formally requested, Obama expressed interest in going head to head with the presumptive Republican presidential nominee as soon as his campaign fully pivots toward the general election.

"I look forward to, you know, having more than just the three traditional debates that we've seen in recent presidential contests," he said.

Obama did, however, caution that both campaigns would have to figure out the timing.


http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Politics/story?id=4999288&page=1


LOL, okay. But I think you're the first time who ever refused to bet me when the only one who could lose would be me. Smile
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 05:25 pm
If you are moved to post that Obama kicks @ss, I wouldn't object... ;-)
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 05:28 pm
Obama is a kiss ass ... Jimmy Carter with a tan Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jun, 2008 05:32 pm
H2O_MAN wrote:
Obama is a kiss ass ... Jimmy Carter with a tan Twisted Evil
pathetic loser!
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Jun, 2008 01:22 pm
A little compare and contrast, courtesy of TPM:

Quote:
David Brock's Tough-Talking Third-Party Group Fizzles
By Greg Sargent - May 15, 2008, 11:47AM

A few weeks ago, Media Matters' David Brock announced to great fanfare that he was taking over Progressive Media USA, a third-party group that would, he vowed, raise $40 million for ads to soften up John McCain in advance of the general election.

Now the group is quietly shuttering those efforts with barely a whimper.

Barack Obama's fundraising team has been quietly putting out word to major donors that they didn't want any money to go to such third-party groups. Instead, they wanted the cash to go to the Obama campaign, so Obama advisers could be in sole control of the campaign's message.

It worked. Brock has quietly leaked a statement to The Washington Post saying that his group is, for all practical purposes, defunct.


Quote:
McCain: I Can't Stop Outside Groups From Attacking Obama
By Greg Sargent - June 12, 2008, 11:15AM

John McCain has claimed that he doesn't want independent groups to attack Barack Obama, but in a new interview he says that, well, there really isn't anything he can do about it if those groups do decide to swift boat the Democrat:

    GOP presidential contender John McCain says he can't control every attack ad aimed at Democrat Barack Obama and fully expects he'll face a similar barrage, sounding the bell for a raucous general election brawl. "I can't be a referee of every spot run on television," McCain told the Herald in an exclusive interview. "I admire Sen. Obama and his accomplishments, but we all know there are groups who want to attack me." The Arizona senator's hands-off posture on attack ads by now-infamous tax-free and unaccountable political groups called 527s marks a softening of his view on the negative campaign tactic -- and opens the door to a no-holds-barred five-month scramble.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/03/2025 at 09:47:27