Phoenix32890 wrote:OCCOM BILL wrote:Why do they always scatter like cockroaches whenever feeding the world is suggested?
Bill- Where is it written that the U.S. is obliged to feed the world?

Who said we were? Tell me Phoenix; would you rather your tax dollars are spent in an ongoing effort to Free Iraqis, or that we provided clean water and basic sustenance to every person on this planet? Which do you think would do more to prevent terrorism? Which do you think would bring us closer to world peace? Which do you think would stimulate the economy more (over the next century)?
Henry Ford figured out that if his employees could afford a car; they'd buy one. Currently there are 3,000,000,000 potential customers slipping through the cracks.
Plus I don't like seeing pictures of starving kids.
Are you really that satisfied with the status quo?
Sooner of later; we need to figure out as a people that the wealth is not a pizza. Others don't have to get less in order for us to get more. That hasn't been the case since money moved from land to currency. Adam Smith described the unlimited economy in "The Wealth of Nations" back in George Washington's days. The United States subsequently proved his theory sound. There is no good reason the world can't follow.