0
   

voluntary rape

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:41 am
Bella Dea wrote:
Oh for heavens sake.

There is no such thing as voluntary rape. Get a grip.

If a man takes advantage of a women who is so drunk she can't function, that is rape.

If a man takes advantage of a woman who is drunk but is still in control of her body, it is not rape.

Rape is when someone takes sex from you. You do not ask for it. You do not suggest it. You do not want it. Period.

Rape is not about sex.
Rape is about power and control over another person.

When will people learn this?

I find it hard to agree that:
" Rape is not about sex. "
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:36 am
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Bella Dea wrote:
Oh for heavens sake.

There is no such thing as voluntary rape. Get a grip.

If a man takes advantage of a women who is so drunk she can't function, that is rape.

If a man takes advantage of a woman who is drunk but is still in control of her body, it is not rape.

Rape is when someone takes sex from you. You do not ask for it. You do not suggest it. You do not want it. Period.

Rape is not about sex.
Rape is about power and control over another person.

When will people learn this?

I find it hard to agree that:
" Rape is not about sex. "


Then you'd be wrong. Do some research. Educate youself.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:58 am
are you really wanting to have that conversation?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 11:21 am
Given the way rape laws work now rape can be completely about sex. Once the concept of rape was expanded to include date rape and marital rape this was inevitable. Guys get hung on the rape laws who clearly were only looking to get laid, but who went about it in the wrong way.
0 Replies
 
Bella Dea
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 11:38 am
shewolfnm wrote:
are you really wanting to have that conversation?


No.
Which is why I will not engage in any more disussion on this thread.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 03:25 pm
Bella Dea wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Bella Dea wrote:
Oh for heavens sake.

There is no such thing as voluntary rape. Get a grip.

If a man takes advantage of a women who is so drunk she can't function, that is rape.

If a man takes advantage of a woman who is drunk but is still in control of her body, it is not rape.

Rape is when someone takes sex from you. You do not ask for it. You do not suggest it. You do not want it. Period.

Rape is not about sex.
Rape is about power and control over another person.

When will people learn this?

I find it hard to agree that:
" Rape is not about sex. "


Then you'd be wrong. Do some research. Educate youself.

I shud find research telling me
what the rapist was THINKING during
the illegal use of his sexual appendage ?
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:00 pm
One the definition of rape was expanded to include relationship sexual encounters gone wrong it was inevitable that rape laws would be used against those who just wanted to get laid, who have no need to do violence upon women. Much or all of what is called date rape and marital rape needs to be called something other than rape. It also should not be treated in prisons, but rather out patient social services. We make the same mistakes with sex laws as we make with drug law....40 years after drug laws went bad we refuse to learn a thing.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:16 pm
Re: voluntary rape
Chumly wrote:
Here's a new (to me) phrase and a blurb about it. Draw your own conclusions.

Quote:
The concept of voluntary rape

Rape is bad. Let there be no doubt about it. A man (or woman) entering or otherwise sexually abusing and molesting the body of a woman (or man) against her (or his) will is in my mind a disgusting and unforgivable crime. I am thankful for every law that is passed to punish committers of rape and to help the victims. I even remember making a little victory dance once my country decided it was forbidden by law to rape your spouse.
Strangely enough,
prior to that law you were allowed to rape someone
once you were married to that person
. Bad thing indeed.



http://www.cecile-weekly.com/index.php/the-concept-of-voluntary-rape/

It was not strange.

For centuries, it was understood that at the moment of marriage,
by the act of marriage, there WAS a de jure and de facto union of the sexes,
and that consent to coitus was a deep and permanently abiding element
of the contract of marriage.
In other words,
the contract of marriage included a permanent waiver
of objection to coitus.

If this understanding was INCORRECT,
then what was the purpose of getting married ?
WHAT was a wedding intended to accomplish, if not that ??

In my jurisdiction, NY, the rape statute
defined the crime as coitus forced upon a woman who was not his wife.
By deleting that statutory language,
the essence of what the legislature was saying
is that sex is only a trivial and negligible incident of marriage.

From that reasoning, I DISSENT.






( Note that tho I have had delightful young ladies living with me
[seriatim] over the years n decades, I have never been married
and will preserve that state of affairs. )




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:28 pm
hawkeye10 wrote:
One the definition of rape was expanded to include relationship sexual encounters gone wrong it was inevitable that rape laws would be used against those who just wanted to get laid, who have no need to do violence upon women. Much or all of what is called date rape and marital rape needs to be called something other than rape.

It can be dangerous for those who opt to get married
( an act of questionable wisdom ? )

If Mrs. John Q. Public discovers, after an act of coitus,
that John has acquired a mistress,
will her memory be retroactively clouded by negative emotion,
when she contacts the local constabulary the next day,
or a few months thereafter ?

or if thay just have a fight about money ????


risky
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:33 pm
Re: voluntary rape
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Note that tho I have had delightful young ladies living with me[seriatim] over the years n decades, I have never been married
and will preserve that state of affairs. )


And that's a blessing for every woman that might cross your path!
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 04:47 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
It can be dangerous for those who opt to get married
( an act of questionable wisdom ? )

If Mrs. John Q. Public discovers, after an act of coitus,
that John has acquired a mistress,
will her memory be retroactively clouded by negative emotion,
when she contacts the local constabulary the next day,
or a few months thereafter ?

or if thay just have a fight about money ????


risky


I am not sure that marriage has anything to do with it, the problem is attaching the rape concept to relationship sex. Memory is heavily influenced by emotion in ways that we ourselves don't see, and relationships often have a strong emotional component. A woman who tends to get emotional, and be driven by her emotions, has a memory that likely has been in part created by her emotions. The same may be true for a man but is less likely. When it is he said/she said and memories are not reliable then justice can not prevail. This is one of the many reasons why relationship sex problems should be handled by public health systems and not justice systems.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 05:47 pm
On the other hand,
if a young lady ( or an old one ) simply accepts a date,
during whose progress her escort becomes malfeasant
and goes to raping on her,
as a matter of elementary justice,
she is rightfully entitled to the aid of the police
and to be avenged by the criminal justice system.




David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:04 pm
Re: voluntary rape
CalamityJane wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
Note that tho I have had delightful young ladies living with me[seriatim]
over the years n decades, I have never been married
and will preserve that state of affairs. )


And that's a blessing for every woman that might cross your path!

Thay don 't seem to see it that way, Jane.

Its not unusual for me to have very sweet n pretty young ladies
( the last one had a very recent 21st birthday; young enuf to be my grandchild )
approach me with twinkles in their eyes, later calling me n writing me letters.

( I can t IMAGINE that it has anything to do with money; it must be my smile. <G> )




David
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 06:28 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
On the other hand,
if a young lady ( or an old one ) simply accepts a date,
during whose progress her escort becomes malfeasant
and goes to raping on her,
as a matter of elementary justice,
she is rightfully entitled to the aid of the police
and to be avenged by the criminal justice system.
David


If there is no or very little relationship then the act was rape, a perp does not get away from the law by getting a woman to agree to a date. If however a woman consents to a long term relationship, she should over time lose the right to claim rape.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 07:02 pm
You guys just don't get it - when a women says NO - any woman, regardless
of wife, girlfriend, date or stranger - if she says NO that means she cannot
be touched. Anyone trying to have intercourse with a women against her
will is rape!

No if, no when, no nothing - it is rape!
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 07:06 pm
hawkeye10 wrote:
OmSigDAVID wrote:
On the other hand,
if a young lady ( or an old one ) simply accepts a date,
during whose progress her escort becomes malfeasant
and goes to raping on her,
as a matter of elementary justice,
she is rightfully entitled to the aid of the police
and to be avenged by the criminal justice system.
David


If there is no or very little relationship then the act was rape,
a perp does not get away from the law by getting a woman to agree to a date.
If however a woman consents to a long term relationship,
she should over time lose the right to claim rape.

Well, with all respect, I can remember a situation of lust-at-first-sight,
when I was on a Grayhound Bus from L.A. to Phoenix, Arizona.
I made a general practice of minding my own business, but
a 17 year old girl sat next to me and convinced me to get off the bus
and spend the night with her at one of the rest stop motels. I was 11 years old.
It was a one-night-stand.
We went our separate ways,
but I don 't believe that I shud have been accused of rape.

( Since well over half a century has passed since this event,
I guess I am safe, on the applicable statute of limitations. )


David
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 07:37 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
You guys just don't get it - when a women says NO - any woman, regardless
of wife, girlfriend, date or stranger - if she says NO that means she cannot
be touched. Anyone trying to have intercourse with a women against her
will is rape!

No if, no when, no nothing - it is rape!

I agree with u.
I have no trouble agreeing with u, as to the morality of the situation.

Even if I HAD been married,
I cud not find it in my nature to force myself upon my wife,
in such circumstances ( altho, either spouse is free to re-evaluate
whether he or she chooses to remain in that wedded relationship ),
but if by the act of marriage,
by the statutory definition of marriage,
objections to coitus were permanently waived ( as used to be the case )
then the criminal justice system shud not be called upon
to address their differences.
This ASSUMES that no wife beating is going on.
That is a different issue, seperately and distinctly cognizable under criminal law.


I agree with Jane.
If the wife says NO,
then the definition of safe sex is to visit your favorite brothel
and get rid of a few dollars, no questions asked; no fighting involved


just peaceful relief; right ?


.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 07:42 pm
Right! If your wife is withholding sex permanently, then the marriage
vow is off, and you can do as you please, except touch her.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 08:01 pm
There have been times, in the last 10 years, in which I have had sex with my wife solely because she cajoled me with accusations to the effect, that if I did not have sex with her right then and now, I did not want or love her going forward, and thus there was no point in continuing the relationship.

At those times, I have had sex with her for the express purpose of diminishing her concerns.
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Mon 31 Mar, 2008 08:12 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
You guys just don't get it - when a women says NO - any woman, regardless
of wife, girlfriend, date or stranger - if she says NO that means she cannot
be touched. Anyone trying to have intercourse with a women against her
will is rape!

No if, no when, no nothing - it is rape!


There has been very little commonality among societies historically about what rape is, and currently the definition is changing rapidly in favor of giving more power to women in relationships. I would argue that your argument is proven wrong by the historical record. Rape is anything but like "ye shall not kill", a universally recognized standard of behaviour.

This whole business about rape being about violence against women is debatable as well
Quote:
Amazon.com
Evolutionary psychology often stomps where other branches of science fear to tread. Case in point: A Natural History of Rape. Randy Thornhill, a biologist, and Craig T. Palmer, an anthropologist, have attempted to apply evolutionary principles to one of the most disgusting of human behaviors, and the result is a guaranteed storm of media hype and debate. The book's central argument is that rape is a genetically developed strategy sustained over generations of human life because it is a kind of sexual selection--a successful reproductive strategy. This runs directly counter to the prevailing notion--that rape is predominantly about violent power, and only secondarily about sex.

http://www.amazon.com/Natural-History-Rape-Biological-Coercion/dp/0262201259
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » voluntary rape
  3. » Page 7
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/05/2025 at 11:00:47